Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/948,028

HANGER

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Examiner
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
3632
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Liberty Garden Products Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 4m
To Grant
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
818 granted / 1392 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+22.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
73 currently pending
Career history
1465
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
46.5%
+6.5% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.2%
-13.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1392 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claim 14 is objected to because of the following informalities: the phrase “more than one strap” is grammatically incorrect. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 3-10 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re. Cl. 3, the limitation “the arm includes an attachment” renders the claim indefinite in the Examiner’s position. Applicant’s specification and drawings do not appear to call out a specific “attachment” in reference to the arm, therefore it is unclear what the Applicant is referring to. However, Applicant’s specification does discuss attachments (23) located on the straps (22) which function to enable the straps to wrap around an object to be hung. Therefore, it is unclear if there is some structure within the arm that constitutes the attachment or if Applicant intended to refer to the attachment of the strap in this instance. Appropriate clarification is requested. Claim 8 recites the limitation "the hose stand" in Line 1-2. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. It is suggested that the Applicant amend this phrase to read “a hose stand” to overcome this issue. Re. Cl. 9, the limitation “the distal ends are separated from the hanger by a length of the arms” renders the claim indefinite in the Examiner’s position. Initially, the Examiner wishes to point out that there has been no previous mentioning of multiple straps (see Claim 1 which establishes “a strap”). Further, it is unclear which part of the hanger is being spaced from the distal end of the straps by the arm since the arm is part of the hanger itself. Therefore, it is unclear what the Applicant is referring to in this instance. It appears as if the Applicant may intend to state that the distal ends are separated from the hanger by a length of the straps which would make sense in view of Applicant’s figures. The claim will be interpreted accordingly for the purpose of examination. Appropriate clarification is requested. Re. Cl. 9, the limitation “a securing point” in Line 3 renders the claim indefinite since it appears as if a securing point has already been previously claimed. In claim 2, which claim 9 ultimately depends from already establishes a securing point. Therefore, it is unclear if the Applicant is referring to a different securing point or the same one. It is suggested that the Applicant amend this limitation to read “the securing point” to overcome this issue. Re. Cl. 20, the limitation “including attachments along the strap” in Line 1 renders the claim indefinite since the attachments have already been included in claim 18, from which claim 20 depends (see Line 7). Therefore, it is unclear if the Applicant is referring to the same attachments or different ones. It is suggested that the Applicant amend claim 20 to clarify that the attachments in claims 18 and 20 are the same structure to overcome this issue. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jonsson US 4752054 (hereinafter Jonsson). PNG media_image1.png 628 990 media_image1.png Greyscale Re. Cl. 1, Jonsson discloses: A hanger (Fig. 4) comprising: a hook (see annotated figure 4; the shape of the opening 7’ in the annotated hook is curved to hold onto a rod or other appropriate support, therefore being a “hook’), a neck extending from the hook (see annotated figure 4), a body interfacing with the neck (see annotated figure 4), an arm extending from the body (see annotated figure 4), at least one flexible strap (2’s Fig. 4) extending from the arm at a proximal end and reengaging with the hanger at a distal end of the flexible strap (see Fig. 2, and Col. 2, Lines 9-12). Re. Cl. 2, Jonsson discloses: an opening (31, Fig. 4) serving as a securing point (for securing 2’s as discussed in Col. 2, Lines 9-12). Re. Cl. 3, Jonsson discloses: the arm includes an attachment (see Fig. 4, attachments 30). Re. Cl. 4, Jonsson discloses: a set of straps (see 2’s Fig. 4) Re. Cl. 5, Jonsson discloses: the straps are differentially adjustable (see Fig. 4, by being separate 2’s and 31’s, the straps are differentially adjustable). Re. Cl. 6, Jonsson discloses: the set of straps are individually adjustable irrespective of one another (see 4, by having separate 2’s and 31’s, the straps 2’ are adjustable independently). Re. Cl. 7, Jonsson discloses: the straps extend vertically and are longer vertically than horizontally (see Fig. 4). Re. Cl. 8, Jonsson discloses: the straps are configured to surround portions of the hose stand and reconnect with the hanger such that the straps enclose the portions of the hose stand (see Fig. 4, the straps are configured to wrap and extend into 31’s, thus they are configured to surround portions of a hose stand in the claimed intended use language). Re. Cl. 9, Jonsson discloses: the straps include distal ends and the distal ends are separated from the hanger by a length of the arms (see Fig. 4, the distal ends of the straps 2’ are spaced from the hanger by the length of the straps 2’), the distal ends flexing to interface with the hanger at a securing point (see Fig. 2 and Col. 2, Lines 9-12). Re. Cl. 10, Jonsson discloses: the straps curve to interface with the hanger at the distal ends (see Fig. 2 and Col. 2, Lines 9-12). Re. Cl. 11, Jonsson discloses: A universal hanger system (Fig. 4) comprising: a hook, a neck extending from the hook, a body interfacing with the neck, an arm extending from the body (see annotated figure 4), at least one flexible strap extending from the arm at a proximal end (see 2’ Fig. 4) and reengaging with the hanger at a distal end of the flexible strap (see Fig. 2 and Col. 2, Lines 9-12), wherein the strap forms an adjustable loop (see Fig. 4, by the degree in which 2’s are engaged with 31s). Re. Cl. 12, Jonsson discloses: the adjustable loop may hang an item for hanging at different heights according to an adjustment of the adjustable loop (see Fig. 4, the straps 2’ can be selectively secured into 31s thereby enabling hanging at different heights). Re. Cl. 13, Jonsson discloses: attachments on the strap (see 30, Fig. 4). Re. Cl. 14, Jonsson discloses: the hanger includes more than one straps (see 2’s Fig. 4). Re. Cl. 15, Jonsson discloses: the straps are differentially adjustable (see Fig. 4, by being separate 2’s and 31’s, the straps are differentially adjustable). Re. Cl. 16, Jonsson discloses: the straps adjust to hang a host stand (see Fig. 4, Col. 2, Lines 9-12; the straps are capable of being used to hang a host stand as claimed in the claimed intended use). Re. Cl. 17, Jonsson discloses: the hanger is adapted to hang a set of items having different hanging points in a level plane (see Fig. 2 and Col. 2, Lines 9-12, by being separate entities, the straps 2’ are adapted to hang a set of items as claimed in the intended use). Re. Cl. 18, Jonsson discloses: In a hose stand (see Fig. 4, the hanger is capable of being used in a hose stand), a universal hanger (Fig. 4) adapted to uniformly hang various structured hose stands (see Fig. 4, by having separate straps 2’ and openings 31, the hanger is adapted to be used in the claimed intended use), said hanger comprising: a hook, a body extending from the hook, an arm extending from the body (see annotated figure 4), a set of flexible straps (2’ Fig. 4) extending from the arm at a proximal end (see Fig. 4), and the straps including attachments (30, Fig. 4) for securing the straps along a distal end at respective securing points (see 31, Fig. 4; Col. 2, Lines 9-12), wherein the straps each form an adjustable loop (see Fig. 2 and Col. 2, Line 9-12). Re. Cl. 19, Jonsson discloses: the straps are differently adjustable (see Fig. 4, by being separate 2’s and 31’s, the straps are differentially adjustable). Re. Cl. 20, Jonsson discloses: including attachments (30, Fig. 4) along the straps for engaging the hanger at variable points to form different hanging heights (see Fig. 4, by having different 30s engage with 31). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chmelar US 2018/0244447, Coote US 8994535, Giampavolo US 2003/0019892, Jones US 4898542, Kolton US 4714156, and Yeates US 11957236 disclose other known hangers which are presented to the Applicant for their consideration. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER E GARFT whose telephone number is (571)270-1171. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Terrell McKinnon can be reached at (571)272-4797. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER GARFT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601446
BRAKING SYSTEM FOR HOLDING A SCREEN
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12599189
HELMET CAMERA SYSTEM, FASTENING DEVICE, HELMET SYSTEM, AND CAMERA SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12590667
HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE HOLDER FOR A MULTIPLATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573981
TRESTLE BASE AND TRESTLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12565985
LIGHT HOOK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+22.8%)
2y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1392 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month