Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Liberty Garden Products Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The portfolio is also associated with 1 distinct art unit. GARFT, CHRISTOPHER is the busiest examiner for the company.
GARFT, CHRISTOPHER has 1 pending action, which is the same as the busiest examiner pending count. The 1 distinct examiner works within the 1 distinct art unit. This 1 distinct art unit is categorized under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The 1 distinct examiner is the only examiner listed for the portfolio.
The equality between the 1 pending office action and the 1 distinct examiner indicates that no examiner is handling multiple cases. For a practitioner, this means the prosecution of the pending matter is not influenced by other active files from the same company. The 1 distinct art unit provides a single regulatory environment for the case.
Because the number of pending office actions is 1, the company can focus its entire legal strategy on the specific requirements of the busiest examiner. The matching counts between the action and the examiner simplify the administrative oversight required. The 1 distinct art unit ensures that the technical focus remains consistent throughout the prosecution process.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 1 | 59.0% | +23.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18948028 | HANGER | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 6d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18948028 | HANGER | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 6d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3632 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18948028 | HANGER | GARFT, CHRISTOPHER | 3632 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 6d | Pending | Nov 14, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial