Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/948,133

NONVOLATILE MEMORY AND WRITING METHOD

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Priority
Mar 18, 2014 — JP 2014-055408 +8 more
Examiner
RADKE, JAY W
Art Unit
2827
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
KIOXIA Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
722 granted / 842 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
863
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
66.1%
+26.1% vs TC avg
§102
10.6%
-29.4% vs TC avg
§112
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 842 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
CTNF 18/948,133 CTNF 84055 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on November 14, 2024 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting 08-33 AIA The non-statutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A non-statutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg , 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman , 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi , 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum , 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel , 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington , 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on non-statutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a non-statutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA/25, or PTO/AIA/26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. 08-36 AIA Claim s 1-10 are rejected on the ground of non-statutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claim s 1-9 of U.S. Patent No. 12,176,027 in view of Wan et al. (2011/0126080) . Regarding claim 1: Claim 1 of the reference patent teaches all of the subject matter of this claim except for the following: a memory controller configured to control the nonvolatile memory; and the control unit is configured to write the data associated with a writing request from the memory controller to the memory cells. Wan (2011/0126080) teaches a memory controller (controller 244 in FIG. 3) configured to control a nonvolatile memory (memory die 212 having a NAND memory cell array 200); and a control unit in the nonvolatile memory is configured to write data associated with a writing (programming) request from the memory controller to the memory cells ([0043-0048]; FIG. 10B discloses a programming operation; [0104-0107]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the teaching of Wan into the device of claim 1 of the reference patent in a manner such that a memory controller would be configured to control the nonvolatile memory; and the control unit would be configured to write the data associated with a writing request from the memory controller to the memory cells. The motivation to do so would have been to provide a memory controller to control the nonvolatile memory, wherein the nonvolatile memory would be a NAND type flash memory like that of Wan, by sending commands and data to the nonvolatile memory and to perform other control functions as exemplified by Wan. Regarding claims 2-9: Claims 2-9, respectively, of the reference patent teaches the subject matter of these claims. Regarding claim 10: Claim 1 of the reference patent as modified above teaches the subject matter of this claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY W RADKE whose telephone number is (571)270-1622. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9-6 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amir Zarabian can be reached at 272-1852. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAY W. RADKE Primary Examiner Art Unit 2827 /JAY W. RADKE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2827 Application/Control Number: 18/948,133 Page 2 Art Unit: 2827 Application/Control Number: 18/948,133 Page 3 Art Unit: 2827 Application/Control Number: 18/948,133 Page 4 Art Unit: 2827 Application/Control Number: 18/948,133 Page 5 Art Unit: 2827 Application/Control Number: 18/948,133 Page 6 Art Unit: 2827
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 14, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12676187
FERROELECTRIC FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS BASED APPROACH FOR EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE CALCULATION IN NEUROMORPHIC HARDWARE
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676201
MEMORY SYSTEM
1y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670939
MEMORY SYSTEM, OPERATING METHOD OF THE MEMORY SYSTEM, AND INTERFACE CIRCUIT OF THE MEMORY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12670951
SILICON BRAIN
1y 8m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665019
SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 842 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month