Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/953,364

ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2023 — JP 2023-222459
Examiner
HINES, ANNE M
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sharp Display Technology Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
7m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
787 granted / 920 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
928
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
§112
4.4%
-35.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Jo et al. (US 2021/0359079). Regarding claim 1, Jo discloses an array substrate (Figs. 1-4) comprising: a gate line (151 & 152; Paragraph [0108]); a source line crossing the gate line (171a & 171b & 171c; Paragraph [0086]); a switching component disposed on a crossing portion of the gate line and the source line (T1 & T2 & T3; Paragraph [0069-0072]); a semiconductor film included in the switching component (Paragraph [0093]); a first insulating film disposed between a layer including the gate line and a layer including the semiconductor film (120; Paragraph [0100]); and a second insulating film disposed between a layer including the semiconductor film and a layer including the source line (111; Paragraph [0092]), wherein the source line overlaps the gate line via the first insulating film and the second insulating film (Fig. 4, 152 8 120 & 171B & 171C). Regarding claim 2, Jo further discloses wherein the switching component includes a source electrode that is connected to the semiconductor film, the source line is connected to the source electrode and is connected to the semiconductor film via the source electrode, and the source electrode is disposed between the first insulating film and the second insulating film (Fig. 4, 111 & 120 & 2131; Paragraph [0096]). Regarding claim 3, Jo further discloses wherein the source electrode does not overlap the gate line (Fig. 4, 2131 & 151 & 152). Regarding claim 4, Jo discloses further comprising a relay electrode (179; Paragraph [0124]), wherein the switching component includes a drain electrode that is connected to the semiconductor film (2133; Paragraph [0093]), the relay electrode is connected to the drain electrode and is connected to the semiconductor film via the drain electrode (Paragraph [0126]), and the drain electrode is disposed between the first insulating film and the second insulating film (Fig. 4, 2133 & 111 & 120). Regarding claim 5, Jo further discloses the array substrate according to claim 1; and an opposed substrate opposed to the array substrate (210; Paragraph [0221]). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANNE M HINES whose telephone number is (571)272-2285. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F: 8:00-4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James Greece, can be reached on 571-272-3711. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Anne M Hines/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2879
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12684996
ELECTROLUMINESCENT DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684983
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12648324
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12648334
DISPLAY DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 7m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12641953
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+10.9%)
2y 3m (~7m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month