Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 18/957,034

SHIELD CABLE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 22, 2024
Priority
Nov 22, 2023 — JP 2023-198261
Examiner
ESTRADA, ANGEL R
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Proterial Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
42%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
1162 granted / 1359 resolved
+25.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -44% lift
Without
With
+-43.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1379
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.3%
-2.7% vs TC avg
§102
54.3%
+14.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1359 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement filed on January 22, 2024 has been considered by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Wang et al (CN 215933247; hereinafter Wang). Regarding claim 1, Wang discloses shield cable (see figure 1) comprising: a central conductor (1); an insulator (2) situated closer to an outer circumference of the shield cable than the central conductor (1; see figure 1) is; a first tape layer (3) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the insulator (2; see figure 1) is, the first tape layer (3) being made of a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (water blocking tape); a shield (6) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the first tape layer (3; see figure 1) is; a second tape layer (7) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the shield (6; see figure 1) is, the second tape layer (7) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (armour layer; which can be a resin armour layer); a sheath (8) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer is (see figure 1). Regarding claim 2, Wang discloses the shield cable (100), wherein the central conductor (1) includes conductor strands that are twisted together (see figure 1; paragraph 0007), wherein the first tape layer (3) and the second tape layer (7) are each wound in a spiral manner, and wherein a twisting direction of the conductor strands is opposite a winding direction of the first tape layer and a winding direction of the second tape layer (see figure 1). Regarding claim 3, Wang discloses a shield cable (see figure 1) comprising: electric wires (1) twisted together (see figure 1; paragraph 0007); a first tape layer (3) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the electric wires (1; see figure 1) are, the first tape layer (3) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (water blocking tape); a shield (6) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the first tape layer (3; see figure 1) is; a second tape layer (7) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the shield (6, see figure 1) is, the second tape layer (7) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (armour layer; which can be a resin armour layer); and a sheath (8) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer (7; see figure 1) is. Regarding claim 4, Wang discloses the shield cable (see figure 1), wherein the first tape layer (3) and the second tape layer (7) are each wound in a spiral manner, and wherein a twisting direction of the electric wires is opposite a winding direction of the first tape layer and a winding direction of the second tape layer (see figure 1). 4. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang et al (CN 117457271; hereinafter Wang’271). Regarding claim 1, Wang’271 discloses shield cable (see figure 1) comprising: a central conductor (1); an insulator (4) situated closer to an outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 1) than the central conductor is; a first tape layer (11) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 1) than the insulator (4) is, the first tape (11) layer being made of a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (see figure 1); a shield (7) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 1) than the first tape layer (11) is; a second tape layer (8 or 6) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 1) than the shield (8 or 6) is, the second tape layer (8 or 6) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (fire resistant layer comprises mica tape; paragraph 0033); and a sheath (9) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer is (see figure 1). Regarding claim 2, Wang’271 discloses the shield cable (see figure 1), wherein the central conductor (1) includes conductor strands that are twisted together (see figure 1), wherein the first tape layer (11) and the second tape layer (8 or 6) are each wound in a spiral manner, and wherein a twisting direction of the conductor strands is opposite a winding direction of the first tape layer and a winding direction of the second tape layer (see figure 1). Regarding claim 3, Wang’271 discloses a shield cable (see figure 1) comprising: electric wires twisted together (see figure 1); a first tape layer (11) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the electric wires (1; see figure 1) are, the first tape layer (11) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (paragraph 0028); a shield (7) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the first tape layer (11; see figure 1) is; a second tape layer (8 or 6) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the shield (7, see figure 1) is, the second tape layer including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (fire resistant layer comprises mica tape; paragraph 0033); and a sheath (9) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer (8 or 6; see figure 1) is. Regarding claim 4, Wang’271 discloses the shield cable (see figure 1), wherein the first tape layer (11) and the second tape layer (8, 6) are each wound in a spiral manner, and wherein a twisting direction of the electric wires is opposite a winding direction of the first tape layer and a winding direction of the second tape layer (see figure 1). 5. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Masahiro (JP 2018-041699; hereinafter Masahiro). Regarding claim 1, Masahiro discloses shield cable (100) comprising: a central conductor (10); an insulator (20) situated closer to an outer circumference of the shield cable than the central conductor (10; see figure 2b) is; a first tape layer (30) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the insulator (20; see figure 2b) is, the first tape (30) layer being made of a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (paragraph 0017); a shield (50) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the first tape layer (30; see figure 2b) is; a second tape layer (60) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the shield (50; see figure 2b) is, the second tape layer (60) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (polyethylene terephthalate tape; paragraph 0038); and a sheath (70) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer is (see figure 2b). 6. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(1) as being anticipated by Uematsu (US 4,472,597). Regarding claim 1, Uematsu discloses shield cable (see figure 2) comprising: a central conductor (1); an insulator (3) situated closer to an outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 2) than the central conductor is; a first tape layer (4) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 2) than the insulator (3) is, the first tape (4) layer being made of a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape (column 3 lines 29-33; crosslinked polyethylene, polyethylene, ethylene-propylene rubber, and butyl rubber); a shield (5) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 2) than the first tape layer (4) is; a second tape layer (8) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable (see figure 2) than the shield (5) is, the second tape layer (8) including a paper, a non-woven fabric, or a resin tape; and a sheath (6) situated closer to the outer circumference of the shield cable than the second tape layer is (see figure 2). Conclusion 7. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yoshida et al (US 5,216,202), Okamoto (US 2025/0125545) and Tanaka (US 2025/0037903) disclose a shield cable. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication should be directed to Angel R. Estrada at telephone number (571) 272-1973. The Examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday (8:30am -5:00pm). If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Imani N. Hayman can be reached on (571) 270-5528. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) OR 571-272-1000. July 23, 2026 /ANGEL R ESTRADA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2841
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 22, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12701658
WIRING SUBSTRATE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700827
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND INVERTER FOR SOLAR CELL MODULE INCLUDING SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695283
WEATHERPROOF MULTIPURPOSE ENCLOSURE WITH INTEGRATED FLASHING
11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689199
POP-IN OLD WORK ELECTRICAL BOX
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12672232
PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD FOR MAKING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
42%
With Interview (-43.6%)
2y 1m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1359 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month