Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/957,949

DATA PROCESSING DEVICE AND DRIVING METHOD THEREOF

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 25, 2024
Examiner
MISHLER, ROBIN J
Art Unit
2611
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
488 granted / 707 resolved
+7.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
735
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
§103
56.4%
+16.4% vs TC avg
§102
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§112
4.6%
-35.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bohn (US 2012/0307423) in view of Hack (2014/0098034). Regarding claim 1, Bohn discloses a portable data processing device comprising: a first housing (416, fig. 4); a second housing (418, fig. 4); a connecting member (406, fig. 4) connecting the first housing and the second housing (see fig. 4); and a display panel (410, fig. 4) overlapping with the first housing, the second housing, and the connecting member (see fig. 4), the display panel comprising: a first display region overlapping with the first housing (see display area 410 over 416 in fig. 4); a second display region overlapping with the second housing (see display area 410 over 418 in fig. 4); and a third display region overlapping with the connecting member (see display area 410 over 406 in fig. 4), wherein the connecting member comprises a first region (see top of 406, fig. 4) overlapping with the display panel and not overlapping with either the first housing or the second housing (see fig. 4), wherein the connecting member comprises a second region (414, fig. 4) which is exposed and between the first housing and the second housing (see fig. 4), wherein the first display region is larger than the second display region (see fig. 4), wherein, in a folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region and the second display region overlap each (see fig. 4), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region and the second display region face away from each other (see fig. 4, fig. 1), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region and the third display region are visible by a user (see fig. 4, fig. 1), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the portable data processing device is configured to display an image in the first display region and the third display region (see fig. 4, fig. 1), Bohn fails to disclose wherein the third display region provided in the space in between the first and second display regions. wherein, in a folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region (front side display region 422 in fig. 4D) and the second display region (see middle display region between front 422 and back 424 in fig. 4D) overlap each other with the third display region (see front bend region of 422 in fig. 4D) provided therebetween (see fig. 4D and para. 51), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region and the second display region face away from each other 9see fig. 4D and para. 51), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the first display region and the third display region are visible by a user (see fig. 4D and para. 51), wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the portable data processing device is configured to display an image in the first display region and the third display region (para. 51, 43 and fig. 4D; wherein display region 422, including the front bending area of 422, displays an image and is active), and not to display an image in the second display region (para. 43, 51; wherein the occluded middle display region is deactivated and does not display an image). When the invention was made (pre-AIA ) or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention (AIA ), it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to include the teachings of Hack in the device of Bohn. The motivation for doing so would have been to have a flexible display which can be folded into an S-shape (Hack; para. 51, 43 and fig. 4D; further wherein the display may be arranged to be entirely or partially usable when in the collapsed state), providing greater usability. Regarding claim 2, Bohn discloses a transistor provided in the display panel comprises an oxide semiconductor in a channel formation region (para. 20; wherein an LCD includes conventional transistors). Regarding claim 3, Bohn discloses wherein, in the folded state of the portable data processing device, the first housing and the second housing overlap with a space in between (see space between 438 and 442 in fig. 4). The remainder of the claim is rejected in the same manner as written for claim 1 above. Claim 4 is rejected in the same manner as written for claim 2 above. Regarding claim 5, Bohn discloses a first conducting member (508, fig. 5) connecting the first housing (516, fig. 5) and the second housing (518, fig. 5); a second connecting member (514, fig. 5) overlapping with the with the first connecting member (see fig. 5); wherein the first connecting member comprises a first region overlapping with the display panel and not overlapping with either the first housing or the second housing (see fig. 5), wherein the second connecting member comprises a first region overlapping with the third display region, a second region overlapping with the first housing, and a third region overlapping with the second housing (see 514, fig. 5; wherein 514 overlaps the first housing 516 and second housing 518 and third display area above 508), wherein the second connecting member comprises a metal (para. 31, 19). The remainder of the claim is rejected in the same manner as written for claims 1-2 above. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims have been considered but are moot in view of new grounds of rejection. See new citations above. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBIN J MISHLER whose telephone number is (571)270-7251. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:00-5:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, NITIN PATEL can be reached on (571)272-7677. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBIN J MISHLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2628
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 25, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 14, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598714
LOCKING STRUCTURE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596453
TOUCH SENSOR AND A METHOD FOR DETECTING A USER'S TOUCH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585351
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12568688
DISPLAY DEVICE AND TILED DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567184
VIDEO PROCESSING METHOD, APPARATUS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+5.9%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month