Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/959,660

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING A DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Examiner
TUNG, DAVID
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
355 granted / 575 resolved
At TC average
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species I [figures 3-4, corresponding to claims 1-9 & 19] in the reply filed on 11/19/2025 is acknowledged. Claims 10-18 & 20 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 11/19/2025. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 11/26/2024 is being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kawabe (US 20080150839). As to claim 1, Kawabe discloses a display device [abstract] comprising: a display panel (organic el panel 4) [figs. 1-2 & para. 26 & 29] including a plurality of pixels (pixels 7) [figs. 1-2 & para. 29 & 26]; a data driver (output processor 3) [fig. 1 & para. 26-27 & 29] configured to apply data voltages to the plurality of pixels based on a data signal (image data) [para. 26-27]; a sensing driver (current measuring section 5) [figs. 1 & 4 & para. 37 & 54-56] configured to receive sensing current from at least one pixel of the plurality of pixels and to output sensing data based on the sensing current [figs. 1 & 4 & para. 37 & 54-56]; a non-volatile memory circuit (reference current data storing section 22) [fig. 4 & para. 54-57] configured to store the sensing data as stored sensing data; and a driving controller (supply controller 20) [figs. 1 & 4 & para. 54-56 & 38] configured to output the data signal to the data driver and to store the sensing data received from the sensing driver, wherein the driving controller is configured to determine a difference between the stored sensing data and the sensing data by comparing the stored sensing data with the sensing data (pixel current data storing section 23 & reference current data storing section 22 are compared via comparator 24) [fig. 4 & para. 54-57 & 41], and wherein the non-volatile memory circuit is configured to store the stored sensing data which is the same as the sensing data as stored compensation data [fig. 4 & para. 54-57]. As to claim 2, Kawabe discloses the display device of claim 1, wherein the driving controller compares the stored sensing data with the sensing data by determining whether values obtained by subtracting the sensing data from the stored sensing data are 0 (when no more differences occur) [para. 41]. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 19 is allowed. Claims 3-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: As to claim 19, the prior art fails to teach or suggest, “storing the sensing data as dummy sensing data in a dummy storage circuit; comparing the dummy sensing data with the stored sensing data; performing a deleting operation of the stored sensing data, a storing operation of a fail signal, and an outputting operation of an error signal when the dummy sensing data are inconsistent with the stored sensing data; and storing the stored sensing data as stored compensation data in the non-volatile memory circuit when the dummy sensing data and the stored sensing data are same, wherein comparison between the stored sensing data and the dummy sensing data is performed by determining whether values obtained by subtracting the sensing data from the stored sensing data are 0”, as claimed. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee et al. (US 20180012543). Mizukoshi (US 20160078813). Pyun et al. (US 20220013049). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID TUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-3385. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 10:00AM - 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at (571)-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID TUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603413
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603062
IMAGE DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597399
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592181
PIXEL CIRCUIT AND MICRO LED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592201
GATE DRIVER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month