Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/961,213

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANIPULATING TISSUE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Nov 26, 2024
Examiner
NEGRELLIRODRIGUEZ, CHRISTINA
Art Unit
3773
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
909 granted / 1024 resolved
+18.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1054
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§102
59.2%
+19.2% vs TC avg
§112
16.2%
-23.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1024 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 29-48 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Pandya et al. (U.S. Publication No.2013/0331644 A1; hereinafter “Pandya”). Regarding claim 29, Pandya discloses an apparatus comprising: a display system configured to display an image of tissue in a user interface; and a control system communicatively coupled to the display system (para.0047), wherein the control system is configured to: display a tissue control point graphical element (displaying a coordinate system in the camera view, as shown in Figure 17a, see also para.0162) over the image of tissue (Figure 17a); receive an input that moves the tissue control point graphical element within the user interface (para.0037); and operate an instrument physically associated with the tissue, based on the received input that moves the tissue control point graphical element, to thereby manipulate the tissue (the user can correspondingly move the master controller in desired X, Y and Z directions, see para.0162). Regarding claim 30, Pandya further discloses wherein movement of the tissue control point graphical element based on the input comprises at least one of a left translation, a right translation, an upward translation, a downward translation, an inward translation, an outward translation, or a rotation of the tissue control point graphical element (see para.0085 and Figure 7). Regarding claim 31, Pandya further discloses an input device, wherein the input is received through the input device (para.0037). Regarding claim 32 Pandya further discloses wherein the input device comprises at least one of a touchscreen, a gesture tracking system, a gaze tracking system, a hand control device, a teleoperated device, or a mouse (para.0037). Regarding claim 33, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to compute a path of movement for the instrument that both corresponds to movement of the tissue control point graphical element and meets predefined criteria (para.0115-0118). Regarding claim 34, Pandya further discloses wherein movement of the tissue control point graphical element comprises at least one of a translation of the tissue control point graphical element or a rotation of the tissue control point graphical element relative to the image (para.0071 and 0075). Regarding claim 35, Pandya further discloses wherein manipulation of the tissue comprises at least one of a retraction of the tissue, a translation of the tissue, or a twisting of the tissue (para.0085). Regarding claim 36, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to generate a haptic feedback response in response to operation of the instrument (para.0071-0073). Regarding claim 37, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to compute a path of movement for the instrument that prevents the instrument from having an unintended interaction with another object (para.0115-0118). Regarding claim 38, Pandya further discloses wherein the tissue control point graphical element is offset from a position of the instrument in the image (para.0115-0118). Regarding claim 39, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to determine an initial location for the tissue control point graphical element based on the input (para.0071-0073). Regarding claim 40, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to receive an initial location input through an input device after a tip of the instrument has engaged the tissue and responsive to receiving the initial location input, determining an initial location for the tissue control point graphical element based on a location at which the tip of the instrument has engaged the tissue (para.0071-0073). Regarding claim 41, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to determine a two-dimensional location for the tissue control point graphical element within the image; and map the two-dimensional location to a three-dimensional location with respect to a field of view of an imaging device that provides the image (para.0140). Regarding claim 42, Pandya further discloses wherein the instrument is a first instrument and wherein the control system is further configured to activate a selected mode that locks a position of a second instrument with respect to a reference coordinate system and enables the input to be received for the tissue control point graphical element (para.0043). Regarding claim 43, Pandya further discloses wherein the control system is further configured to receive the input that moves the tissue control point graphical element within the user interface through an input device when the selected mode has been activated, wherein the input device controls movement of the first instrument when the selected mode is activated and controls movement of the second instrument when the selected mode is not activated (para.0043-0044). Regarding claim 44, Pandya further discloses the instrument (para.0071). Regarding claim 45, Pandya discloses an apparatus comprising: a display system configured to display an image of tissue in a user interface; and a control system communicatively coupled to the display system (para.0047), wherein the control system is configured to: display a virtual object representing a tissue control point over an image of the tissue in a user interface (para.0072), wherein the virtual object is offset from a position of a first instrument (para.0115-0118); operate a second instrument to move a proxy geometry representing the second instrument into contact with the virtual object and impart a force on the virtual object (para.0043-0044); operate the first instrument based on the force applied to the virtual object to thereby manipulate the tissue (para.0043-0044); and generate a haptic feedback response at the second instrument in response to operation of the first instrument (para.0071-0073). Regarding claim 46, Pandya further discloses an input device, wherein an input received through the input device operates the second instrument to move the proxy geometry representing the second instrument (para.0037). Regarding claim 47, Pandya further discloses wherein the input device comprises at least one of a touchscreen, a gesture tracking system, a gaze tracking system, a hand control device, a teleoperated device, or a mouse (para.0037). Regarding claim 48, Pandya further discloses wherein the haptic feedback response is applied to the input device (para.0071-0073). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Atarot et al. U.S. Patent No.11,547,285 B2 Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Christina Negrelli whose telephone number is 571-270-7389. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday, between 8:00am to 4:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, please contact the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Robert, at (571) 272-4719. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINA NEGRELLI/ Examiner, Art Unit 3773 /JACQUELINE T JOHANAS/ Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3773
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 26, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 13, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Apr 02, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 02, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12593970
Medical Stroboscope System
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12575946
PATIENT-MATCHED MODULAR IMPLANTS AND INSTRUMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575862
SACROILIAC FUSION IMPLANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575861
LOCKING COUPLER DEVICE FOR SPINE ALIGNMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575938
SPINAL IMPLANT SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1024 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month