Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/963,759

MEMORY DEVICE FOR PERFORMING PROGRAM OPERATION AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §112§Other
Filed
Nov 29, 2024
Priority
May 29, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0070172
Examiner
BASHAR, MOHAMMED A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
SK hynix Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
95%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 95% — above average
95%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 674 resolved
+35.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
69.9%
+29.9% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 674 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §Other
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement Acknowledgment is made of Applicant’s Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) form PTO-1449. These IDS has been considered. Foreign Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant's claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d). The certified copy has been placed in the file of record. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claims 1-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. l12(b) as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 1, 2, 8, 12 recites “the memory cell” where the scope related to said limitation is deemed indefinite. Because previous limitation “a plurality of memory cells” or “selected memory cells” or “memory cells connected to one or more word lines” clearly indicate multiple cell but the limitation “the memory cell” is specific single cell which is very unclear and indefinite. Claim 1, 2, 8, 12 recites “the memory cells connected to the one or more adjacent word lines” where the scope related to said limitation is deemed indefinite. Because previous limitation “memory cells connected to one or more word lines adjacent to the selected word line” clearly indicate two scenario: a) memory cells connected to one word line adjacent to the selected word line. b) memory cells connected to more word lines adjacent to the selected word line. However, the limitation “the memory cells connected to the one or more adjacent word lines” is not clear where adjacent word line can be single word line or multiple word line but “adjacent word lines” only indicate multiple word line. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. See attachment. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMED A BASHAR whose telephone number is 469-295-9277. The examiner can normally be reached on 9am-5pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Richard T Elms can be reached on 5712721869. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MOHAMMED A BASHAR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2824
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 29, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 10, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12749551
SEMICONDUCTOR SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FAIL LOCATION
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12744104
APPARATUSES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR STORING MEMORY METADATA
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12744064
MEMORY DEVICE RELATED TO SIGNAL TRANSMISSION
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12731643
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTABLE TOP SELECT GATE CONTROL
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12731653
NON-VOLATILE MEMORY SYSTEM AND DATA RECOVER READ OPERATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
95%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+3.3%)
1y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 674 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month