Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/967,551

Plasma Processing Apparatus and Method for Measuring Resonance Frequency

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 03, 2024
Priority
Jun 09, 2022 — JP 2022-093512 +1 more
Examiner
SATHIRAJU, SRINIVAS
Art Unit
2844
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The University Of Shiga Prefecture
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allowance Rate
728 granted / 820 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
848
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
62.6%
+22.6% vs TC avg
§102
9.9%
-30.1% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 820 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Non Final Rejection Notice Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1, 2, and 7-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US7908104 B2 by Tetsuka et al (Tetsuka). Referring to claim 1 Tetsuka Fig 1-10 teaches: A plasma processing apparatus (Fig 1 and Col 5 lines 27-42) comprising: a processing chamber (item10 ) that provides a processing space ( See the Fig 1 the space between the vacuum window 12 and substrate 7 is regarded as processing space) where plasma processing is performed (see col 5 lines 27 to 32) ; an electromagnetic wave generator (item 32) configured to generate electromagnetic waves to be supplied to the processing space (see col 5 lines 55-58); PNG media_image1.png 472 596 media_image1.png Greyscale a resonating structure disposed in the processing chamber and formed by arranging a plurality of resonators that are capable of resonating with a magnetic field component of the electromagnetic waves and have sizes smaller than a wavelength of the electromagnetic waves; (In another embodiment Tetsuka teaches using waves lengths half the wave length for determining the resonance frequency see col 7 lines 5 to 17) a measurement part (item 3 measurement device unit col 5 lines 47-48) configured to measure, for each frequency, a power of the electromagnetic waves traveling from the electromagnetic wave generator to the resonating structure and a power of transmitted waves, reflected waves, or scattered waves of the electromagnetic waves in the resonating structure (see col 5, 47-58, col 6. lines 1-6 where Tetsuka teaches measuring unit measures the frequency spectrum of the incident power; col 8 lines 1-17) ; and PNG media_image2.png 718 520 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 570 520 media_image3.png Greyscale a controller (item 31 control unit col 5 lines 47-50), wherein prior to execution of the plasma processing (col 5 lines 59-65), the controller performs: a measurement process for measuring the power of the electromagnetic waves and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves with the measurement part, and a calculation process for calculating a resonance frequency of the resonating structure based on frequency distribution of characteristic values of the resonating structure, which are calculated from the power of the electromagnetic waves and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves. (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 9 lines 19 to 56 where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data ) Hence, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of instant application to incorporate various embodiments of the Tetsuka in to a single embodiment in order to introduce resonance at various locations in the processing space in order to reduce the reflected waves (See Tetsuka col 8 lines 6 to 11). Referring to claim 2 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, wherein during the plasma processing, the controller controls the electromagnetic wave generator to generate the electromagnetic waves including a frequency component in a target frequency band higher than the resonance frequency, thereby performing a resonance process in which the electromagnetic waves resonate with the resonating structure. (See Fig 1 high frequency electrode 13 and col 7 lines 18 -36 where Tetsuka teaches achieving a high frequency resonance power up to 3 GHz). Referring to claim 7 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: a waveguide ( item 13 electrode acts as a wave guide see col 5 lines 33-42) configured to guide the electromagnetic waves generated by the electromagnetic wave generator (item 32) to the processing space, wherein the measurement part measures, for each frequency, the power of the electromagnetic waves propagating through the waveguide and the power of the reflected waves propagating through the waveguide (Col 5 lines 59- 65).. Referring to claim 8 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the plasma processing apparatus of claim 1, wherein the resonating structure is disposed along a first surface of a member (dielectric window item 12) disposed with the first surface facing the processing space .(col 6 lines 42 to 45). Referring to claim 9 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the plasma processing apparatus of claim 8, further comprising: a dielectric ( ( item 12 vacuum window see col 5 lines 33-42) disposed with the first surface facing the processing space (See Fig 1, items 12, 13 plasma processing space between item 12 and item substrate 7), and an electromagnetic wave supply part (item 32) configured to supply the electromagnetic waves to the processing space via the dielectric, wherein the resonating structure is disposed along the first surface of the dielectric (Col 6 lines 42-48). Referring to claim 10 Tetsuka Fig 1-10 teaches: A plasma processing apparatus (Fig 1 and Col 5 lines 27-42) comprising: a processing chamber (item10 ) that provides a processing space ( See the Fig 1 the space between the vacuum window 12 and substrate 7 is regarded as processing space) where plasma processing is performed (see col 5 lines 27 to 32) ; an electromagnetic wave generator (item 32) configured to generate electromagnetic waves to be supplied to the processing space (see col 5 lines 55-58); PNG media_image1.png 472 596 media_image1.png Greyscale a resonating structure disposed in the processing chamber and formed by arranging a plurality of resonators that are capable of resonating with a magnetic field component of the electromagnetic waves and have sizes smaller than a wavelength of the electromagnetic waves; (In another embodiment Tetsuka teaches using waves lengths half the wave length for determining the resonance frequency see col 7 lines 5 to 17) a measurement part (item 3 measurement device unit col 5 lines 47-48) configured to measure, for each frequency, a power of transmitted waves, reflected waves, or scattered waves of the electromagnetic waves in the resonating structure (see col 5, 47-58, col 6. lines 1-6 where Tetsuka teaches measuring unit measures the frequency spectrum of the incident power; col 8 lines 1-17) ; and PNG media_image2.png 718 520 media_image2.png Greyscale PNG media_image3.png 570 520 media_image3.png Greyscale a controller (item 31 control unit col 5 lines 47-50), wherein prior to execution of the plasma processing (col 5 lines 59-65), the controller performs: a measurement process for measuring the power of the electromagnetic waves and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves with the measurement part, (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 6 lines 18 -where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data) and a calculation process ( item 36 processing unit Col 5 lines 47-58) for calculating a resonance frequency of the resonating structure based on frequency distribution of characteristic values of the resonating structure, which are calculated from the power of the electromagnetic waves and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves. (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 9 lines 19 to 56 where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data ) Hence, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of instant application to incorporate various embodiments of the Tetsuka in to a single embodiment in order to introduce resonance at various locations in the processing space in order to reduce the reflected waves (See Tetsuka col 8 lines 6 to 11). Referring to claim 11 Referring to claim 1 Tetsuka Fig 1-10 teaches A method for measuring (See claim 12) a resonance frequency of a resonating structure in a plasma processing apparatus (Fig 1 and Col 5 lines 27-42), wherein the plasma processing apparatus includes: a processing chamber (item10 ) that provides a processing space ( See the Fig 1 the space between the vacuum window 12 and substrate 7 is regarded as processing space) where plasma processing is performed (see col 5 lines 27 to 32) ; an electromagnetic wave generator (item 32) configured to generate electromagnetic waves to be supplied to the processing space (see col 5 lines 55-58); PNG media_image1.png 472 596 media_image1.png Greyscale a resonating structure disposed in the processing chamber and formed by arranging a plurality of resonators that are capable of resonating with a magnetic field component of the electromagnetic waves and have sizes smaller than a wavelength of the electromagnetic waves; (In another embodiment Tetsuka teaches using waves lengths half the wave length for determining the resonance frequency see col 7 lines 5 to 17) a measurement part (item 3 measurement device unit col 5 lines 47-48) configured to measure, for each frequency, a power of transmitted waves, reflected waves, or scattered waves of the electromagnetic waves in the resonating structure (see col 5, 47-58, col 6. lines 1-6 where Tetsuka teaches measuring unit measures the frequency spectrum of the incident power; col 8 lines 1-17) ; the method comprising: measuring, prior to execution of the plasma processing, for each frequency, the power of the electromagnetic waves, and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves by the measurement part (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 6 lines 18 -where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data); and calculating the resonance frequency of the resonating structure based on frequency distribution of characteristic values of the resonating structure ( item 36 processing unit Col 5 lines 47-58), which are calculated from the power of the electromagnetic waves and the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves. (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 9 lines 19 to 56 where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data). Hence, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of instant application to incorporate various embodiments of the Tetsuka in to a single embodiment in order to introduce resonance at various locations in the processing space in order to reduce the reflected waves (See Tetsuka col 8 lines 6 to 11). Referring to claim 12 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the method of claim 11, further comprising: controlling, during the plasma processing, the electromagnetic wave generator to generate the electromagnetic waves including a frequency component in a target frequency band higher than the resonance frequency, thereby allowing the electromagnetic waves to resonate with the resonating structure. (See Fig 1 high frequency electrode 13 and col 7 lines 18 -36 where Tetsuka teaches achieving a high frequency resonance power up to 3 GHz). Referring to claim 13 Referring to claim 1 Tetsuka Fig 1-10 teaches: A method for measuring a resonance frequency of a resonating structure in a plasma processing apparatus (Fig 1 and Col 5 lines 27-42), wherein the plasma processing apparatus includes: a processing chamber (item10 ) that provides a processing space ( See the Fig 1 the space between the vacuum window 12 and substrate 7 is regarded as processing space) where plasma processing is performed (see col 5 lines 27 to 32) ; an electromagnetic wave generator (item 32) configured to generate electromagnetic waves to be supplied to the processing space (see col 5 lines 55-58); a resonating structure disposed in the processing chamber and formed by arranging a plurality of resonators that are capable of resonating with a magnetic field component of the electromagnetic waves and have sizes smaller than a wavelength of the electromagnetic waves; (In another embodiment Tetsuka teaches using waves lengths half the wave length for determining the resonance frequency see col 7 lines 5 to 17) a measurement part (item 3 measurement device unit col 5 lines 47-48) configured to measure, for each frequency, a power of transmitted waves, reflected waves, or scattered waves of the electromagnetic waves in the resonating structure (see col 5, 47-58, col 6. lines 1-6 where Tetsuka teaches measuring unit measures the frequency spectrum of the incident power; col 8 lines 1-17) ; the method comprising: measuring, prior to execution of the plasma processing, for each frequency, the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves by the measurement part (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 6 lines 18 -where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data);; and calculating the resonance frequency of the resonating structure based on frequency distribution of the power of the transmitted waves, the reflected waves, or the scattered waves( item 36 processing unit Col 5 lines 47-58),. (See Fig 5, 6 in another embodiment Tetsuka teaches col 9 lines 19 to 56 where the measurement unit calculating the measured frequency data). Hence, it would have been obvious to a person with ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of instant application to incorporate various embodiments of the Tetsuka in to a single embodiment in order to introduce resonance at various locations in the processing space in order to reduce the reflected waves (See Tetsuka col 8 lines 6 to 11). Referring to claim 14 Tetsuka’s modified reference teaches the method of claim 13, further comprising: controlling, during the plasma processing, the electromagnetic wave generator to generate the electromagnetic waves including a frequency component in a target frequency band higher than the resonance frequency, thereby allowing the electromagnetic waves to resonate with the resonating structure. (See Fig 1 high frequency electrode 13 and col 7 lines 18 -36 where Tetsuka teaches achieving a high frequency resonance power up to 3 GHz). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-6 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Claims 1-14 are rejected Over Prior Art. Claims 3-6 are objected. The prior of art made of record and not relied upon is considered to pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. Applicants are directed to consider additional pertinent prior art included on the notice of references cited PTOL 892 attached here with. The examiner has pointed out particular references contained in the prior art of record within the body of this action for the convenience of the Applicants. Although the specified citations are representative of the teachings in the art and are applied to the specific limitations within the individual claim other passages and figures may apply. Applicant, in preparing the response should consider fully the entire reference as potentially teaching all or part of the claimed invention as well as the context of the passage as taught by the prior art or disclosed by the examiner. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SRINIVAS SATHIRAJU whose telephone number is (571)272-4250. The examiner can normally be reached 8:30AM-5.30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ALEXANDER H TANINGCO can be reached at 571-272-8048. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. SRINIVAS . SATHIRAJU Primary Examiner Art Unit 2844 04/17/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 03, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 07, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683123
PULSED VOLTAGE WAVEFORM BIASING OF PLASMA
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684673
LIGHTING SYSTEM
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683124
SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS USING PLASMA PHASE SHIFT
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676293
Plasma Processing Apparatus and Plasma Control Method
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676290
PLASMA GENERATOR AND METHOD OF USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+6.1%)
2y 0m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 820 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month