Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/967,804

HYBRID TRANSMISSION COMPONENT FOR A GAS TURBINE ENGINE

Non-Final OA §102§103§112
Filed
Dec 04, 2024
Priority
Dec 19, 2023 — GB 2319474.9
Examiner
BINDA, GREGORY JOHN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Rolls-Royce plc
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
1480 granted / 1831 resolved
+20.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1854
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§102
38.2%
-1.8% vs TC avg
§112
37.8%
-2.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1831 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103 §112
Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of the hybrid transmission component shown in Figs. 2-4 (Species 1) in the reply filed on August 6, 2026 is acknowledged. Claims 8-15 & 18 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on August 6, 2026. Drawings The drawings are objected to because they fail to show: Each tooth 120 tapers from root 122 to the tip 124 as recited in claim 6. The root 122 of each spline 120 forming an interference fit with the composite body 102 as recited in claim 7. Gas turbine engine 10 including hybrid transmission component 100 as recited in claim 17. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.75(i) because elements of the claim are not separated by line indentation. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 1-7, 15 & 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1, lines 24-25 recites the limitation, “the leading end of each spline tooth is configured to cut the composite body during joining”. It is unclear what feature(s) besides those previously recited configure the leading end 126 to cut the composite body 102. Claim 17 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claims 1-3, 6-7, 15 & 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Reinhart, US 8,920,064. At Figs. 1-6, Reinhart discloses a hybrid transmission component (10) for a gas turbine engine (see “motor” at col. 1, line 16), the hybrid transmission component comprising: a composite body (20); and a metallic coupling (22) joined with the composite body and defining a longitudinal axis along its length, the metallic coupling comprising an axial end surface (40), a circumferential surface (42) circumferentially extending about the longitudinal axis, and a plurality of spline teeth (44) extending from the circumferential surface and angularly separated from each other about the longitudinal axis (see Fig. 3), wherein each spline tooth from the plurality of spline teeth comprises a root (see “base” at col. 3, line 25) disposed adjacent to the circumferential surface, a tip (col. 3, line 26) distal to the circumferential surface, and a leading end (46) disposed proximally to the axial end surface, wherein each spline tooth extends radially from the root to the tip with respect to the longitudinal axis (see Figs. 1 & 2B), wherein each spline tooth extends axially from the leading end along the longitudinal axis, the leading end of each spline tooth comprising a curved surface (52) extending from the root and a planar surface (see also “surfaces that are tangent” at col. 3, lines 43-44) extending from the curved surface to the tip, wherein the curved surface curves inwardly from the root away from the axial end surface, such that the curved surface is concave with respect to the axial end surface (see Fig. 2B), wherein the planar surface is inclined obliquely to the longitudinal axis by a rake angle (see Fig. 2B), wherein, during joining (100) of the composite body with the metallic coupling, the composite body is moved relative (110) to the metallic coupling in a joining direction that extends away from the axial end surface along the longitudinal axis, and wherein the leading end of each spline tooth is configured (106) to cut the composite body during joining of the composite body with the metallic coupling, wherein the curved surface (52) is a circular arc having a transition radius (col. 3, lines 41-42), wherein the metallic coupling further comprises a chamfered surface (see Fig. 4) extending between the axial end surface and the circumferential surface, such that the curved surface of the leading end of each spline tooth extends from the chamfered surface, and wherein the chamfered surface is inclined obliquely to the longitudinal axis by a lead angle, wherein each spline tooth tapers from the root to the tip (col. 3, lines 24-26 & 39-41), wherein the root of each spline tooth forms an interference fit (116) with the composite body, wherein Fig. 3 shows the metallic coupling (22) is annular, such that the circumferential surface (42) is a radially inner circumferential surface of the metallic coupling, and Fig. 1 shows the composite body (20) is at least partially received within the radially inner circumferential surface. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 4-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Reinhart. As noted above, Reinhart discloses the hybrid transmission component (10) includes lead and rake angles but does not expressly disclose the lead angle is from 30 degrees to 45 degrees. and the rake angle is from 55 degrees to 85 degrees. However, it would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to make the lead angle from 30 degrees to 45 degrees. and the rake angle from 55 degrees to 85 degrees, since it has been held where the general conditions of a claim are disclosed in the prior art, discovering the optimum or workable ranges involves only routine skill in the art. In re Kulling, 897 F.2d 1147, 14 USPQ2d 1056 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Each of Dunn, Mazzeo, Ikemoto, Digel and Matt discloses a hybrid transmission component. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Greg Binda whose telephone number is (571)272-7077. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30-5:30 et. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Troutman can be reached at 571-270-3654. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Greg Binda/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3679
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 04, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12747760
STROKING AND ARTICULATING CONSTANT VELOCITY JOINT ASSEMBLY
3y 9m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747761
TORQUE LIMITER, TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING SAID TORQUE LIMITER
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12747759
TRIPOD TYPE CONSTANT VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12738884
CONNECTION SYSTEM OF A TRANSMISSION ROD FOR SOLAR TRACKERS
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736088
TRIPOD TYPE CONSTANT VELOCITY UNIVERSAL JOINT
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+11.7%)
2y 6m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1831 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month