Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/971,174

DRIVE DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Priority
Aug 11, 2022 — JP 2022-128558 +1 more
Examiner
STEFANON, JUSTIN
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 51% of resolved cases
51%
Career Allowance Rate
96 granted / 188 resolved
-8.9% vs TC avg
Strong +48% interview lift
Without
With
+48.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
242
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§112
25.0%
-15.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 188 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Species I in the reply filed on 08/11/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the search for the subject matter of any one species would encompass a search for the subject matter of the remaining species. This is not found persuasive because, as set forth in the requirement for restriction, serious search and/or examination burden is established when, as in the instant case, different search strategies or queries are required in examination. See MPEP 808.02 The different types of filters use substantially different internal structures and achieve substantially different results and thus are not prima facie obvious variants of one another. Any search for one of them would require the use of search queries and careful consideration of search results which would not be applicable to the others. Of course, upon the allowance of a generic claim, applicant is entitled to consideration of claims to non-elected species which depend therefrom. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 13-15 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 08/11/2026. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/31/2025 and 11/03/2025 are being considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 1, 7-12, and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by MEISSNER - DE 202015106371. Regarding claim 1, MEISSNER discloses a drive device 13 to be provided to a moving object 2, which is configured to move by rotation of a rotary body 5 [0041], and to be driven by electric power to rotate the rotary body 5 [0039], the drive device further comprising: a motor 13 configured to be supplied with electric power [0006]; an inverter (not shown, connected to heat sink 15; see [0020, 0046]) configured to convert the electric power supplied to the motor 13; an accommodating housing 1 (fuselage 1 is a housing as broadly claimed) accommodating at least one of the motor 13 and the inverter (Fig. 1); a housing inlet port 4 provided in the accommodating housing 1 and configured to allow cooling air, which is to cool an inside of the accommodating housing 1 [0015, 0020], to flow from an outside of the accommodating housing 1 to the inside; a housing outlet port 22 provided in the accommodating housing 1 and configured to allow the cooling air to flow out to the outside of the accommodating housing 1 (Fig. 1); and a foreign matter restriction portion 18 including a restriction inlet port 6, which is in communication with the housing inlet port 4, and configured to restrict foreign matter, which enters the restriction inlet port 6, from passing therethrough, and the restriction inlet port 6 is open to a downwind side of rotation wind generated by rotating the rotary body 5 (Fig. 1). PNG media_image1.png 365 486 media_image1.png Greyscale Regarding claim 7, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, wherein the housing inlet port 4 and the housing outlet port 22 are provided to allow the cooling air, which flows from the housing inlet port 4 to the inside of the accommodating housing 1, to pass through a space accommodating the motor 13, then pass through a space accommodating the inverter, and flow out from the housing outlet port 22 (Fig. 1; i.e. by the cooling air flow being divided). Regarding claim 8, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, wherein the housing inlet port 4 and the housing outlet port 22 are provided to allow the cooling air, which flows from the housing inlet port 4 to the inside of the accommodating housing 1, to pass through a space accommodating the inverter, then pass through a space accommodating the motor 13, and flow out from the housing outlet port 22 (Fig. 1; i.e. by the cooling air flow being divided). Regarding claim 9, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, wherein the housing inlet port 4 and the housing outlet port 22 are provided to allow the cooling air, which flows from the housing inlet port 4 to the inside of the accommodating housing 1, to pass through only one of a space accommodating the motor 13 and a space accommodating the inverter and flow out from the housing outlet port 22 (Fig. 1; i.e. after the cooling air flow being divided). Regarding claim 10, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, further comprising: a cooling air fan configured to cause the cooling air, which flows into the housing inlet port 4, to flow out from the housing outlet port 22 [0048]. Regarding claim 11, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, wherein the foreign matter restriction portion 18 includes a labyrinth structure portion having a labyrinth passage 18 that is in communication with the housing inlet port 4 and is bent to restrict entry of the foreign matter [0049]. Regarding claim 12, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 11, wherein the labyrinth structure portion includes a labyrinth passage inlet port 12 configured to allow the cooling air to flow into the labyrinth passage 18, and the labyrinth passage inlet port 12 is provided to face a downwind side of rotation wind generated by rotation of a rotary body 5 (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 16, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, wherein the drive device is to be provided to a flight vehicle and to be driven by electric power to cause the flight vehicle to fly [0013]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over MEISSNER in view of YABE – JP 2020102979 (previously disclosed; full translation in IDS filed 1/31/2025). Regarding claim 2, MEISSNER discloses the drive device according to claim 1, further comprising: an inverter device including the inverter and an inverter housing 14 included in the accommodating housing 1 and accommodating the inverter. However, MEISSNER does not teach the inverter device includes a switch component configured to convert the electric power, and a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component, and the switch component and the capacitor component are provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component. YABE teaches a drive device comprising an inverter device including a switch component 17b configured to convert the electric power [0033], and a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component 17b [0015], and the switch component 17b and the capacitor component are provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component 17b [0016-0017]. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the drive device of MEISSNER with the inverter device including a switch component configured to convert the electric power, and a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component, and the switch component and the capacitor component are provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component, similar to YABE. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to improve the cooling efficiency of the inverter by putting the cooling medium in contact with the surface portion of the power circuit unit in the inverter, as taught by YABE [0007.] Regarding claim 3, MEISSNER in view of YABE teaches the drive device according to claim 2, wherein YABE teaches the inverter device includes a wiring board 20 having an outer peripheral end extending along an inner wall surface 26 of an inverter housing 21 and mounted with the capacitor component [0015], and the switch component 17b is provided between the capacitor component and the inner wall surface 26, such that the cooling air flowing toward the inner wall surface 26 along the wiring board 20 cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component 17b (Fig. 1). PNG media_image2.png 573 447 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, MEISSNER in view of YABE teaches the drive device according to claim 3, wherein YABE teaches the outer peripheral end and the inner wall surface 26 define a board gap therebetween to allow the cooling air to flow therethrough, and the switch component 17b is provided, such that the cooling air flows through the board gap after cooling the switch component 17b (Fig. 1). Regarding claim 6, MEISSNER in view of YABE teaches the drive device according to claim 3, wherein YABE teaches the switch component 17b is provided on the inner wall surface 26, such that heat of the switch component is transferred to the inner wall surface (i.e. via plastic material 25). Regarding claim 4, MEISSNER discloses a drive device to be driven by electric power, the drive device comprising: a motor 13 configured to be supplied with electric power [0006]; an inverter (not shown, connected to heat sink 15; see [0020, 0046]) configured to convert the electric power supplied to the motor 13; an accommodating housing 1 (fuselage 1 is a housing as broadly claimed) accommodating at least one of the motor 13 and the inverter; a housing inlet port 4 provided in the accommodating housing 1 and configured to allow cooling air, which is to cool an inside of the accommodating housing 1 [0015, 0020], to flow from an outside of the accommodating housing 1 to the inside; a housing outlet port 22 provided in the accommodating housing 1 and configured to allow the cooling air to flow out to the outside of the accommodating housing 1 (Fig. 1); a foreign matter restriction portion 18 configured to restrict foreign matter from entering the inside of the accommodating housing 1 from the housing inlet port 4; and an inverter device including the inverter and an inverter housing 14 included in the accommodating housing 1 and accommodating the inverter, wherein However, MEISSNER does not teach the inverter device including a switch component configured to convert the electric power, a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component, and a wiring board having an outer peripheral end extending along an inner wall surface of the inverter housing and mounted with the capacitor component, the capacitor component is provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component, and the switch component is provided between the capacitor component and the inner wall surface, such that the cooling air flowing toward the inner wall surface along the wiring board cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component. YABE teaches a drive device comprising an inverter device including a switch component 17b configured to convert the electric power [0033], a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component 17b [0015], and a wiring board 20 having an outer peripheral end extending along an inner wall surface 26 of an inverter housing 21 and mounted with the capacitor component [0015], and the switch component 17b and the capacitor component are provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component 17b [0016-0017], and the switch component 17b is provided between the capacitor component and the inner wall surface 26, such that the cooling air flowing toward the inner wall surface 26 along the wiring board 20 cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component 17b (Fig. 1). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to provide the drive device of MEISSNER with the inverter device including a switch component configured to convert the electric power, a capacitor component electrically connected to the switch component, and a wiring board having an outer peripheral end extending along an inner wall surface of the inverter housing and mounted with the capacitor component, the capacitor component is provided, such that the cooling air cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component, and the switch component is provided between the capacitor component and the inner wall surface, such that the cooling air flowing toward the inner wall surface along the wiring board cools the capacitor component, and then cools the switch component, similar to YABE. A person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains would have been motivated to make such modification in order to improve the cooling efficiency of the inverter by putting the cooling medium in contact with the surface portion of the power circuit unit in the inverter, as taught by YABE [0007.] Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US-20070222223-A1 Bagepalli discloses an air-cooled motor with labyrinth air flow path (Fig. 9); US-20090206709-A1 Kakuda discloses an inverter breather with labyrinth air flow path 83e; US-20230192310-A1 Fukazu discloses a motor inverter air cooling system with air flow W driven by propeller 36 and a downstream inlet 74i. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN STEFANON whose telephone number is (703)756-4648. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday and alternate Fridays 8AM - 5PM EDT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Oluseye Iwarere can be reached at (571) 270-5112. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN STEFANON/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /OLUSEYE IWARERE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12744438
ELECTRIC MOTOR HAVING ROTOR AND SQUIRREL CAGE WINDING
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12494684
ROTOR OF AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
2y 3m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 12451742
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COOLING A ROTOR ASSEMBLY
3y 2m to grant Granted Oct 21, 2025
Patent 12316190
CASE STRUCTURE OF IN-WHEEL MOTOR
2y 10m to grant Granted May 27, 2025
Patent 9650015
BELT RETRACTOR FOR A VEHICLE SAFETY BELT
2y 8m to grant Granted May 16, 2017
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+48.0%)
3y 2m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 188 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month