Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/972,335

FAUCET WITH MULTIPLE PARALLEL PIVOTS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 06, 2024
Examiner
WILLIAMS, PATRICK C
Art Unit
3753
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Kohler Co.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
408 granted / 509 resolved
+10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+25.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
522
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
43.4%
+3.4% vs TC avg
§102
34.1%
-5.9% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 509 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-7, 9, 11-12, 14, 16-17, and 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang (US 6425149). Regarding claim 1, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “A directionally adjustable faucet, comprising: a first base section (topmost 100’); a second base section (middle 100’) coupled to the first base section (see FIG); a base rotational interface (joint at the leftmost end of base section, rotatable in FIG) disposed between the first base section and the second base section along a first plane (plane between top/middle 100’), the base rotational interface configured to actuate the second base section relative to the first base section (allows relative rotation); a plurality of conduit segments (lower 100’ and lower 120) operably coupled to the second base section (see FIG 10); and at least one conduit rotational interface (joint between lower 100’ and lower 120) disposed between the plurality of conduit segments along a second plane, the at least one conduit rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to each other (see rotation arrows in FIG 10), wherein the second plane is parallel with the first plane (FIG 10; all planes of rotation except the upper 120 about the static conduit are parallel planes of rotation at different heights).” Regarding claim 2, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the plurality of conduit segments (lower 100’ and lower 120) comprises two conduit segments and the at least one conduit rotational interface comprises one conduit rotational interface disposed between the two conduit segments (as defined above), wherein one of the two conduit segments is directly coupled to the second base section (directly coupled at top end).” Regarding claim 3, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein a conduit segment (lower 100’) of the plurality of conduit segments is coupled to the second base section (middle 100’) at a substantially right angle (coupling plane is perpendicular to the main longitudinal axes of 100’s).” Regarding claim 4, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the first base section and the second base section (upper and middle 100’) have the same or substantially the same cross-sectional shape and area (see FIG 10).” Regarding claim 6, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the first base section (topmost 100’) is coupled to a surface (120) and the first plane is parallel to the surface (plane is parallel to first horizontal longitudinal axis [it is an elbow] of 120).” Regarding claim 7, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the first base section (topmost 100’) is coupled to a surface (120) and the first plane is perpendicular to the surface (plane is perpendicular to second vertical longitudinal axis [it is an elbow] of 120).” Regarding claim 9, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “further comprising a pull-down sprayer (130, capable of being pulled down via joints at 100’s , 120s) coupled to a free end of the plurality of conduit segments (at bottom).” Regarding claim 11, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “A directionally adjustable primary or beverage faucet, comprising: a base section (segment above top 120); an outlet portion (top 100’) coupled to the base section (via 120); a plurality of conduit segments (lower 100’ and middle 100’) operably coupled to the outlet portion; a first rotational interface (joint at the leftmost end of outlet portion, rotatable in embodiments) disposed between the outlet portion and the plurality of conduit segments along a first plane (between 100’s), the first rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to the base section (via rotation); and a second rotational interface (between middle 100’ and lower 100’) disposed between the plurality of conduit segments along a second plane, the second rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to each other, wherein the second plane is parallel with the first plane (FIG 10; all planes of rotation except the upper 120 about the static conduit are parallel planes of rotation at different heights).” Regarding claim 12, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the outlet portion is coupled to the base section at a substantially right angle (coupling plane is perpendicular to the main longitudinal axes of 100’s).” Regarding claim 14, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the outlet portion (top 100’) and the plurality of conduit segments (middle and lower 100’) have the same or substantially the same cross-sectional shape and area (see FIG 10).” Regarding claim 16, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the first base section (topmost 100’) is coupled to a surface (120) and the first plane is parallel to the surface (plane is parallel to first horizontal longitudinal axis [it is an elbow] of 120).” Regarding claim 17, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “wherein the first base section (topmost 100’) is coupled to a surface (120) and the first plane is perpendicular to the surface (plane is perpendicular to second vertical longitudinal axis [it is an elbow] of 120).” Regarding claim 19, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “further comprising a pull-down sprayer (130, capable of being pulled down via joints at 100’s , 120s) coupled to a free end of a conduit segment of the plurality of conduit segments (at bottom).” Regarding claim 20, Wang (FIG 10) discloses “A directionally adjustable primary or beverage faucet, comprising: a first base section (upper static segment above top 120) coupled to a second base section (top 100’); and a plurality of conduit segments (middle and lower 100’s) operably coupled to the second base section, wherein the second base section is configured to actuate relative to the first base section (about rotation joint at 120), and wherein the plurality of conduit segments are configured to actuate (relative rotation read on “actuate”) relative to each other (see FIG 10).” Claim(s) 1-3, 5-6, 8, 10-13, 15-16, 18, and 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated Mueller et al (US 8061386). Regarding claim 1, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “A directionally adjustable faucet, comprising: a first base section (42, 48); a second base section (56, 68, 22, 76) coupled to the first base section; a base rotational interface (interaction between 56 and 48/42; Column 3 lines 5-12) disposed between the first base section and the second base section along a first plane (plane defined by top surface of 48), the base rotational interface configured to actuate the second base section relative to the first base section (ensures relative rotation of 56 relative to 42/48); a plurality of conduit segments (78, 82) operably coupled to the second base section (see FIG 2); and at least one conduit rotational interface (80) disposed between the plurality of conduit segments along a second plane (plane perpendicular to longitudinal axis of 80), the at least one conduit rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to each other, wherein the second plane is parallel with the first plane (see FIGs 1-2, plane rotations for 56 and 80 are parallel with height offset).” Regarding claim 2, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein the plurality of conduit segments comprises two conduit segments (78, 82) and the at least one conduit rotational interface (80) comprises one conduit rotational interface disposed between the two conduit segments, wherein one of the two conduit segments (78) is directly coupled to the second base section.” Regarding claim 3, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein a conduit segment (82) of the plurality of conduit segments is coupled to the second base section (76) (82 and 76 are connected via 78, 80) at a substantially right angle (perpendicular oriented via 78 elbow).” Regarding claim 5, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein the second base section (56, 68, 22, 76) further comprises a fluid control knob (22) configured to control fluid flow from the faucet.” Regarding claim 6, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein the first base section (42, 48) is coupled to a surface (38) and the first plane is parallel to the surface (see FIG 2).” Regarding claim 8, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein the plurality of conduit segments comprises a first conduit segment (78) and a second conduit segment (82), wherein the first conduit segment is coupled to a first fluid control knob (22, via 76) and the second conduit segment is coupled to a second fluid control knob (24, via 84), the first fluid control knob and the second fluid control knob each configured to control fluid flow from the faucet.” Regarding claim 10, Mueller (FIG 1-3) discloses “wherein the first base section (42, 48) is coupled to a mounting plate (38).” Regarding claim 11, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “A directionally adjustable primary or beverage faucet, comprising: a base section (160); an outlet portion (180) coupled to the base section; a plurality of conduit segments (76, 84) operably coupled to the outlet portion; a first rotational interface (80) disposed between the outlet portion and the plurality of conduit segments along a first plane (plane that 80 extends along), the first rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to the base section (Column 5 lines 26-33); and a second rotational interface (182) disposed between the plurality of conduit segments (between 76 and 84) along a second plane (plane that bisects 186), the second rotational interface configured to actuate the plurality of conduit segments relative to each other (Column 5 lines 26-33), wherein the second plane is parallel with the first plane (see FIG 5).” Regarding claim 12, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “wherein the outlet portion is coupled to the base section at a substantially right angle (see FIG 5).” Regarding claim 13, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “wherein the base section is coupled to a mounting plate (164).” Regarding claim 15, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “wherein the base section further comprises a first fluid control knob (174) configured to control fluid flow from the faucet.” Regarding claim 16, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “wherein the first base section (42, 48) is coupled to a surface (38) and the first plane is parallel to the surface (see FIG 2).” Regarding claim 18, Mueller (FIG 5) discloses “further comprising a second fluid control knob (178) coupled to a conduit segment of the plurality of conduit segments (via 88), the second control knob being configured to control fluid flow through the conduit segment.” Regarding claim 20, Mueller (FIGs 1-3) discloses “A directionally adjustable primary or beverage faucet, comprising: a first base section (42, 48) coupled to a second base section (56, 68, 22, 76); and a plurality of conduit segments (78, 82) operably coupled to the second base section, wherein the second base section is configured to actuate relative to the first base section (Column 3 lines 5-12), and wherein the plurality of conduit segments are configured to actuate relative to each other (via 80).” Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Devices similar to the application are disclosed by Erickson et al (US 20100176328), Zeng (US D954199), Chung (US 20190264849), Eads et al (US D853528), and de Swarte (US 20160145840). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PATRICK C WILLIAMS whose telephone number is (571)431-0767. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kenneth Rinehart can be reached at 571-272-4881. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PATRICK C WILLIAMS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3753
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2024
Application Filed
Jan 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601436
Genderless Aseptic Connector
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595858
INTEGRATED DOT PRESSURE PROTECTION VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588669
Method for Controlling Valves of a Spraying Boom of an Agricultural Spreading Machine
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586767
MULTI-PORT CROSS FLOW SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12584426
VARIABLE VALVE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+25.8%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 509 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month