Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/974,560

MECHANISMS THAT ENABLE A USER-CONFIGURABLE SLOT TYPE CONCATENATION GAME

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 09, 2024
Priority
Jul 09, 2021 — provisional 63/220,335 +2 more
Examiner
YEN, JASON TAHAI
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aristocrat Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
852 granted / 1107 resolved
+17.0% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
1145
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.5%
-10.5% vs TC avg
§103
29.7%
-10.3% vs TC avg
§102
13.0%
-27.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1107 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 1/17/25 was acknowledged. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Priority Applicant's claim for domestic priority benefit of Provisional Application no 63/220335, filed 7/9/21, is acknowledged. Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, or 365(c) is acknowledged. This application discloses and claims only subject matter disclosed in prior application no 17/683766, filed 3/1/22, prior application no 18/197263, filed 5/15/23, and names the inventor or at least one joint inventor named in the prior application. Accordingly, this application constitutes a continuation. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory obviousness-type double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); and In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on a nonstatutory double patenting ground provided the conflicting application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with this application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. Effective January 1, 1994, a registered attorney or agent of record may sign a terminal disclaimer. A terminal disclaimer signed by the assignee must fully comply with 37 CFR 3.73(b). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11688246 and 12205440. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because they share the same scope. See below for a comparison example. Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 11688246 U.S. Patent No. 12205440 1. A system comprising: at least one non-transitory storage medium storing instructions; and at least one processor that executes the instructions to: configure symbol reels using symbols from a symbol table according to a selected denomination and a random number generator such that at least a first symbol is used for a first selected denomination and at least a second symbol different from the first symbol is used for a second denomination; instruct a display to display an outcome that includes at least some of the symbols; determine that the at least some of the symbols include multiple adjacent numbers; and instruct the display to animate merging of the multiple adjacent numbers. 1. A system comprising: at least one user interface mechanism that receives: an indication of a number of symbol reels, the symbol reels including nonvalue symbols; and an indication of a denomination set; at least one non-transitory storage medium storing instructions; and at least one processor that executes the instructions to: configure the symbol reels using value symbols from a value symbol table according to the indication of the denomination set; determine an outcome of the number of the symbol reels; and determine a game outcome by concatenating a number of the value symbols present in the outcome of the number of the symbol reels along a payline indicated by a trigger symbol present on a trigger reel. 1. A system comprising: at least one non-transitory storage medium storing instructions; and at least one processor that executes the instructions to: configure symbol reels using value symbols from a value symbol table according to a selected denomination set and a random number generator such that at least a first value symbol is used for a first selected denomination set and at least a second value symbol different from the first value symbol is used for a second denomination set; and display a game outcome on a display generated by concatenating a number of the value symbols present in an outcome of the symbol reels, 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor further executes the instructions to determine a payline indicated by a trigger symbol present on a trigger reel. 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the at least one processor concatenates the number of the value symbols on the payline. 10. A method, comprising: configuring symbol reels using symbols from a symbol table according to a selected bet level and a random number generator such that at least a first symbol is used for a first selected bet level and at least a second symbol different from the first symbol is used for a second bet level; instructing a display to display an outcome that includes at least some of the symbols; detecting a triggering event; and in response to detecting the triggering event, instructing the display to animate merging of the at least some of the symbols wherein the at least some of the symbols include multiple adjacent numbers. 11. A system comprising: symbol reels operable to iterate through a sequence of possible symbol reel outcomes and stop at a final symbol reel outcome, the symbol reels including nonvalue symbols; a trigger reel operable to iterate through a sequence of possible trigger reel outcomes and stop at a final trigger reel outcome; at least one user interface mechanism that receives: an indication of a number of the symbol reels; and an indication of a denomination set; and at least one processor that: configures the symbol reels with value symbols according to the indication of the denomination set; determines an outcome of the number of the symbol reels; and determines a game outcome by concatenating a number of the value symbols present in the outcome of the number of the symbol reels along a payline indicated by a trigger symbol present on a trigger reel. 15. A method, comprising: configuring symbol reels using value symbols from a value symbol table according to a selected denomination set and a random number generator such that at least a first value symbol is used for a first selected denomination set and at least a second value symbol different from the first value symbol is used for a second denomination set; and displaying a game outcome on a display generated by concatenating a number of the value symbols present in an outcome of the symbol reels. 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one processor further executes the instructions to determine a payline indicated by a trigger symbol present on a trigger reel. 7. The system of claim 6, wherein the at least one processor concatenates the number of the value symbols on the payline. 17. A computer program product stored in a non-transitory storage medium, comprising: first instructions, executable by at least one processor to configure symbol reels using symbols from a symbol table according to a selected denomination and a random number generator; second instructions, executable by the at least one processor to instruct a display to display an outcome that includes at least some of the symbols; third instructions, executable by the at least one processor to instruct a display to determine that the at least some of the symbols include multiple adjacent numbers; and fourth instructions, executable by the at least one processor to instruct the display to animate merging of the multiple adjacent numbers. 16. A system comprising: at least one non-transitory storage medium storing instructions; and at least one processor that executes the instructions to: receive an indication of a number of symbol reels, the symbol reels including nonvalue symbols; receive an indication of a denomination set; when the indication of the denomination set indicates a first denomination set, configure the symbol reels with first value symbols that include a first respin value; when the indication of the denomination set indicates a second denomination set, configure the symbol reels with second value symbols that include a second respin value; determine a first outcome of the number of the symbol reels; determine a first game outcome by concatenating a first number of the first value symbols or the second value symbols present in the first outcome of the number of the symbol reels along a first payline indicated by a first trigger symbol present on a trigger reel; determine to respin at least when the first game outcome includes the first respin value or the second respin value; and upon determining to respin: determine a second outcome of the number of the symbol reels; and determine a second game outcome by concatenating a second number of the first value symbols or the second value symbols present in the second outcome of the number of the symbol reels along a second payline indicated by a second trigger symbol present on the trigger reel. 18. A computer program product stored in a non-transitory storage medium, comprising: first instructions, executable by at least one processor to configure symbol reels using value symbols from a value symbol table according to a selected denomination set and a random number generator such that at least a first value symbol is used for a first selected denomination set and at least a second value symbol different from the first value symbol is used for a second denomination set; and second instructions, executable by the at least one processor to cause a game outcome to be displayed on a display, wherein the game outcome is generated by concatenating a number of the value symbols present in an outcome of the symbol reels. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON TAHAI YEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1777. The examiner can normally be reached on Mon - Fri 7am- 3pm PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dmitry Suhol can be reached on 571-272-4430. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JASON T YEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702936
INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC TOY SYSTEM
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697549
CONTENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM AND METHOD
2y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697545
NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12697546
NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND GAMING DEVICE
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12691376
MODALITY-EXPANDING GAMING EXPERIENCE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.6%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1107 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month