Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/975,006

Interconnections for Tunable Lens Systems

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Dec 10, 2024
Priority
Jan 26, 2024 — provisional 63/625,760
Examiner
VU, PHU
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
863 granted / 1012 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1035
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1012 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 2020/0409195 in view of Yamaguchi US 2014/0028924. Regarding claim 1, Cain teaches teaches an adjustable lens, comprising: first and second stacked liquid crystal cells (see fig. 1) wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first liquid crystal material (nematic LC material 6) and first electrodes (electrical circuitry 4, 8 concentric conductors 14a-14f see fig. 12) that adjust a phase profile of the first liquid crystal material and wherein the second liquid crystal cell comprises second liquid crystal material (nematic LC material 6) and second electrodes (electrical circuitry 4, 8 concentric conductors 14a-14f see fig. 12) that adjust a phase profile of the second liquid crystal material; a conductive material (conductive links 10a, 10b) interposed between the first liquid crystal cell and the second liquid crystal cell, wherein the conductive material conveys electrical signals between the first liquid crystal cell and the second liquid crystal cell. Cain teaches does not teach a printed circuit coupled to the first liquid crystal cell but does teach driver circuitry (fig. 14-15 driver chip 104) connected to the first cell. Yamaguchi teaches a printed circuit coupled (fig. 20 FPC 310) to first liquid crystal cell to provide power to the cells. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain in view of Yamaguchi to provide power to the liquid crystal cells. Regarding claim 2, Cain in in view of Yamaguchi teach the adjustable lens defined in claim 1 but does not explicitly teach the conductive material is selected from the group consisting of: conductive epoxy, anisotropic adhesive, metal, and solder. However conductive via (holes [0045]-[0046]) are commonly filed with silver epoxy and examiner takes official notice of this for forming electrical connection through vias. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain to form electrical connection through vias. Regarding claim 3, Cain in view of Yamaguchi teach the adjustable lens defined in claim 1 Cain further teaches wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first (fig 5 plastic support film 2a) and second substrates (plastic support film 2b) and the second liquid crystal cell comprises third (plastic support film 2a)and fourth substrates (plastic support film 2b). Regarding claim 4, Cain in view of Yamaguchi teach the adjustable lens defined in claim 3, Cain in view of Yamaguchi teach wherein the printed circuit is coupled to the first substrate (see claim 1 rejection above), Cain further teaches wherein the second substrate comprises first through-substrate-vias (filled with conductvia links 10a, 10b), and wherein the third substrate comprises second through-substrate-vias (filled with conductive links 10a, 10b). Claim(s) 5-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 2020/0409195 in view of Yamaguchi US 2014/0028924 and further in view of Lee US 2011/0194062. Regarding claim 5, Cain in view of Yamaguchi teach the adjustable lens defined in claim 4, Cain does not explicitly teach wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first sealant around the first liquid crystal material and the second liquid crystal cell comprises second sealant around the second liquid crystal material, wherein the first sealant comprises first conductive beads electrically coupled to the first through-substrate-vias, and wherein the second sealant comprises second conductive beads electrically coupled to the second through-substrate-vias. Lee teaches a sealant (fig. 2 seal 180) with conductive bead (conductive ball 180) for forming a seal around the liquid crystal while providing a conductive path between the substrates. Since Cain already discloses a conductive link (12a, 12b) providing a conductive path between the substrates at this position it would have been obvious to substitute the seal and conductive bead of Lee in place of the conductive link of Cain. This would meet the limitation of the first liquid crystal cell comprises first sealant around the first liquid crystal material and the second liquid crystal cell comprises second sealant around the second liquid crystal material, wherein the first sealant comprises first conductive beads electrically coupled to the first through-substrate-vias, and wherein the second sealant comprises second conductive beads electrically coupled to the second through-substrate-vias when substituted for the corresponding conductive links 12a and 12b of Cain. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain in view of Lee to form a seal that also provides a conductive path between the substrates. Regarding 6, Cain further teaches wherein the conductive material is electrically coupled between the first through-substrate-vias (filled with conductive links 10a and 10b) and the second through-substrate-vias (filled with conductive links 10a and 10b). Regarding claim 7, Cain further teaches the first conductive beads can be electrically insulated from one another and the second conductive beads are electrically insulated from one another to form independent intra-cell connections in each of the first and second liquid crystal cells (see fig 14). Regarding claim 8, Cain does not explicitly teach the conductive material comprises anisotropic conductive adhesive with groups of conductive particles that are electrically insulated from one another to form independent inter-cell connections between the first and second liquid crystal cells. However conductive adhesive conductive adhesive with groups of conductive particles are commonly used to form electrical connections in vias (see fig. 1 10a 10b) and examiner takes official notice of this. The concept of electrically insulated from one another to form independent inter-cell connections between the first and second liquid crystal cells is also taught by Cain (see fig. 14). Regarding claim 9, Cain further teaches the conductive material comprises via-to-via bonds that are electrically insulated from one another to form independent inter-cell connections between the first and second liquid crystal cells (see fig. 1 and 14). Claim(s) 10-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 2020/0409195 in view of Yamaguchi US 2014/0028924 and further in view of Gill US 11086143 Regarding claim 10, Cain in view of Yamaguchi teaches the adjustable lens defined in claim 1, Cain does not explicitly teach teaches a third liquid crystal cell interposed between the first and second liquid crystal cells, wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first and second substrates, wherein the third liquid crystal cell comprises a third substrate and third liquid crystal material, wherein the first liquid crystal material is sandwiched between the first and second substrates, and wherein the third liquid crystal material is sandwiched between the second and third substrates. However Gill teaches a third liquid crystal cell (fig. 8 40 center) wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first and second substrates (each cell 40 has substrates 32 and 30 see fig. 2), wherein the third liquid crystal cell comprises a third substrate and third liquid crystal material (each cell 40 has substrates 32 and 30 see fig. 2), wherein the first liquid crystal material (each cell has liquid crystal layer 34) is sandwiched between the first and second substrates, and wherein the third liquid crystal (liquid crystal layer 34) material is sandwiched between the second and third substrates for providing more complex phase profiles. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain and Yamaguchi in view of Gill to provide more complex phase profiles. Regarding claim 11, Gill further teaches some of the first electrodes are located on a first surface of the second substrate and wherein the third liquid crystal cell comprises third electrodes on an opposing second surface of the second substrate (see fig. 2 and 3). Regarding claim 12, Cain in Yamaguchi and further in view of Gill would teach second substrate has first through-substrate-vias, the third substrate has second through-substrate-vias, and the conductive material forms respective via-to-via connections between the first through-substrate-vias and the second through-substrate-vias as Cain provides a basis for routing through multiple substrates (see fig. 14). Claim(s) 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 2020/0409195 in view of Yamaguchi US 2014/0028924 in view of Gill US 11086143 and further in view of Lee US 2011/0194062. Regarding claim 13, Cain, Yamaguchi and Gill teach the adjustable lens defined in claim 11. Cain further teaches in the second substrate has first through-substrate-vias. Cain does not teach the third substrate has second through-substrate-vias, and the third liquid crystal material is surrounded by a sealant, and wherein the conductive material comprises conductive beads in the sealant that form respective via-to-via connections between the first through-substrate-vias and the second through-substrate-vias. Lee teaches a sealant (fig. 2 seal 180) with conductive bead (conductive ball 180) for forming a seal around the liquid crystal while providing a conductive path between the substrates. Since Cain already discloses a conductive link (12a, 12b) providing a conductive path between the substrates at this position it would have been obvious to substitute the seal and conductive bead of Lee in place of the conductive link of Cain. This would render obvious the third substrate has second through-substrate-vias, and the third liquid crystal material is surrounded by a sealant, and wherein the conductive material comprises conductive beads in the sealant that form respective via-to-via connections between the first through-substrate-vias and the second through-substrate-vias. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain in view of Lee to form a seal that also provides a conductive path between the substrates. Regarding claim 14, Cain teaches an adjustable lens, comprising: first and second substrates (fig. 5 plastic support film 2a 2b); liquid crystal material (liquid crystal material 6) sandwiched between the first and second substrates; first and second arrays of electrodes (concentric conductors 14a-14f) configured to adjust a phase profile of the liquid crystal material; and sealant that surrounds the liquid crystal material. Cain also teaches multiple independent signal paths through which signals are conveyed between the first and second substrates (see fig. 14) and a conductive link 12a and 12b in a layer where the seal would appear. Cain does not teach wherein the sealant comprises conductive beads that are electrically insulated from one another to for multiple independent signal paths through which signals are conveyed between the first and second substrates. However Lee teaches forming a seal (fig. 2 180) with conductive bead (conductive ball 185) for sealing a q liquid crystal layer while providing a conductive link between first and second substrate. Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain in view of Lee to form a seal that also provides a multiple isolated conductive path between the substrates. Regarding claim 15, Cain teaches further teaches the adjustable lens defined in claim 14 further comprising through-substrate-vias (fig. 5 conductive links 10a and 10b) in the second substrate ((plastic support film 2b) that are electrically coupled to the conductive beads. Regarding claim 16, Cain further teaches third and fourth substrates (fig. 5 plastic support films 2a 2b bottom) stacked with the first and second substrates; additional liquid crystal material (liquid crystal 6 bottom) sandwiched between the third and fourth substrates; third and fourth arrays (concentric electrodes 14a-14f) of electrodes configured to adjust a phase profile of the additional liquid crystal material; a conductive material (conductive links 10a, 10b) interposed between the second and third substrates; and additional through-substrate-vias in the third substrate that are electrically coupled to the through-substrate-vias through the conductive material. Claim(s) 17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 20200409195. Regarding claim 17, Cain teaches a stack of liquid crystal cells including first and second liquid crystal cells (see fig. 5); a printed circuit (driver chip 104 see fig. 14) coupled to the first liquid crystal cell; and interconnections (fig. 14 conductive connections 108 or conductive links 10a, 10b) that pass vertically through the stack of liquid crystal cells and that form multiple independent signal paths (see fig. 14) between the printed circuit, the first liquid crystal cell, and the second liquid crystal cell. Cain does not explicitly teach eyeglasses, comprising: a supporting frame; and left and right adjustable lenses mounted to the supporting frame, wherein each of the left and right adjustable lenses. However Cain does teach these are suited to compensate for astigmatism in the human eye [0056]. Therefore eyeglasses, comprising: a supporting frame; and left and right adjustable lenses mounted to the supporting frame, wherein each of the left and right adjustable lenses would be obvious as astigmatism correction would commonly be corrected through glasses. Claim(s) 18-20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cain US 2020/0409195 in in view of Lee US 2011/0194062. Regarding claim 18, Cain does not explicitly teach wherein the interconnections comprise conductive beads in a liquid crystal sealant, through-glass-vias, and a conductive material interposed between the first and second liquid crystal cells. Conductive beads in a liquid crystal sealant, through- vias, and a conductive material interposed between the first and second liquid crystal cells to provide a sealing function that provides a conductive path between the substrates (see fig. 2). Therefore, it would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Cain in view of Lee to form a seal that also provides a multiple isolated conductive path between the substrates. The limitation of through glass vias is not explicitly taught as Cain teaches plastic material. However glass is a common substitute as it offers better heat resistance than plastic and can easily be substituted here. Regarding claim 19, Cain further teaches each of the first and second liquid crystal cells comprises: first and second substrates (see fig. 5); liquid crystal material sandwiched(6) between the first and second substrates; and first and second arrays of electrodes (14 and 14b) respectively located on the first and second substrates and configured to adjust a phase profile of the liquid crystal material. Regarding claim 20, Cain further teaches wherein the first liquid crystal cell comprises first liquid crystal material (6) sandwiched between first and second substrates (2a and 2b fig. 6), wherein the second liquid crystal cell comprises second liquid crystal material (6) sandwiched between the second substrate and a third substrate (2b and 2b), wherein a electrodes ( 8 and 14a-14f) is located on a first surface of the second substrate and is configured to adjust a phase profile of the first liquid crystal material, and wherein a second array electrodes (4 and 14a-14f) is located on a second surface of the second substrate and is configured to adjust a phase profile of the second liquid crystal material. Cain also does not teach finger electrodes however the shape of the electrodes determines the phase profile adjustment therefore it would have been obvious to modify the shape of the electrodes according to desired phase profile. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHU VU whose telephone number is (571)272-1562. The examiner can normally be reached 11:00 - 7:00 M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Carruth can be reached at 571-272-9791. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHU VU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 10, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12704659
METASURFACE, METALENS, AND METALENS ARRAY WITH CONTROLLABLE ANGULAR FIELD-OF-VIEW
3y 0m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12697872
SMART SURFACE, CENTER CONSOLE FOR VEHICLE, AND VEHICLE
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693542
ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693502
IMAGE CAPTURING SYSTEM LENS ASSEMBLY, IMAGING APPARATUS AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687732
Multi-Channel Optical Module
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.6%)
2y 2m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1012 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month