Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026
Application No. 18/979,317

A METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME THREE-DIMENSIONAL SCENE GRAPH CREATION

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 12, 2024
Examiner
YENTRAPATI, AVINASH
Art Unit
2672
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 2m
Est. Remaining
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
522 granted / 697 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Minimal -4% lift
Without
With
+-4.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
709
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
§103
54.8%
+14.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.0%
-18.0% vs TC avg
§112
11.3%
-28.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 697 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by D1.1 With regard to claim 1, D1 teach receiving, as input to a transformer model, sensor data corresponding to a two- dimensional (2D) image of a current scene of a vehicle (see abstract, § IIIB ¶ 1, fig. 2: input image to transformer model); encoding, using a birds-eye view encoder, the sensor data to generate a corresponding sequence of feature embeddings, the sequence of feature embeddings corresponding to a three- dimensional (3D) representation of the current scene of the vehicle (see fig. 2: BEV encoder to generate embeddings); decoding the sequence of feature embeddings using two or more feature-specific decoders executing in parallel (see fig. 2: HD map decoder and lane network decoder in parallel, see also abstract); processing, using a prediction network, the decoded sequence of feature embeddings to convert the decoded sequence feature of embeddings into semantic features (see fig. 2: decoded feature embeddings; see p. 2172 col 2 ¶ 2: semantic categories); and processing, using a topology network, the semantic features and the decoded sequence of feature embeddings to generate an adjacency matrix representing a 3D view of the current scene of the vehicle (see fig. 2, p. 2172 col 2 ¶ 2: adjacency matrix). With regard to claim 2, D1 teach method of Claim 1, wherein the two or more feature-specific decoders executing in parallel each include a plurality of transformer layers (see abstract, fig. 2: HD map decoder and lane network decoder in parallel). With regard to claim 3, D1 teach method of Claim 2, wherein each transformer layer includes a cross-attention head (see fig. 2: cross attention head). With regard to claim 4, D1 teach method of Claim 2, wherein decoding the sequence of feature embeddings using the two or more feature-specific decoders executing in parallel comprises executing cross- attention of the sequence of feature embeddings between corresponding transformer layers of the two or more feature-specific decoders (see fig. 2, abstract: two decoders in parallel with corresponding cross attention heads). With regard to claim 5, D1 teach method of Claim 1, wherein the sensor data includes a set of image frames (see fig. 2: input plurality of frames). With regard to claim 6, D1 teach method of Claim 5, wherein operations further comprise, for each image frame of the set of image frames, extracting feature embeddings of the current scene (see fig. 2: e4xtracting feature embeddings). With regard to claim 7, D1 teach method of Claim 6, wherein encoding, using the birds-eye view encoder, the sensor data to generate the corresponding sequence of feature embeddings comprises projecting the sensor data into the corresponding sequence of feature embeddings (see fig. 2: birds eye vide encoder). With regard to claim 8, D1 teach method of Claim 1, wherein the prediction network comprises a multilayer perceptron network (see fig. 2, § III ¶ 2: MLP). With regard to claim 9, D1 teach method of Claim 1, wherein the 2D image of the current scene of the vehicle comprises at least two elements (see fig. 2, § III ¶ 2: image comprises plurality of elements or features). With regard to claim 10, D1 teach method of Claim 9, wherein the adjacency matrix predicts a strength of the relationship between the at least two elements (see fig. 2, p. 2171 col 2: adjacency matrix). With regard to claims 11-19, see analysis of corresponding claims above. With regard to claim 20, see discussion of claim 1. D1 further teach wherein the 2D image includes at least two elements (see fig. 2, § III ¶ 2: image comprises plurality of elements or features). Pertinent Art Kum et al.2 is related to a method and system for graph-based bird's-eye-view (BEV) driving environment perception for autonomous driving. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AVINASH YENTRAPATI whose telephone number is (571)270-7982. The examiner can normally be reached on 8AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sumati Lefkowitz can be reached on (571) 272-3638. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AVINASH YENTRAPATI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2672 1 Zhu, Tianyi, et al. "Lanemapnet: Lane network recognization and hd map construction using curve region aware temporal bird’s-eye-view perception." 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE, 2024. 2 US Publication No. 2025/0139986.
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 12, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Aug 12, 2026
Interview Requested
Aug 28, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 29, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748053
INSPECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF INSPECTING INSPECTION TARGET USING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737838
Lightweight Dense Residual Network for Video Super-Resolution on Mobile Devices
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737913
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
2y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738444
HYBRID BACKGROUND EXTRACTION IN ELECTRON HOLOGRAPHY
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12738157
Method and System for the Camera-Based Determining of the Speed of a Vehicle in Traffic
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (-4.3%)
2y 11m (~1y 2m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 697 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month