Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/980,912

TRAIN CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM BASED ON COMBINED COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND CONTROLLER

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 13, 2024
Examiner
TRAN, LONG T
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
BYD Company Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 2m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
1114 granted / 1343 resolved
+12.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1371
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.0%
-3.0% vs TC avg
§102
44.6%
+4.6% vs TC avg
§112
15.8%
-24.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1343 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1 – 20 remain pending in the application and have been fully considered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 – 7, 16 – 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhang et al. (CN 109383565). Regarding Claim 1: Zhang et al. teaches a train control method, based on a combined coordinate system, comprising: obtaining a target combined coordinate system corresponding to a planned train path, the target combined coordinate system comprising a plurality of basic coordinate systems with boundary logic sections, and each of the basic coordinate systems forming a physical link relationship with another basic coordinate system of the basic coordinate systems through the boundary logic sections (Figs 1 – 3, via A-B-G-H-D-E-F); obtaining position information of a train located in the planned train path sent by the train, and determining preceding train information of a preceding train preceding to the train based on the position information and the physical link relationships between the basic coordinate systems (via sub coordinates, ABCGH to R0, R1, R6, R7, R8); and performing a train control strategy on the train based on the preceding train information (Figs 1 – 7, via switch change). Regarding Claim 2: Zhang et al. teaches each of the basic coordinate systems comprises an upward coordinate system and a downward coordinate system; and before the obtaining a target combined coordinate system corresponding to a planned train path, the method further comprises: obtaining logic sections in the planned train path, the logic sections comprising the boundary logic sections and ordinary logic sections, wherein the boundary logic sections comprise a bulb line logic section, a turnout logic section, and a terminal logic section, and the ordinary logic sections comprise logic sections other than the boundary logic sections; determining the upward coordinate system based on upward link relationships of the planned train path, the boundary logic sections, and the ordinary logic sections, and determining the downward coordinate system based on downward link relationships of the planned train path, the boundary logic sections, and the ordinary logic sections; generating an upward combined coordinate system based on the upward coordinate systems, and generating a downward combined coordinate system based on the downward coordinate systems; and generating the target combined coordinate system based on the upward combined coordinate systems and the downward combined coordinate systems (Figs 1 – 3). Regarding Claim 3: Zhang et al. teaches the determining the upward coordinate system based on upward link relationships of the planned train path, the boundary logic sections, and the ordinary logic sections comprises: determining the upward coordinate system based on upward coordinate system generation requirements, wherein the upward coordinate system generation requirements comprise: logic sections in the upward coordinate system are connected in sequence based on the upward link relationships; the upward coordinate system comprises at least one of the boundary logic sections; each of the ordinary logic sections in the upward coordinate system is located between two of the boundary logic sections; and an upward link relationship of each of the ordinary logic sections in the upward coordinate system is unique (Figs 1 – 3). Regarding Claim 4: Zhang et al. teaches the determining the downward coordinate system based on downward link relationships of the planned train path, the boundary logic sections, and the ordinary logic sections comprises: determining the downward coordinate system based on downward coordinate system generation requirements, wherein the downward coordinate system generation requirements comprise: logic sections in the downward coordinate system are connected in sequence based on the downward link relationships; the downward coordinate system comprises at least one of the boundary logic sections; each of the ordinary logic sections in the downward coordinate system is located between two of the boundary logic sections; and a downward link relationship of each of the ordinary logic sections in the downward coordinate system is unique (Figs 1 – 7). Regarding Claim 5: Zhang et al. teaches the boundary logic sections comprise an initial boundary logic section and a terminal boundary logic section, and the physical link relationships comprise an upward physical link relationship; and the generating an upward combined coordinate system based on the upward coordinate systems comprises: obtaining an upward initial link coordinate system and an upward terminal link coordinate system of the upward coordinate system based on the upward link relationships of the planned train path, wherein the upward initial link coordinate system refers to a previous basic coordinate system of the initial boundary logic section of the upward coordinate system in an upward direction; and the upward terminal link coordinate system refers to a next basic coordinate system of the terminal boundary logic section of the upward coordinate system in the upward direction; and recording the upward initial link coordinate system and the upward terminal link coordinate system as the upward physical link relationship corresponding to the upward coordinate system corresponding to the upward initial link coordinate system and the upward terminal link coordinate system, and generating the upward combined coordinate system based on the upward coordinate systems and the upward physical link relationships corresponding to the upward coordinate systems (Figs 1 – 7). Regarding Claim 6: Zhang et al. teaches wherein the boundary logic sections comprise an initial boundary logic section and a terminal boundary logic section; the physical link relationships comprise a downward physical link relationship; and the generating a downward combined coordinate system based on the downward coordinate systems comprises: obtaining a downward initial link coordinate system and a downward terminal link coordinate system of the downward coordinate system based on the downward link relationships of the planned train path, wherein the downward initial link coordinate system refers to a previous basic coordinate system of the initial boundary logic section of the downward coordinate system in a downward direction; and the downward terminal link coordinate system refers to a next basic coordinate system of the terminal boundary logic section of the downward coordinate system in the downward direction; and recording the downward initial link coordinate system and the downward terminal link coordinate system as the downward physical link relationship corresponding to the downward coordinate system corresponding to the downward initial link coordinate system and the downward terminal link coordinate system, and generating the downward combined coordinate system based on the downward coordinate systems and the downward physical link relationships corresponding to the downward coordinate systems (Figs 1 – 7). Regarding Claim 7: Zhang et al. teaches the obtaining position information of a train located in the planned train path sent by the train comprises: obtaining position information of each of trains located in the planned train path sent by each of the trains through a vehicle on-board controller (VOBC), the position information of each of the trains comprising: a first logic section where a maximum safe front end of each of the trains is located in the planned train path, and a first offset of the maximum safe front end in the first logic section; and a traveling direction of the train, the traveling direction comprising an upward direction or a downward direction (Fig 1 – 7). Regarding Claim 16: Zhang et al. teaches the performing a train control strategy on the train based on the preceding train information comprises: adjusting a traveling route and/or a traveling speed of the train based on the preceding train information (Fig 1 – 3, via route switch). Regarding Claim 17: See rejection of Claim 1 above. Regarding Claim 18: See rejection of Claim 2 above. Regarding Claim 19: See rejection of Claim 3 above Regarding Claim 20: See rejection of Claim 1 above. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8 – 15 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LONG T TRAN whose telephone number is (571)270-1899. The examiner can normally be reached Mon - Fri 9:00 - 5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at 571-270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LONG T TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 13, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601315
CARBURETED ENGINE HAVING AN ADJUSTABLE FUEL TO AIR RATIO
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600407
STEERING CONTROL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600405
VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL PROGRAM, AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594989
COMPENSATION SYSTEM FOR COMPENSATING TRAILER SWAY OF A VEHICLE TRAILER OF A TOWING VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594936
VEHICLE CONTROL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.8%)
2y 2m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1343 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month