Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 18/985,742

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DRIVING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Priority
Feb 26, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0027114
Examiner
CERULLO, LILIANA P
Art Unit
2621
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 75% — above average
75%
Career Allowance Rate
716 granted / 959 resolved
+12.7% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+20.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
990
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
56.3%
+16.3% vs TC avg
§102
19.9%
-20.1% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 959 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This Final action is in response to an amendment filed 5/19/2026. Currently claims 1-20 are pending, but claims 6-7, 12-13 and 19-20 are withdrawn from examination as directed to non-elected subject matter and claims 1-5, 8-11 and 14-18 are examined as follows. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-2, 8-10 and 14-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bae et al. in US 2021/0055848 (hereinafter Bae) in view of Nohno et al in US 6,239,788 (hereinafter Nohno). Regarding claim 1, Bae disclose a display device (Bae’s Fig. 1: see 160) comprising: a display panel (Bae’s Fig. 3 and par. 72) comprising touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74-75: x-axis line sensors that are charged [driven]); and a touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) comprising a driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75: x-axis transmitters) configured to output driving signals (Bae’s par. 75: charging the plurality of x-axis line sensors) supplied to the touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74: x-axis line sensors), and a touch control unit (Bae’s par. 73: touch AFE, ADC, DSP or MCU) configured to control the driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75), wherein the touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) is configured to: output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal (Bae’s Fig. 5 and par. 88-89: drive the touch AFE upon receiving vertical synchronization signal); receive a detection signal associated with a touch input on the display panel (Bae’s par. 89: sense plurality of sensors to detect touch input). Bae fails to disclose the touch driver circuit is configured to: sequentially output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal; or calculate an elapsed time from a first time when the vertical synchronization signal is output until a second time when the detection signal is received; and determine touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time. However, in the same field of endeavor of touch detection in touch panels based on clock signals, Nohno discloses sequentially outputting driving signals (Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 26-30: sequentially making a source electrode for scan) in response to a clock signal that sets a touch period and a display period (Nohno’s Fig. 6 and col. 17 line 41-44); receiving a detection signal (Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 46-64: x-coordinate or y-coordinate detection voltage) associated with a touch input (Nohno’s col. 13 line 65 to col. 14 line 10: peak detection of the detection voltage); calculating an elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: count value of number of clocks from the start of the scanning of the source electrode to the peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage, see also col. 25 lines 17-26) from a start of the coordinate detection (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6, col. 25 lines 17-26: start of coordinate detection) until a second time when the detection signal is received (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage); and determining touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 line 6: x-coordinate value [from count value]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, that Bae’s outputting of the driving signals is sequential, and that the touch input coordinate information is determined based on the elapsed time from the start of the scan [Vsync] to when the detection signal is received (as disclosed by Nohno), in order to obtain the predictable result of sequential operation (Bae’s par. 51) and the predictable result of the touch input coordinate information based on the time when a synchronization signal is received (Bae’s par. 111). By doing such combination, Bae in view of Nohno disclose: A display device (Bae’s Fig. 1: see 160) comprising: a display panel (Bae’s Fig. 3 and par. 72) comprising touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74-75: x-axis line sensors that are charged [driven]); and a touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) comprising a driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75: x-axis transmitters) configured to output driving signals (Bae’s par. 75: charging the plurality of x-axis line sensors) supplied to the touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74: x-axis line sensors), and a touch control unit (Bae’s par. 73: touch AFE, ADC, DSP or MCU) configured to control the driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75). wherein the touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) is configured to: sequentially output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal (Bae’s Fig. 5 and par. 88-89: drive the touch AFE upon receiving vertical synchronization signal, which upon combination is sequential per Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 26-30: sequentially making a source electrode for scan); receive a detection signal associated with a touch input on the display panel (Bae’s par. 89: sense plurality of sensors to detect touch input, which upon combination is detecting a peak of an x or y coordinate detection voltage per Nohno’s col. 13 line 46 to col. 14 line 10); calculate an elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: count value of number of clocks from the start of the scanning of the source electrode to the peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage) from a first time when the vertical synchronization signal is output (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6, col. 25 lines 17-26: start of coordinate detection which upon combination is the vertical synchronization signal of Bae’s Fig. 5 and par. 88-89) until a second time when the detection signal is received (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage); and determine touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 line 5: x-coordinate value [from count value] which is equivalent to detecting input from synchronization signal in Bae’s par. 111). Regarding claim 8, Bae disclose an electronic device (Bae’s par. 1) comprising: a host (Bae’s Figs. 1, 3 and par. 42, 50: see server 108 or processor); a display panel (Bae’s Fig. 3 and par. 72) comprising touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74-75: x-axis line sensors that are charged [driven]); and a touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) comprising a driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75: x-axis transmitters) configured to output driving signals (Bae’s par. 75: charging the plurality of x-axis line sensors) supplied to the touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74: x-axis line sensors), and a touch control unit (Bae’s par. 73: touch AFE, ADC, DSP or MCU) configured to control the driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75), wherein the touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) is configured to: output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal of the display panel (Bae’s Figs. 5, 7 and par. 87-89: drive the touch AFE upon receiving vertical synchronization signal TSP_Vsync which is synchronized with Vsync, TSP_Vsync is supplied at the start of the frame [when Vsync is supplied]) indicating a frame period for display of an image (Bae’s par. 84 Vsync for display of content in a frame, par. 68: TSP_Vysnc is a multiple of the frame rate [based on Vsync]); receive a detection signal associated with a touch input on the display panel (Bae’s par. 89: sense plurality of sensors to detect touch input). Bae fails to disclose the touch driver circuit is configured to: sequentially output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal; or transmit an elapsed time until a second time when the detection signal is received measured from a first time when the vertical synchronization signal is output by the host of the display device; and wherein the host determines touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time received from the touch driver circuit. However, in the same field of endeavor of touch detection in touch panels based on clock signals, Nohno discloses sequentially outputting driving signals (Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 26-30: sequentially making a source electrode for scan) in response to a clock signal that sets a touch period and a display period (Nohno’s Fig. 6 and col. 17 line 41-44); receiving a detection signal (Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 46-64: x-coordinate or y-coordinate detection voltage) associated with a touch input (Nohno’s col. 13 line 65 to col. 14 line 10: peak detection of the detection voltage); transmitting an elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: count value of number of clocks from the start of the scanning of the source electrode to the peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage, see also col. 25 lines 17-26) until a second time when the detection signal is received (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage) from a start of the coordinate detection (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6, col. 25 lines 17-26: start of coordinate detection); and determining touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 line 6: x-coordinate value [from count value]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, that Bae’s outputting of the driving signals is sequential, and that the touch input coordinate information is determined based on the elapsed time from the start of the scan [Vsync] to when the detection signal is received (as disclosed by Nohno), in order to obtain the predictable result of sequential operation (Bae’s par. 51) and the predictable result of the touch input coordinate information based on the time when a synchronization signal is received (Bae’s par. 111). By doing such combination, Bae in view of Nohno disclose: An electronic device (Bae’s par. 1) comprising: a host (Bae’s Figs. 1, 3 and par. 42, 50, 55: see server 108 or processor) a display panel (Bae’s Fig. 3 and par. 72) comprising touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74-75: x-axis line sensors that are charged [driven]); and a touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) comprising a driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75: x-axis transmitters) configured to output driving signals (Bae’s par. 75: charging the plurality of x-axis line sensors) supplied to the touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74: x-axis line sensors), and a touch control unit (Bae’s par. 73: touch AFE, ADC, DSP or MCU) configured to control the driving signal output unit (Bae’s par. 75). wherein the touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) is configured to: sequentially output the driving signals in response to a vertical synchronization signal of the display panel (Bae’s Fig. 5 and par. 88-89: drive the touch AFE upon receiving TSP_Vsync which is synchronized with Vsync; upon combination the driving is sequential per Nohno’s Fig. 1 and col. 13 lines 26-30: sequentially making a source electrode for scan) indicating a frame period for display of an image (Bae’s par. 84 Vsync for display of content in a frame); receive a detection signal associated with a touch input on the display panel (Bae’s par. 89: sense plurality of sensors to detect touch input, which upon combination is detecting a peak of an x or y coordinate detection voltage per Nohno’s col. 13 line 46 to col. 14 line 10); transmit an elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: count value of number of clocks from the start of the scanning of the source electrode to the peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage, where the count value of number of clocks from the start is a scanning time [elapsed time] per Nohno’s col. 25 lines 17-26) until a second time when the detection signal is received (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6: peak detection of the X-coordinate detection voltage) from a first time when the vertical synchronization signal is output (Nohno’s col. 14 lines 3-6, col. 25 lines 17-26: start of coordinate detection which upon combination is the vertical synchronization signal of Bae’s Fig. 5 and par. 88-89) by the host of the electronic device (Nohno’s Fig. 3 and par. 84: Vsync output by circuit 320, par. 42: all operations of device 101 executed by external device 108 [server]); and wherein the host (Bae’s par. 42: all operations of device 101 executed by external device 108 [server]) determines touch coordinates of the touch input based on the elapsed time (Nohno’s col. 14 line 5: x-coordinate value [from count value] which is equivalent to detecting input from synchronization signal in Bae’s par. 111). Regarding claim 14, Bae in view of Nohno disclose a method for driving a display device as described for claim 1. Regarding claims 2, 10 and 15, Bae in view of Nohno disclose wherein the display panel further comprises touch sensing electrodes (Bae’s par. 74, 76: y-axis line sensors, receivers) disposed intersecting with the touch driving electrodes (Bae’s par. 74: x vs. y), and wherein the touch driver circuit (Bae’s Fig. 3: see 340) receives the detection signal through the touch sensing electrodes (Bae’s par. 74-76, 88: receive at receivers when y-axis are receivers and x-axis are transmitters). Regarding claim 9, Bae in view of Nohno disclose wherein the host is a processor (Bae’s Figs. 1, 3: see server 108 or processor). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 3-5, 11 and 16-18 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claims 3, 11 and 16, the prior art fails to disclose ALL limitations of their respective independent claims in addition to “store a plurality of first output times until the driving signals are sequentially output measured from the first time; store a plurality of second output times until horizontal synchronization signals of the display panel are sequentially output measured from the first time; determine a first counting time corresponding to the elapsed time among the plurality of first output times, to determine an x coordinate of the touch coordinates based on the first counting time; and determine a second counting time corresponding to the elapsed time among the plurality of second output times, to determine a y coordinate of the touch coordinates based on the second counting time”. Dependent claims 4-5 and 17-18 are indicated as allowable for at least the same reason. The closest prior art to Bae and Nohno fail to disclose these features. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 5/19/2026 have been fully considered but they are not fully persuasive. On the Remarks pgs. 9-12, Applicant argues with respect to independent claims 1, 8 and 14 that Nohno’s counting of clock pulses until a peak detecting voltage is observed, is different from the claimed elapsed time measured from a first time the vertical synchronization signal is output. The office must respectfully disagree, Nohno clearly states that the coordinate is obtained on the basis of the scanning time from the start of the coordinate detection to the peak voltage (Nohno’s col. 25 lines 17-26), this is implemented by counting the clocks from the start of a detection period to the peak value (Nohno’s col. 13 line 65 to col. 14 line 10), the clock having a frequency that allows for detecting the elapsed time to the peak value (Nohno’s col. 24 line 7-26: see n x 5 µsec, where n is the number of clocks). With respect to the vertical synchronization signal, the office agrees that Nohno start of the detection period is not disclosed as a first time when the vertical synchronization signal is output. However, the claim is rejected over Bae in view of Nohno, and Bae does disclose the start of the detection period as a first time of Vsync output (Bae’s Fig. 5). Applicant arguments presented on the Remarks filed 5/19/2026 with respect to amended claims 3, 11 and 16 are persuasive. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Liliana Cerullo whose telephone number is (571)270-5882. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM to 3PM MT. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amr Awad can be reached at 571-272-7764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LILIANA CERULLO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2621
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 18, 2024
Application Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 19, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 26, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12699484
ELECTRONIC DEVICE, INTERFACE DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693761
SCANNING CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TOUCH DISPLAY SCREEN, DEVICE, AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM
1y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12688831
SHIFT REGISTER, GATE DRIVING CIRCUIT AND DISPLAY SUBSTRATE WITH CONDUCTIVE LINES BETWEEN OUTPUT TRANSISTOR AND CAPACITOR STRUCTURE
1y 6m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12675192
TOUCH DISPLAY DEVICE AND DISPLAY PANEL WITH PSEUDO-TOUCH ELECTRODE AND TOUCH LINES HAVING DIFFERENT WIDTHS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12669888
METHOD FOR MATCHING TOUCH POINTS, A METHOD FOR OBTAINING A TOUCH TRAJECTORY, AND PRODUCTS
1y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+20.9%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 959 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month