Prosecution Insights
Last updated: September 27, 2026
Application No. 18/987,999

Sub-Girts For Exterior Wall System Assemblies

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Priority
Dec 26, 2023 — provisional 63/614,690
Examiner
ADAMOS, THEODORE V
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Sto Corp.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
11m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
503 granted / 910 resolved
-4.7% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+44.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
955
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
43.1%
+3.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
27.5%
-12.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 910 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This is a non-final Office Action on the merits for U.S. App. 18/987,999. Receipt of the Response to the Election/Restriction filed on 07/22/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 1-54 are pending. Claims 3, 6, 9-11, 13-41, 43-48, and 50-54 are withdrawn. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 42, and 49 are examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species VII in the reply filed on 07/22/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). The Restriction is thus considered final. Claims 3, 6, 9-11, 13-41, 43-48, and 50-54 are thus withdrawn from consideration for defining a non-elected embodiment. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 2, 12, 42, and 49 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nelson et al. (U.S. Patent 11,299,891). Regarding 1, Nelson et al. disclose a sub-grit (#100(3)) for mounting a component of an exterior wall system assembly (see figures 9 and 10), the sub-girt comprising: an elongated sub-girt body (the U-shaped body as depicted in figure 8) comprising a stem flange (#122), a front flange (#106), and a chord (#102), and wherein the chord comprises a plurality of chord vent holes (#120). Regarding claim 2, Nelson et al. disclose the chord is aligned parallel to the stem flange (see figure 8). Regarding claim 12, Nelson et al. disclose the front flange is aligned perpendicular to the stem flange (see figure 8). Regarding 42, Nelson et al. disclose a sub-grit (#100(3)) for mounting a component of an exterior wall system assembly (see figures 9 and 10), the sub-girt comprising: an elongated sub-girt body (the U-shaped body as depicted in figure 8) comprising a stem flange (#122), a front flange (#106) depending from the stem flange (see figure 8), and wherein the front flange comprises a plurality of adhesive-receiving holes (#118(2)). Regarding 49, Nelson et al. disclose the elongated sub-girt body comprises steel (see col. 2, ll. 36-43). Claim(s) 1, 7, and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nelson (U.S. Publication 2021/0254347). Regarding 1, Nelson discloses a sub-grit (#100) for mounting a component of an exterior wall system assembly (see figure 6), the sub-girt comprising: an elongated sub-girt body (the body as depicted in figure 1A) comprising a stem flange (#110), a front flange (#104), and a chord (#114), and wherein the chord comprises a plurality of chord vent holes (#115). Regarding 7, Nelson discloses the stem flange comprises a plurality of stem flange vent holes (#126), and wherein the stem flange vent holes are in fluid communication with the chord vent holes (see figure 1A, where air or other fluids can travel from the chord holes #115, through the stem holes #126 and into the rectangular channel therebelow). Regarding 8, Nelson discloses each stem flange vent hole is aligned offset from each chord vent hole (see figure 1A). Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, and 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by KR ‘275 (KR 20150019274). Regarding 1, KR ‘275 discloses a sub-grit (#10) for mounting a component of an exterior wall system assembly (see figure 9b, where the sub-grit #10 is configured to be used in a vertical wall section and thus meets such configured to language as broadly defined or used in the floor of an exterior wall system assembly as broadly defined), the sub-girt comprising: an elongated sub-girt body (the body as depicted in figure 9a) comprising a stem flange (the left flange #12 of figure 9b), a front flange (#11), and a chord (the right flange #12 of figure 9b), and wherein the chord comprises a plurality of chord vent holes (#124). Regarding 2, KR ‘275 discloses the chord is aligned parallel to the stem flange (figure 6 depicts various embodiments of the sub-girt where the stem flange and chord can be oriented parallel with one another, away from one another or toward one another, where the left column, top-most embodiment of figure 6 is what is being used for such a rejection where the chord and stem flanges #12 are parallel with one another). Regarding 4, KR ‘275 discloses the elongated sub-girt body comprises a plurality of teeth (the teeth formed on either side of openings #121 as depicted in figure 9a). Regarding 5, KR ‘275 discloses the plurality of teeth are connected to the chord (see figure 9a). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THEODORE V ADAMOS whose telephone number is (571)270-1166. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Brian D Mattei can be reached at (571) 270-3238. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /THEODORE V ADAMOS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3635
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12716233
RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY CONSTRUCTION
3y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12709902
Panel and Covering
1y 1m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12686561
A Grid Levelling Mechanism
3y 5m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12687033
Parallelogram Articulated Lattice Mast for Passive (Self) Deployment
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680303
TRUSS SYSTEM
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.7%)
2y 9m (~11m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 910 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month