Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/988,669

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Dec 19, 2024
Examiner
AU, SCOTT D
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allow Rate
397 granted / 518 resolved
+14.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
536
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
66.0%
+26.0% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 518 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 01/22/2026 with respect to amended claims 19 and 20 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection in view of Komiya et al. (US 2012/0026207). Claim 7 is canceled. Claims 1-6, 8-18, and 21 are allowed. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim 19 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Komiya et al. (US 2012/0026207 hereinafter Komiya). Referring to claim 19, Komiya discloses a display device (FIG. 1; the organic light emitting display) comprising: a display unit (Fig. 1; 130) partitioned into a plurality of blocks including a plurality of rows and columns of two or more sub-pixels ([0045], Fig. 1; The display unit 130 includes the pixels 140 positioned at the crossing regions of the scan lines S1 to Sn and the data lines D1 to Dm. Thus, each pixel 140 comprises a plurality of sub-pixels), adjacent ones of the blocks being separated by a dividing line where the plurality of rows and columns of the two or more sub-pixels of the adjacent ones of the blocks are located on opposite sides of the dividing line ([0041], Fig. 2, 6A-6D; For example, the panel may be divided into four blocks via lines as illustrated in FIG. 2. A first block 1401 includes a first emission control line E1 to a n/4th emission control line En/4. A second block 1402 includes a (n/4+1)th emission control line En/4+1 to a 2n/4th emission control line E2n/4. A third block 1403 includes a (2n/4+1)th emission control line E2n/4+1 to a (3n/4)th emission control line E3n/4. A fourth block 1404 includes a (3n/4+1)th emission control line E3n/4+1 to an nth emission control line En.), wherein sub-pixels included in different blocks are configured to emit light at different times during one frame period ([0018]; A panel including emission control lines and at least 2 horizontal blocks including pixels for charging voltages according to the data signals when the scan signals are supplied, and for controlling an amount of current supplied to an organic light emitting diode (OLED) when the emission control signals are not supplied, wherein a panel is divided into at least 2 horizontal blocks, and wherein the scan driver is configured to supply the emission control signals at different times to each of the horizontal blocks…, [0045]; The pixels 140 control the amount of current supplied from the first power source ELVDD to the second power source ELVSS via an organic light emitting diode (OLED) according to the data signals in the emission period in one frame. Then, light (e.g., light with a predetermined brightness) is generated by the OLED. Here, during the emission period, the pixels 140 start emission at different times, according to their respective blocks, as illustrated in FIG. 2..., and [0069-0072]; Fig. 6A-6D; each block 1401-1404 emits light at different points in time). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Park et al. (US 2012/0293496 A1 hereinafter Park) in view of Komiya et al. (US 2012/0026207 hereinafter Komiya), and (US 2023/0078842 A1 hereinafter Kim). Referring to claim 20, Park discloses a method of driving a display device, the method comprising: initializing sub-pixels included in a first block and a second block ([0111]; That is, when the display panel is divided into two, the first group pixel areas and the second group pixel areas that emit light in one field are shown together in FIGS. 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B…. and [0112]; In FIGS. 2, 3A, 3B, 4A, and 4B, a plurality of unit areas (hereinafter, referred to as first unit areas) forming an area (hereinafter, first area) where the first group pixels are arranged are respectively denoted as "E", and a plurality of unit areas (hereinafter, referred to as second unit areas) forming an area (hereinafter, referred to as a second area) where the second group pixels are arranged are respectively denoted as "O". Each unit area may be formed of at least one pixel, or may be formed of three sub-pixels R, G, and B.); supplying a first data signal corresponding to an emission time while sequentially selecting the sub-pixels included in the first block and the second block ([0025]; As a stereoscopic image data signal, the image data signal may be a left-eye image data signal or a right-eye image data signal. Then, the first group pixels and the second group pixels may concurrently emit light during a first period and a second period for a period during which a left-eye image is displayed according to a left-eye image data signal in one frame period. Sequentially, the first group pixels and the second group pixels may concurrently emit light during a 1-1 period and a 2-1 period for a period during which a right-eye image is displayed according to a right-eye image data signal in one frame period.); emitting light by the sub-pixels included in the first block during a first period of one frame period ([0025]; As a stereoscopic image data signal, the image data signal may be a left-eye image data signal or a right-eye image data signal. Then, the first group pixels and the second group pixels may concurrently emit light during a first period and a second period for a period during which a left-eye image is displayed according to a left-eye image data signal in one frame period. Sequentially, the first group pixels and the second group pixels may concurrently emit light during a 1-1 period and a 2-1 period for a period during which a right-eye image is displayed according to a right-eye image data signal in one frame period.); emitting light by the sub-pixels included in the second block during a second period that does not overlap the first period of the one frame period ([0259]; As described, the design of the display device can be simplified by arranging the first power voltage to be transmitted to the first unit area pixels E or the second unit area pixels O disposed in two pixel lines, along the first power lines that are alternately disposed along the respective pixel lines. However, as shown in the signal timing diagram of FIG. 6, the first power voltage EVDD transmitted to the first unit area pixels E and the first power voltage OVDD transmitted to the second unit area pixels O are alternately maintained with a high level (e.g., a predetermined high level), and accordingly, the light emission period 4 of the first unit area pixels E and the light emission period 4 of the second unit area pixels O are not overlapped with each other…. And [0025]; As a stereoscopic image data signal, the image data signal may be a left-eye image data signal or a right-eye image data signal. Then, the first group pixels and the second group pixels may concurrently emit light during a first period and a second period for a period during which a left-eye image is displayed according to a left-eye image data signal in one frame period.). However, Park does not explicitly disclose each of the first block and the second block including a plurality of rows and columns of the sub-pixels, adjacent ones of the blocks being separated by a dividing line where the plurality of rows and columns of the two or more sub-pixels of the adjacent ones of the blocks are located on opposite sides of the dividing line; and simultaneously supplying a second data signal corresponding to a driving current to the sub-pixels included in the first block and the second block. In an analogous art, Komiya discloses each of the first block and the second block including a plurality of rows and columns of the sub-pixels ([0045], Fig. 1; The display unit 130 includes the pixels 140 positioned at the crossing regions of the scan lines S1 to Sn and the data lines D1 to Dm. Thus, each pixel 140 comprises a plurality of sub-pixels), adjacent ones of the blocks being separated by a dividing line where the plurality of rows and columns of the two or more sub-pixels of the adjacent ones of the blocks are located on opposite sides of the dividing line ([0041], Fig. 2 and 6A-6D; For example, the panel may be divided into four blocks via lines as illustrated in FIG. 2. A first block 1401 includes a first emission control line E1 to a n/4th emission control line En/4. A second block 1402 includes a (n/4+1)th emission control line En/4+1 to a 2n/4th emission control line E2n/4. A third block 1403 includes a (2n/4+1)th emission control line E2n/4+1 to a (3n/4)th emission control line E3n/4. A fourth block 1404 includes a (3n/4+1)th emission control line E3n/4+1 to an nth emission control line En.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to apply the technique of Komiya to the system of Park in order to allow the panel that is divided into several horizontal blocks and emission points of time of pixels are set to be different from each other in units of horizontal blocks, so that noise emitted at emission points in time of pixels can be minimized. However, Park in view of Komiya does not explicitly disclose simultaneously supplying a second data signal corresponding to a driving current to the sub-pixels included in the first block and the second block. In an analogous art, Kim discloses simultaneously supplying a second data signal corresponding to a driving current to the sub-pixels included in the first block and the second block ([0132], Fig. 2; The second pixel driver PDU2 generates the driving current Ids supplied to the light emitting element EL in response to the first PAM data voltage of the first PAM data line RDL. The second pixel driver PDU2 may be a pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) unit for performing pulse amplitude modulation. In this case, each of the first sub-pixels RP may be a constant current generator that receives the same first PAM data voltage and generates the same driving current Ids regardless of the luminance of the first sub-pixel RP.). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to apply the technique of Kim to the system of Park in view of Komiya in order to reduce or prevent deterioration of an image quality due to the change in the wavelength of the emitted light depending on the driving current applied to an inorganic light emitting diode. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-6, 8-18, and 21 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claims 1-6, 8-18, and 21 are allowed since certain key features of the claimed invention are not taught or fairly suggested by prior art. Referring to amended claim 1, the prior art of record, however, does not teach, disclose or suggest the claimed limitations of (in combination with all other limitations in the claim), “A display device comprising: sub-pixels including a first circuit unit configured to control a supply period of a driving current correspondingly to a first data signal, and a second circuit unit configured to supply the driving current to a light emitting element correspondingly to a second data signal; and a display unit partitioned into j (j is a natural number of 2 or more) blocks including two or more of the sub-pixels, wherein the sub-pixels included in different blocks are configured to emit light at different times, and wherein the first circuit unit comprises: a first transistor having a gate electrode connected to a first node, a first electrode connected to a second node, and a second electrode connected to a third node; a second transistor connected between a data line and the second node, and having a gate electrode connected to a first scan line; a third transistor connected between the first node and the third node and having a gate electrode connected to the first scan line; a fourth transistor connected between the first node and a fourth power line, and having a gate electrode connected to a first initialization line; a fifth transistor connected between a first power line and the second node, and having a gate electrode connected to an emission control line; a sixth transistor connected between the third node and a fourth node, and having a gate electrode connected to the emission control line; and a first capacitor connected between a sweep line and the first node.”. Referring to claims 2-6 and 8-18 are allowable based upon dependent on the independent claim 1. Referring to independent claim 21, the claim is allowed for same reason as set forth in the independent claim 1. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCOTT D AU whose telephone number is (571)272-5948. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. General 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCOTT D AU/ Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 19, 2024
Application Filed
Oct 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 22, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603023
LIGHT MODULATION FOR FOVEATED DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602109
METHOD FOR AUTOMOTIVE DEVICE TO PROJECT IMAGE ONTO WINDSHIELD FOR VIEWING BY PRIMARY VIEWER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586523
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12573350
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573347
DATA DRIVING CIRCUIT AND A DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+11.4%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 518 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month