Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/991,108

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE AIRFRAME PART FOR AN AIRFRAME AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 20, 2024
Priority
Dec 21, 2023 — EU EP 23 219 239.3
Examiner
HARM, NICKOLAS R
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Wingtra AG
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
626 granted / 789 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
807
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
63.7%
+23.7% vs TC avg
§102
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
§112
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 789 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, claims 15-20 in the reply filed on 2/27/2026 is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 17 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 17 recites “one same mold is used” in line 2 after requiring the molds be identical in construction. It is not clear if this requires both a first and a second mold, wherein the molds are the same, or requires that only a single mold be used in the method, which would render the separately claimed molds indefinite. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 15-16 and 18-20 allowed. Claim 17 would be allowable if rewritten to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action and to include all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: LEE (US 2011/0135825) discloses producing a laminate via thermoforming a polycarbonate shell and a polystyrene liner, but is directed towards sports protective equipment. CHEUNG (US 2008/0146102) teaches a method of producing molded materials via heating polystyrene beads in a mold. The prior art of record does not teach such a method to produce an airframe part, wherein the shell covers at least 70% of an exposed surface of the airframe part and bonding the at least one shell part of the shell to the liner over at least 90% of an extension of the at least one shell part by heating the at least one shell part and liner. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: CHOPARD et al. (US 2021/0316673), HICKS et al. (US 2016/0031135), BUEHRING et al. (US 2013/0280517), WHITE, III et al. (US 5,525,641), and ROSENBERG et al. (US 4,615,438. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Nickolas R Harm whose telephone number is (571)270-7605. The examiner can normally be reached 10:00-6:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Phillip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NICKOLAS R HARM/Examiner, Art Unit 1745 /PHILIP C TUCKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 20, 2024
Application Filed
Apr 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12666749
THERMAL DECOMPOSITION APPARATUS AND THERMAL DECOMPOSITION METHOD APPLYING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636873
Device and method for peeling off protective films from plate-shaped objects
2y 5m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629228
Systems And Methods For Managing Surgical Sponges
2y 8m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623390
Method Of Preparation Of A Decorated Wall Or Floor Panels
3y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12623449
Composite Backing Layer Peel Starter
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+5.8%)
2y 3m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 789 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month