Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 18/991,723

MOLD UNIT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Priority
Dec 28, 2023 — JP 2023-222880
Examiner
GHORISHI, SEYED BEHROOZ
Art Unit
1748
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
252 granted / 367 resolved
+3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+44.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
412
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
50.3%
+10.3% vs TC avg
§102
17.8%
-22.2% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 367 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Detailed Office Action The communication dated 5/28/2026 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 4-5 are withdrawn from examination. Claims 1-11 remain pending Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Invention I (claims 1-3 and 6-11) in the reply filed on 5/28/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 4-5 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected Invention II, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 7-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 7 in line 2 recites the limitation “a protrusion”. This limitation is already recited in the independent claim 1 (line 2) that claim 7 depends on. Therefore, it is not clear that the limitation in claim 7 is the same as that in claim 1 or a different one. As such this claim and its dependent claims 8-11are indefinite and rejected. Upon careful review of the instant disclosure, the Examiner determined that the protrusion recited in claim 1 refers to numeral 212 in instant FIG. 1 which is a protrusion on the inside surface of the preform at the neck portion. The protrusion in claim 7 refers to numeral 11 in instant FIG. 1 which is part of the blow core. The applicant needs to distinguish between these two protrusions. For example, the limitation in claim 7 can be changed to “lip” or “protruding section” or “another protrusion”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3 and 6 are allowed. A close prior art to the independent claim 1 is YONEZUKA (JP-2022115774-A and its English translation), hereinafter YONEZUKA. YONEZUKA discloses a mold unit in which a first mold that performs injection molding for molding an intermediate molding product molds a protrusion on an inner surface of a thick portion of the intermediate molding product, and when the intermediate molding product is fitted to a second mold in order to perform blow molding for molding a final molding product from the intermediate molding product {[0002] note injection molding followed by blow molding, thus first and second mold, [FIG. 8(b)] note preform 401 is the intermediate molding product that has protrusions 409 in the area of 408 on an inner surface of the thick portion, [FIG. 9] note the mold core 332 has the recesses 337 that creates the protrusions on the inner surface of the intermediate product}. YONEZUKA, however, fails to disclose the last limitation of claim 1 reciting “the second mold crushes the protrusion from an inside of the intermediate molding product”. YONEZUKA maintains these protrusions throughout the process so that the extra thickness provided by protrusion portion 408 can prevent the occurrences of sink marks on the inner surface of the open end 413 in the final molded product 411 resulting in high strength and quality of the final product {[0028], [FIG. 8(a)]}. Therefore, there is no motivation to have crushed these protrusions as recited in the last limitation of claim 1. The Examiner notes that the advantage of crushing this protrusion as recited and explained in the instant disclosure is that this action smooths the inner surface of the intermediate product without needing extra holding pressure time. Another close prior art to the independent claim 1 is DE CUYPER (US-2021/0260810), hereinafter DE CUYPER. DE CUYPER discloses a mold unit in which a first mold that performs injection molding for molding an intermediate molding product molds a protrusion on an inner surface of a thick portion of the intermediate molding product, and when the intermediate molding product is fitted to a second mold in order to perform blow molding for molding a final molding product from the intermediate molding product {[abstract] note injection molding thus the first mold, preform is the intermediate product, [0001] note stretch blow molding that is the second mold, [FIG. 2B] note the recess 18 on the mold core that produces a protrusion on an inner surface of the preform or the intermediate product, [FIG. 7] note protrusion 18 on the inner surface of the preform neck portion 7}. DE CUYPER, however, fails to disclose the last limitation of claim 1 reciting “the second mold crushes the protrusion from an inside of the intermediate molding product”. DE CUYPER maintains this protrusion since it assists in holding the insert piece 30 that is used as a pouring spout {[0114]-[0115], [FIGs. 7&8]}. Therefore, there is no motivation to have crushed this protrusion as recited in the last limitation of claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI whose telephone number is (571)272-1373. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-(alt Fri) 7:30-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abbas Rashid can be reached at 571-270-7457. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S. BEHROOZ GHORISHI/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1748
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697639
GLUE SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR GYPSUM BOARD, GYPSUM BOARD MANUFACTURING APPARATUS, AND GYPSUM BOARD MANUFACTURING METHOD
3y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693709
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12686181
Induction Welding of Composite Structures
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12686760
ULTRASONIC TRANSDUCER MATCHING LAYER MATERIAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12669164
METHOD FOR JOINING THE ENDS OF A LINEAR BELT IN ORDER TO FORM AN ENDLESS BELT FOR THE TRANSPORT OF FOODSTUFFS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.2%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 367 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month