Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/992,733

DETECTION OF YAW INSTABILITIES IN VEHICLE COMBINATIONS

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER§Other
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Jul 15, 2022 — nonprovisional of PCTEP2022069957
Examiner
LAGUARDA, GONZALO
Art Unit
3747
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Volvo Group
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
73%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 73% — above average
73%
Career Allowance Rate
514 granted / 707 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
765
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
73.6%
+33.6% vs TC avg
§102
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§112
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER §Other
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8, 9, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Hajiloo (U.S. Pat. No. 11,787,394). Regarding claim 1, Hajiloo discloses a method of detecting a yaw instability in a vehicle combination, the vehicle combination comprising a tractor unit and at least one trailing unit (col. 8, lines 35-44), the method comprising: determining a current value of a longitudinal slip of at least one wheel of at least one unit of the vehicle combination (col. 12, lines 58-67); comparing the current value of the longitudinal slip to a threshold (col. 17, lines 25-30); and if the current value is beyond the threshold, determining that an upcoming or ongoing yaw instability is present in the vehicle combination (col. 17, lines 18-27); wherein the threshold is a fixed threshold determined based on the slip ratio of the wheel at a maximum longitudinal tire force (col. 17, line 29), or a variable threshold determined based on the inverse of a current value of a lateral acceleration of the tractor unit, a lateral acceleration of the trailing unit, a road wheel angle of the tractor unit, a road wheel angle of the trailing unit, and/or an articulation angle of consecutive units (fixed option addressed). Regarding claim 2 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses comprising determining the current value of the longitudinal slip using one or more sensors on the vehicle combination (col. 11, lines 55-67 discloses using sensors). Regarding claim 3 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses wherein the current value of the longitudinal slip is a maximum longitudinal slip value (the measurements are of instances and not averages) or an average longitudinal slip value determined from longitudinal slip values from a plurality of wheels. Regarding claim 4 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses comprising determining that an upcoming or ongoing yaw instability is present in the vehicle combination if the current values of longitudinal slip of a plurality of wheels are all beyond the threshold (col. 17, line 29 discloses an issue when one wheel is in this state and so if multiple wheels are in that state this system would also recognize an issue). Regarding claim 6 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses wherein the slip ratio is dependent on the tire type (friction option addressed) and/or a road surface friction coefficient (col. 2, lines 40-58). Regarding claim 8 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses comprising determining that a jack-knife is present in the vehicle combination if the current value of the longitudinal slip of at least one wheel of the tractor unit is beyond the threshold (The comparison of the value to a threshold has been addressed above. The threshold for it to be considered a jack-knife is subjection and construed to be addressed above since this is not requiring a new or different threshold. That just leaves that this is labeling of the data with no subsequent action which is considered meaningless extrasolution activity. For this type of data labeling see Lavoie U.S. Pat. No. 9,616,923). Regarding claim 9 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses comprising determining that trailer swing is present in the vehicle combination if the current value of the longitudinal slip of at least one wheel of the trailing unit is beyond the threshold (The comparison of the value to a threshold has been addressed above. The threshold for it to be considered a jack-knife is subjection and construed to be addressed above since this is not requiring a new or different threshold. That just leaves that this is labeling of the data with no subsequent action which is considered meaningless extrasolution activity. For this type of data labeling see Lavoie U.S. Pat. No. 9,616,923). Regarding claim 14 which depends from claim 1, Hajiloo discloses A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon instructions that, when executed by one or more processors cause execution of the method steps according to claim 1 (the limitations of this claim have been addressed in claim 1). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Please review when considering a response to this office action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GONZALO LAGUARDA whose telephone number is (571)272-5920. The examiner can normally be reached 8-5 M-Th Alt. F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Logan Kraft can be reached at (571) 270-5065. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. GONZALO LAGUARDA Primary Examiner Art Unit 3747 email: gonzalo.laguarda@uspto.gov /GONZALO LAGUARDA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §OTHER, §Other (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12661995
BRAKING CONTROL METHOD AND SYSTEM, VEHICLE, STORAGE MEDIUM AND CHIP
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12643532
WHEEL SLIP-BASED CONTROL FOR ACCELERATING AND DECELERATING HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLES
2y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12630220
MODULAR KINEMATIC STEERING DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12630130
VEHICLE TRAVEL CONTROL DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631153
Fuel Injection System and Method of Controlling a Fuel Injection System
2y 0m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
73%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 9m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month