Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 05, 2026
Application No. 18/996,616

METHOD AND APPARATUS OF PROCESSING VIDEO DATA STREAM, METHOD AND APPARATUS OF PROCESSING IMAGE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
Jun 25, 2023 — CN 202310755825.3 +1 more
Examiner
SHIBRU, HELEN
Art Unit
2484
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
Est. Remaining
62%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
451 granted / 768 resolved
+0.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
16 currently pending
Career history
793
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
§103
56.8%
+16.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.8%
-18.2% vs TC avg
§112
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 768 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Species 1 (Figure 1) in the reply filed 03/17/2026 is acknowledged. Applicant stated claims 1-9, 14, 16 and 17 read on the elected species; however, claim 16 reads on the non-elected Species, figure 2. Therefore, claim 16 is withdrawn from further consideration along with claims 10-11, 15 and 19. Claims 12-13 and 18 were previously canceled. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-9, 14 and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tandon (US PG PUB 2020/0169767). Regarding claim 1, Tandon discloses a method of processing a video data stream, comprising: determining N video data streams from N image acquisition devices, wherein each video data stream comprises at least one data package, and N is an integer greater than or equal to 2 (see figure 2, paragraphs 0040 and 0042, receiving video streams from source terminals 202a, 202b up to 202n); dividing a plurality of data packages in the N video data streams into N data package sets, where each data package set corresponds to a video data stream (see paragraph 0042 grouping video frames from the plurality of video streams VS1 to VSn); determining N first queues respectively corresponding to the N data package sets, wherein each first queue contains a first storage address in a first storage space for each data package in a data package set corresponding to the first queue (see paragraph 0013 identifying regions or areas where the video frame are positioned; see paragraph 0042 grouping based on corresponding timestamp; see figures 3A-3C and paragraphs 0043-0046 video frame within the multiplexed video stream are organized or located in any number of configuration, including vertical stacking; horizontal stacking and hybrid stacking; see paragraph 0066 attributes comprises one or more of respective location corresponding to individual video frames or sub frames; correlating a location/region/corresponding area occupied by each individual video frame or sub-frame within the composite video frame, with a source terminal; see also paragraph 0069 and figures 3A-3C); and sending the N first queues (see figures 3A-3C, 5 and 6, paragraphs 0039, receiving a multiplexed video signal, demultiplexing, and output/playing back the received video bitstreams; see paragraph 0066 transmitting to end point terminal a definition message defining a set of attributes; see also paragraph 0069). Regarding claim 2, Tandon discloses the dividing a plurality of data packages in the N video data streams into N data package sets comprises: determining a video identification of a video data stream where each data package is located; dividing the plurality of data packages according to the video identification to obtain N initial data package sets; and determining the N data package sets according to the N initial data package sets (see paragraphs 0048-0049). Regarding claim 3, Tandon discloses the determining the N data package sets according to the N initial data package sets comprises: ranking the data packages in the initial data package set according to sequence numbers of the data packages in the initial data package set, so as to obtain a data package sequence; and determining the data package set according to the data package sequence (see figures 3A-3C and paragraphs 0043-0046). Regarding claim 4, Tandon discloses the data package set comprises at least one data package subset, each data package subset comprises at least one data package, and each data package subset corresponds to an image frame; the determining N first queues respectively corresponding to the N data package sets comprises: adding the first storage address for a current data package to the first queue in response to a detection that the first storage address for a previous data package is contained in the first queue, wherein the current data package and the previous data package belong to the same data package subset; and adding the first storage address for a current data package subset to the first queue in response to a detection that the first storage address for a previous data package subset is contained in the first queue, wherein the current data package subset and the previous data package subset belong to the same data package set (see paragraphs 0013, 0024, 0043-0047, 0056-0057 and 0066). Regarding claim 5, Tandon discloses the data package set comprises at least one data package subset, and each data package subset corresponds to an image frame; the sending the N first queues comprises: sending a target storage address in the first queue in response to a detection that the target storage address in the first queue meets a predetermined condition, wherein the predetermined condition comprises that the data packages indicated by the target storage address are used to determine an image frame (see figures 5-6 and paragraphs 0057-0058). Regarding claim 6, Tandon discloses the predetermined condition further comprises that a quantity of image frames corresponding to the N data package sets is greater than or equal to a threshold (see paragraphs 0061 and 0066). Regarding claim 7, Tandon discloses removing a plurality of target data packages from the first storage space in response to the plurality of target data packages being read from the first storage space (see paragraphs 0056-0057 and 0059-0060). Regarding claim 8, Tandon discloses determining a target adjustment parameter according to a scene identification of a target scene, wherein the target adjustment parameter comprises at least one of a target quantity of image acquisition devices and a target acquisition frequency of the image acquisition device; adjusting an actual quantity of image acquisition devices according to the target quantity of image acquisition devices, in response to a detection that the target adjustment parameter comprises the target quantity of image acquisition devices; and adjusting an actual acquisition frequency of the image acquisition device according to the target acquisition frequency of the image acquisition device, in response to a detection that the target adjustment parameter comprises the target acquisition frequency of the image acquisition device (see paragraphs 0047, 0048, 0051 and 0061). Regarding claim 9, Tandon discloses the data package comprises a network abstract layer unit (see figure 1 and paragraphs 0003-0004, 0026-0027 and also 0070). Regarding claim 14, Tandon discloses an apparatus of processing a video data stream, comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores instructions executable by the processor, and the instructions are configured to, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform the method of claim 1 (see paragraph 0082 and claim 1 rejection above). Regarding claim 17, Tandon discloses a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions thereon, wherein the computer instructions are configured to cause a computer to perform the method of claim 1 (see paragraph 0082 and claim 1 rejection above). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HELEN SHIBRU whose telephone number is (571)272-7329. The examiner can normally be reached M-TR 8:00AM-5:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, THAI TRAN can be reached at 571 272 7382. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HELEN SHIBRU/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2484 March 26, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Apr 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12670933
Digital video production systems and methods
11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12640023
CAMERA CAPABLE OF SELECTIVE DATA TRANSMISSION FOR PRIVACY PROTECTION
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12639947
PERSONALIZED GENERATIVE VIDEO SUMMARIZATION
1y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633313
SCRIPT BASED VIDEO EFFECTS FOR LIVE VIDEO
2y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12634563
AUTOMATED TRAILER GENERATION
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
62%
With Interview (+3.3%)
3y 11m (~2y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 768 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month