Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/999,290

ADAPTIVE QUANTIZATION AND COMPRESSION FOR VARIABLE-LENGTH COLLECTIVE COMMUNICATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Examiner
MAI, LAM T
Art Unit
2845
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Amd
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
96%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 96% — above average
96%
Career Allowance Rate
982 granted / 1022 resolved
+28.1% vs TC avg
Minimal +1% lift
Without
With
+0.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 6m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
1032
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§103
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§102
32.3%
-7.7% vs TC avg
§112
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1022 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the claim" on line 8. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Claims 2-7 are rejected under 112(b) as well as being dependent on based rejected claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-20 are allowable. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 1 is allowed over the closest prior art of record, only when the 112(b) rejections indicated above is resolved. The closes prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest invented features, which is “selectively reducing a size of variable-length input data scheduled to be transferred between a first process of the plurality of processes and the other processes of the plurality of processes for a collective operation based on the variable-length input data exceeding the fixed size of the buffer”, structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claim and dependent claims. Claim 8 is allowed over the closest prior art of record. The closes prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest invented features, which is “reducing a precision of an aggregate of variable-length input data scheduled to be received by each process of a plurality of processes from other processes of the plurality of processes for a collective operation based on the aggregate of variable-length input data exceeding a predefined size limit”, structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claim and dependent claims. Claim 16 is allowed over the closest prior art of record. The closes prior art of record, considered individually or in combination, fails to fairly teach or suggest invented features, which is “reduce a precision of an aggregate of variable-length input data scheduled to be received by each process of the plurality of processes from the other processes of the plurality of processes for a collective operation based on the aggregate of variable-length input data exceeding a predefined size limit”, structurally and functionally interconnected with other limitations in the manner as cited in the claim and dependent claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Cited References The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Cited references are related to instant application subject matters. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAM T MAI whose telephone number is (571)272-1807. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 6am-2pm eastern time. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dameon Levi can be reached at 571 272-2105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAM T MAI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2845
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12695464
SIGMA-DELTA MODULATOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A SIGMA-DELTA MODULATOR
2y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12676624
SELF-CALIBRATING DELAY LINE FLASH ADC AND TRACKING CIRCUITRY
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12676622
ADAPTIVE CANCELLATION OF INTER-SYMBOL INTERFERENCE IN HIGH-SPEED CONTINUOUS-TIME DIGITAL-TO-ANALOG CONVERTERS
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671426
Segmented digital-to-analog converter with digital segment mismatch correction and subtractive segment mismatch dithering
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12665610
Digitally Trimmable Input Current Cancellation Circuit For Analog-To-Digital Converter
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
96%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+0.8%)
1y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1022 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month