Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 16, 2026
Application No. 18/999,375

DISPLAY DEVICE, METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Dec 23, 2024
Examiner
TUNG, DAVID
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 12m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
355 granted / 575 resolved
At TC average
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+19.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
593
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.3%
-38.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.5%
+16.5% vs TC avg
§102
30.6%
-9.4% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 575 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 & 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Further, the submitted terminal disclaimer on 11/14/2025 was disapproved on 11/16/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 7-8, 14, & 18-19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Lin et al. (US 20220036827). As to claim 1, Lin discloses a display device [abstract], comprising: a timing controller (control logic 104) [figs. 1 & 3 & para. 24 & 34-36] configured to generate a control signal using a clock signal (light emitting clock signal em_clk) [figs. 1, 3, 6c, & 7b & para. 34-36 & 58-61] determined based on a frame frequency (power save mode & normal mode utilize different frame rate) [figs. 6c & 7b & para. 58] of the display device; a pixel (active region 300 with plurality of subpixels) [fig. 3 & para. 34] connected to a scan line (gate lines g1 to gm) [fig. 3 & para. 40], a data line (source lines s1 to sn) [fig. 3 & para. 42], and an emission control line (emission lines e1 to ek) [fig. 3 & para. 41]; an emission driver (light emitting driver 302) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply an emission control signal (emission signals) [fig. 3 & 4b & para. 41] to the emission control line in response to an emission start signal included in the control signal; a scan driver (gate scanning driver 304) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply a scan signal (scan signals) [fig. 3 & 4a & para. 40] to the scan line in response to the control signal; and a data driver (source writing driver 306) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply a data signal (display data signals) [fig. 3 & para. 42] to the data line in response to the control signal, wherein a number of off periods of the emission control signal included in one frame is fixed when the frame frequency is changed (light emitting enable signal em_stv) [fig. 6c & 7b & para. 58-61]. As to claim 7, Lin discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein a ratio occupied by an off period of the emission control signal in the one frame is fixed when the frame frequency is changed (light emitting enable signal em_stv) [fig. 6c & 7b & para. 58-61]. As to claim 8, Lin discloses the display device according to claim 1, wherein the timing controller receives a mode control signal including a mode corresponding to the frame frequency (signal indicating determination of still or slow-moving images changes mode from normal mode to power saving mode) [figs. 6c & 7b & para. 20-21 & 58]. As to claim 14, Lin discloses an electronic device [abstract], comprising: a processor (control logic 104) [figs. 1 & 3 & para. 24 & 34-36] configured to output an image data [figs. 1 & 3 & para. 24 & 34-36], and to generate a control signal [figs. 1, 3, 6c, & 7b & para. 34-36 & 58-61] determined based on a frame frequency (power save mode & normal mode utilize different frame rate) [figs. 6c & 7b & para. 58]; a display panel (active region 300 with plurality of subpixels) [fig. 3 & para. 34] controlled by the control signal to display an image corresponding to the image data [figs. 1 & 3 & para. 34-36]; an emission driver (light emitting driver 302) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply an emission control signal (emission signals) [fig. 3 & 4b & para. 41] to the display panel in response to an emission start signal (emission lines e1 to ek) [fig. 3 & para. 41] included in the control signal [fig. 6c]; a scan driver (gate scanning driver 304) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply a scan signal (scan signals) [fig. 3 & 4a & para. 40] to scan lines (gate lines g1 to gm) [fig. 3 & para. 40] in response to the control signal, a data driver (source writing driver 306) [fig. 3 & para. 34] configured to supply a data signal (display data signals) [fig. 3 & para. 42] to data lines (source lines s1 to sn) [fig. 3 & para. 42] in response to the control signal, wherein a number of off periods of the emission control signal included in one frame is fixed when the frame frequency is changed (light emitting enable signal em_stv) [fig. 6c & 7b & para. 58-61]. As to claim 18, Lin discloses the electronic device according to claim 14, wherein a ratio occupied by an off period of the emission control signal in the one frame is fixed when the frame frequency is changed (light emitting enable signal em_stv) [fig. 6c & 7b & para. 58-61]. As to claim 19, Lin discloses the electronic device according to claim 14, wherein the processor receives a mode control signal including a mode corresponding to the frame frequency (signal indicating determination of still or slow-moving images changes mode from normal mode to power saving mode) [figs. 6c & 7b & para. 20-21 & 58]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 2, 4-6, 9-13, 15, 17, & 20 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID TUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-3385. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 10:00AM - 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at (571)-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID TUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 23, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 14, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 09, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603413
ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING ANTENNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597399
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592181
PIXEL CIRCUIT AND MICRO LED DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12592201
GATE DRIVER AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS INCLUDING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12575308
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+19.5%)
2y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 575 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month