Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/002,896

LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE, DRIVING METHOD OF THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Examiner
ZHENG, XUEMEI
Art Unit
2629
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
598 granted / 707 resolved
+22.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
730
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.0%
-39.0% vs TC avg
§103
41.4%
+1.4% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 707 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-3 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Kimura (US 2003/0090481). Regarding claim 2, Kimura teaches a display device ([0012]) comprising: a gate driver (Fig. 14: driver circuit portion; [0327]), wherein the gate driver comprises a first transistor (Figs. 13-14: left TFT, located between wiring 5040 and 5041, of driver circuit portion; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B below and note “First transistor” labeled) and a second transistor (Figs. 13-14: right TFT, located between wiring 5041 and 5042, of driver circuit portion; Note: Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B below and note “Second transistor” labeled), PNG media_image1.png 281 883 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein the first transistor comprises: a first conductive layer (Figs. 13-14: first conductive layer 5015a) configured to be a gate of the first transistor; a first semiconductor layer (Figs. 13-14: N-type semiconductor layer sandwiched between regions 5025-5026) a second conductive layer (Figs. 14: wirings 5040-5042) over the first semiconductor layer, the second conductive layer configured to be one of a source and a drain of the first transistor (Figs. 13-14), wherein the second transistor comprises: a third conductive layer (Figs. 13-14: conductive layer 5016a) configured to be a gate of the second transistor; a second semiconductor layer (Figs. 13-14: semiconductor layer sandwiched between regions 5028-5029) the second conductive layer over the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 14: wirings 5040-5042), the second conductive layer configured to be one of a source and a drain of the second transistor (Figs. 13-14), wherein the second conductive layer comprises a first opening (Fig. 14: opening in wirings 5040-5042 that is filled with insulting film 5038; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “First opening” labeled) and a second opening (Fig. 14: opening in wirings 5040-5042 that is filled with insulating film for right TFT of driver circuit portion; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “Second opening” labeled) both between a channel formation region of the first transistor and a channel formation region of the second transistor (Fig. 14), wherein the first opening comprises a region overlapping the first semiconductor layer and a region not overlapping the first semiconductor layer (Figs. 14B-14C), wherein the first opening comprises a region overlapping the first conductive layer and a region not overlapping the first conductive layer (Figs. 14B-14C), wherein the second opening comprises a region overlapping the second semiconductor layer and a region not overlapping the second semiconductor layer (Figs. 14B-14C), and wherein the second opening comprises a region overlapping the third conductive layer and a region not overlapping the third conductive layer (Fig-s. 14B-14C). In this embodiment, Kimura does not further teach that the first semiconductor is over the first conductive layer and that the second semiconductor is over the second conductive layer. The differentiating limitations indicate that in the instant invention the first and second TFTs have a bottom gate electrode structure (i.e., a gate electrode disposed below a respective semiconductor layer of a TFT). Kimura’s first and second TFTs in Figs. 13-14, however, employ a top gate electrode structure (i.e., a gate electrode disposed above a respective semiconductor layer of a TFT). However, using TFTs with a bottom gate electrode structure is not new. Kimura, in another embodiment ([0396]), teaches use of a TFT with a bottom gate electrode structure, i.e., “it is acceptable that the top gate structure where the gate electrode is laid over a semiconductor film (channel forming region) or the bottom gate structure reverse to this is used”. Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious for one ordinary skill in the art to replace the top gate electrode structure with a bottom gate electrode structure for the two transistors in Kimura’s gate driver. As taught by Kimura in [0396], there are two options to arrange a gate electrode in a TFT, one ordinary skill in the art would try either one to optimize the performance. Regarding claim 3, Kimura teaches a display device ([0012]) comprising: a gate driver (Fig. 14: driver circuit portion; [0327]), wherein the gate driver comprises a first transistor (Fig. 5A: TFT 504 or TFT 507; Figs. 13-14: left TFT, located between wiring 5040 and 5041, of driver circuit portion; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “First transistor” labeled) and a second transistor (Fig. A: the other one of TFT 504 and TFT 507 not reading on the first transistor; Figs. 13-14: right TFT, located between wiring 5041 and 5042, of driver circuit portion; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “Second transistor” labeled), wherein the first transistor comprises: a first conductive layer (Figs. 13-14: first conductive layer 5015a) configured to be a gate of the first transistor; a first semiconductor layer (Figs. 13-14: N-type semiconductor layer sandwiched between regions 5025-5026) a second conductive layer (Figs. 14: wirings 5040-5042) over the first semiconductor layer, the second conductive layer configured to be one of a source and a drain of the first transistor (Figs. 13-14), wherein the second transistor comprises: a third conductive layer (Figs. 13-14: conductive layer 5016a) configured to be a gate of the second transistor; a second semiconductor layer (Figs. 13-14: semiconductor layer sandwiched between regions 5028-5029) the second conductive layer over the second semiconductor layer (Fig. 14: wirings 5040-5042), the second conductive layer configured to be one of a source and a drain of the second transistor (Figs. 13-14), wherein the second conductive layer comprises a first opening (Fig. 14: opening in wirings 5040-5042 that is filled with insulting film 5038; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “First opening” labeled) and a second opening (Fig. 14: opening in wirings 5040-5042 that is filled with insulating film for right TFT of driver circuit portion; Note: see reproduced Fig. 14B above and note “First opening” labeled) both between a channel formation region of the first transistor and a channel formation region of the second transistor (Fig. 14), wherein the first opening comprises a region overlapping the first semiconductor layer and a region not overlapping the first semiconductor layer (Figs. 14B-14C), wherein the first opening comprises a region overlapping the first conductive layer and a region not overlapping the first conductive layer (Figs. 14B-14C), wherein the second opening comprises a region overlapping the second semiconductor layer and a region not overlapping the second semiconductor layer (Figs. 14B-14C), wherein the second opening comprises a region overlapping the third conductive layer and a region not overlapping the third conductive layer (Fig-s. 14B-14C), and wherein the second conductive layer is electrically connected to a wiring outputting a signal having a pulse waveform (Fig. 5A: first gate signal line 502 and second gate signal line 503 each output a signal having a pulse waveform). In this embodiment, Kimura does not further teach that the first semiconductor is over the first conductive layer and that the second semiconductor is over the second conductive layer. The differentiating limitations indicate that in the instant invention the first and second TFTs have a bottom gate electrode structure (i.e., a gate electrode disposed below a respective semiconductor layer of a TFT). Kimura’s first and second TFTs in Figs. 13-14, however, employ a top gate electrode structure (i.e., a gate electrode disposed above a respective semiconductor layer of a TFT). However, using TFTs with a bottom gate electrode structure is not new. Kimura, in another embodiment ([0396]), teaches use of a TFT with a bottom gate electrode structure, i.e., “it is acceptable that the top gate structure where the gate electrode is laid over a semiconductor film (channel forming region) or the bottom gate structure reverse to this is used”. Before the effective filing date of the invention, it would have been obvious for one ordinary skill in the art to replace the top gate electrode structure with a bottom gate electrode structure for the two transistors in Kimura’s gate driver. As taught by Kimura in [0396], there are two options to arrange a gate electrode in a TFT, one ordinary skill in the art would try either one to optimize the performance. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed on 12/4/2025 with regard to claims 2-3 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant appears to misunderstand the interpretation of the second opening of the second conductive layer in the previous Office action. In this Office action, the interpretations of both the first opening and the second opening of the second conductive layer are specifically labelled in the reproduced Fig. 14B (see prior art rejections above for details) for better understanding. Rejections to claims 2-3 are maintained. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to XUEMEI ZHENG whose telephone number is (571)272-1434. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 9:30 pm-6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached at 571-272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /XUEMEI ZHENG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2024
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 04, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12596441
Chinese Character Input Method, System and Keyboard
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12572318
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DYNAMICALLY SHARING MEDIA BASED ON CONTACT PROXIMITY, GROUP PARTICIPATION, OR EVENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563939
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12554140
POSITIONING, STABILISING, AND INTERFACING STRUCTURES AND SYSTEM INCORPORATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12554136
COLOR CORRECTION FOR XR DISPLAY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+14.0%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 707 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month