Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/003,983

Dynamic Adjustment of Cross-Sectional Views

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Priority
Oct 07, 2019 — CIP of 10/950,046 +4 more
Examiner
WU, CHONG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Procore Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 497 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.3%
+27.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Status This Office Action is responsive to claims filed on 03/24/2025. Please note Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216971 in view of Ritchey (US 10957075 B2). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11914935 in view of Ritchey (US 10957075 B2). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11409929 in view of Ritchey (US 10957075 B2). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10943038 in view of Ritchey (US 10957075 B2). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 12216971 U.S. Patent No. 11914935 U.S. Patent No. 11409929 U.S. Patent No. 10943038 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the computing device to: 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing device is configured to: 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing device is configured to: 1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing system is configured to: 1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor and thereby cause the computing system to be configured to: generate a two-dimensional (2D) view of a three-dimensional (3D) drawing file, wherein the 2D view comprises: display a representation of a three-dimensional (3D) drawing file; generate a two-dimensional view of a three-dimensional drawing file; display, via a user interface of the computing device, the two-dimensional view that includes: generate a two-dimensional view of a three-dimensional drawing file, wherein the two-dimensional view includes: receive a request to generate a cross-sectional view of a three-dimensional drawing file, a first cross-sectional view of a first mesh at a first depth of the first mesh, receive first user input indicating a location of a cross-section indicator within the representation of the 3D drawing file; display a two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional view of the 3D drawing file based on the location of the cross-section indicator within the representation of the 3D drawing file, a cross-sectional view that is based on a location of a reference indicator within a representation of the three-dimensional drawing file, a cross-sectional view that is based on a location of a reference indicator within the three-dimensional drawing file, wherein the cross-sectional view is based on a location of a cross-section line within the three-dimensional drawing file…; generate the cross-sectional view of the three-dimensional drawing file; a second mesh intersecting the first mesh, and first dimensioning information associated with at least one of the first or second meshes; the 2D cross-sectional view including (i) an intersection of at least two meshes and (ii) dimensioning information involving at least one of the two meshes; an intersection of a first mesh with at least a second mesh within the three-dimensional drawing file, and dimensioning information involving at least one of the first or second meshes; an intersection of two meshes within the three-dimensional drawing file, and dimensioning information involving at least one of the two meshes; and wherein the cross-sectional view… includes an intersection of two meshes within the three-dimensional drawing file; add, to the generated cross-sectional view, dimensioning information involving at least one of the two meshes; receive user input indicating an adjustment of the first depth to a second depth of the first mesh, wherein the first and second depths are different; and based on the user input, receive second user input indicating one or more adjustments to the location of the 2D cross-section indicator within the representation of the 3D drawing file; and based on each adjustment indicated by the second user input, receive, via the user interface, a user input indicating an adjustment of the location of the reference indicator within the representation of the three-dimensional drawing file; and based on the user input, based on an input indicating an adjustment of the location of the reference indicator, generate one or more controls for adjusting the location of the cross-section line within the three-dimensional drawing file; and based on an input indicating a selection of the one or more controls: adjust the location of the cross-section line within the three-dimensional drawing file; dynamically update the 2D view, wherein the updated 2D view comprises: a second cross-sectional view of the first mesh at the second depth, the second mesh intersecting the first mesh, a third mesh intersecting the first mesh, and second dimensioning information associated with at least one of the first, second, or third meshes. (i) dynamically update the 2D cross-sectional view being displayed and (ii) dynamically update dimensioning information corresponding to the 2D cross-sectional view being displayed. (i) update the cross-sectional view and (ii) update the dimensioning information to correspond to the updated cross-sectional view. (i) update the cross-sectional view and (ii) update the dimensioning information to correspond to the updated cross-sectional view. update the cross-sectional view based on the adjusted location of the cross-section line; and update the dimensioning information to correspond to the updated cross-sectional view. Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216971, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11914935, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11409929, and claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10943038 do not disclose receive user input indicating an adjustment of the first depth to a second depth of the first mesh, wherein the first and second depths are different. However, in the same field of endeavor, Ritchey discloses receive user input indicating an adjustment of the first depth to a second depth of the first mesh, wherein the first and second depths are different (Ritchey Col 6 Line 63, “Each cross-sectional image in the series of cross-sectional images may represent a cross-section of component 12 at a different depth along the perspective, such that the series proceeds in a direction along the perspective. For example, component imaging device may be configured to generate a plurality of cross-sectional images of component 12 at different depths along the perspective. In other examples, the perspective may be along a different axis (e.g., x-axis or y-axis) or an intermediate position not parallel to any of the axes.”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216971, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11914935, claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11409929, or claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 10943038 with the feature of receiving user input indicating an adjustment of the first depth to a second depth of the first mesh, wherein the first and second depths are different. Doing so could generate a plurality of cross-sectional images of the target object at different depths, as taught by Ritchey (Col 6 line 67). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Panescu (US 20170181809 A1) – this reference teaches a cross-sectional slice portion of the 3D image can be selected for display on a computer display screen to show cross-sectional representations of the anatomical structure at different angular cross-sections and at different depths from the surface of the structure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5207. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Wu can be reached at 571-272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657848
INGESTION PIPELINE FOR GENERATING AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT GENERATORS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657827
TESSELLATION HARDWARE SUBDIVISION OF PATCHES INTO SUB-PATCHES
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646275
THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT MANIPULATION CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646276
TRANSFORMING IMAGE INCLUDING NON-DIRECTIONAL OBJECT AND DIRECTIONAL OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646249
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING A TASK
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.3%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month