Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 4 (57%) |
| §102 only | 2 (29%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (14%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| OBAID, HAMZEH M | 1 | 38.9% | +21.8% |
| DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H | 1 | 22.7% | +24.0% |
| HENRY, MATTHEW D | 1 | 30.2% | +20.9% |
| OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 1 | 16.3% | +14.3% |
| LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1 | 22.2% | +30.7% |
| YESILDAG, LAURA G | 1 | 35.2% | +41.3% |
| MITCHELL, NATHAN A | 1 | 73.3% | +10.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17879709 | Computer Systems and Methods for Determining Recommended Cost Codes for Time Entries | MITCHELL, NATHAN A | 10d overdue |
| 18619072 | Computing System and Method for Creating and Executing Attribute-Specific Predictive Analytics Pipelines for a Construction Project | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1d overdue |
| 18753289 | Computing Platform and Method for Predicting Construction Project Performance Based on Usage of a Construction Management Software Application | DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H | 8d |
| 18633047 | Computing Platform and Method for Establishing a Collaborative Relationship Between Parties Involved on a Construction Project | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 27d |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 34d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18662404 | Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Parameters | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 50d overdue |
| 18961564 | Determination of Insights for Construction Projects | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 29d overdue |
| 17879709 | Computer Systems and Methods for Determining Recommended Cost Codes for Time Entries | MITCHELL, NATHAN A | 10d overdue |
| 18619072 | Computing System and Method for Creating and Executing Attribute-Specific Predictive Analytics Pipelines for a Construction Project | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1d overdue |
| 18753289 | Computing Platform and Method for Predicting Construction Project Performance Based on Usage of a Construction Management Software Application | DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H | 8d |
| 18633047 | Computing Platform and Method for Establishing a Collaborative Relationship Between Parties Involved on a Construction Project | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 27d |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3624 | 2 |
| 3629 | 2 |
| 3625 | 1 |
| 3622 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18961564 | Determination of Insights for Construction Projects | OBAID, HAMZEH M | 3624 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 29d overdue | Pending | Nov 27, 2024 |
| 18753289 | Computing Platform and Method for Predicting Construction Project Performance Based on Usage of a Construction Management Software Application | DIVELBISS, MATTHEW H | 3624 | §101 | Final Rejection | 8d | Pending | Jun 25, 2024 |
| 18662404 | Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Construction Project Parameters | HENRY, MATTHEW D | 3625 | Other | Final Rejection | 50d overdue | Pending | May 13, 2024 |
| 18633047 | Computing Platform and Method for Establishing a Collaborative Relationship Between Parties Involved on a Construction Project | OSMAN BILAL AHMED, AFAF | 3622 | §102 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Apr 11, 2024 |
| 18619072 | Computing System and Method for Creating and Executing Attribute-Specific Predictive Analytics Pipelines for a Construction Project | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 3629 | §101 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Mar 27, 2024 |
| 18297122 | Computer System and Method for Construction Project Prequalification and Management | YESILDAG, LAURA G | 3629 | §101 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Apr 07, 2023 |
| 17879709 | Computer Systems and Methods for Determining Recommended Cost Codes for Time Entries | MITCHELL, NATHAN A | 3627 | §101 | Non-Final OA | 10d overdue | Pending | Aug 02, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial