Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/004,006

Dynamic Dimensioning Indicators

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Dec 27, 2024
Priority
Oct 07, 2019 — CIP of 10/950,046 +5 more
Examiner
WU, CHONG
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Procore Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
429 granted / 497 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+3.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 0m
Avg Prosecution
18 currently pending
Career history
510
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
67.3%
+27.3% vs TC avg
§102
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 497 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Status This Office Action is responsive to claims filed on 02/27/2024. Please note Claims 1-20 are pending and have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216970 in view of Hopper (US 10706618 B2). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11836422 in view of Hopper (US 10706618 B2). Claims 1-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11501040 in view of Hopper (US 10706618 B2). Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 12216970 U.S. Patent No. 11836422 U.S. Patent No. 11501040 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium; and 1. A computing device comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and 1. A computing system comprising: at least one processor; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; and program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the computing device to: program instructions stored on the at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing device is configured to: program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing device is configured to: program instructions stored on the non-transitory computer-readable medium that are executable by the at least one processor such that the computing system is configured to: generate a two-dimensional (2D) view of a three-dimensional (3D) drawing file, wherein the 2D view comprises (i) a cross-sectional view of a first mesh, and (ii) a second mesh and display a two-dimensional (2D) cross-sectional view of a three-dimensional drawing file, the 2D cross-sectional view including at least two meshes; display a cross-sectional view of a three-dimensional drawing file, the cross- sectional view including an intersection of at least two meshes within the three-dimensional drawing file; generate a cross-sectional view of a three-dimensional drawing file, wherein the cross-sectional view includes an intersection of at least two meshes within the three-dimensional drawing file; a third mesh each intersecting the first mesh; receive a first user input indicating selection of a given area of the second mesh; receive a set of user inputs indicating a request for dimensioning information to be added to the 2D cross-sectional view, wherein the set of user inputs (i) indicates a selection point in the 2D cross-sectional view and (ii) comprises a drag input; receive a first user input indicating a selection of a first mesh; receive a first user input indicating a selection of a first mesh, wherein the selection comprises a selection point that establishes a first end point for dimensioning information; based on the first user input, determine a first end point on the second mesh; based on the selection point, establish a first end point at a first mesh; and Claim 1. … after receiving the first user input, establish a first end point for dimensioning information to be added to the cross-sectional view… Claim 1. … based on receiving the first user input: generate a first representation indicating an alignment of the first end point with at least one corresponding geometric feature of the first mesh… receive one or more subsequent user inputs for providing dimensioning information that indicates a distance between the first end point on the second mesh and a second end point within the 2D view; and based on the drag input: display, along a given direction, a representation of second dimensioning information involving the first mesh; and Claim 1. …receive a second user input indicating a given direction along which the dimensioning information is to be added; Claim 1. …generate a second representation indicating a set of one or more directions, originating from the first end point, along which the dimensioning information may be added to the cross-sectional view; receive a second user input indicating a given direction, from the set of one or more directions, along which the dimensioning information is to be added; based on the one or more subsequent user inputs, dynamically update the 2D view to include the dimensioning information. dynamically update the representation of the second dimensioning information originating from the first end point to a second end point. based on the second user input, generate a dynamic representation of the dimensioning information along the given direction, originating from the first end point to a second end point; receive a third user input indicating that the second user input has ended; and based on the third user input, add the dimensioning information to the cross- sectional view, the dimensioning information indicating a measurement between the first end point and the second end point. based on receiving the second user input, generate a dynamic representation of the dimensioning information along the given direction, originating from the first end point to a second end point; receive a third user input indicating that the second user input is complete; and based on receiving the third user input, add the dimensioning information to the cross-sectional view between the first end point and the second end point. Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216970, Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11836422, and Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11501040 do not disclose a third mesh intersecting the first mesh. However, in the same field of endeavor, Hopper teaches a second mesh and a third mesh each intersecting the first mesh (Fig. 4B shows the mesh 452 and 453 each intersecting 451). It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of invention to have modified Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12216970, Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11836422, or Claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11501040 with the feature of comprising a third mesh intersecting the first mesh. Doing so could allow more complicated structure to be displayed properly. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: McCall (US 20210232211 A1) – this reference discloses that a user may interact and select positions in three-dimensional space arbitrarily through conversion of a two-dimensional positional input into a three-dimensional point in space. The system may allow a user to use one or more user input devices for pointing, annotating, or drawing on virtual objects, real objects or empty space in reference to the location of the three-dimensional point in space within an augmented reality or mixed reality session. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHONG WU whose telephone number is (571)270-5207. The examiner can normally be reached MON-FRI: 9AM-5PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Xiao Wu can be reached at 571-272-7761. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHONG WU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2613
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 27, 2024
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12657848
INGESTION PIPELINE FOR GENERATING AUGMENTED REALITY CONTENT GENERATORS
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12657827
TESSELLATION HARDWARE SUBDIVISION OF PATCHES INTO SUB-PATCHES
1y 10m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12646275
THREE-DIMENSIONAL OBJECT MANIPULATION CONTROL
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646276
TRANSFORMING IMAGE INCLUDING NON-DIRECTIONAL OBJECT AND DIRECTIONAL OBJECT
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12646249
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXECUTING A TASK
1y 11m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+3.3%)
2y 0m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 497 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month