Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/006,799

Composite Device

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Dec 31, 2024
Examiner
ELAHI, TOWFIQ
Art Unit
2625
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
565 granted / 714 resolved
+17.1% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
738
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
60.7%
+20.7% vs TC avg
§102
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
§112
10.5%
-29.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 714 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 5, 7-10, 12, 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bushnell (US 20170086743) in view of Nothacker (US 20190290197) and Yao (US 20150148774). Regarding claim 1 Bushnell teaches a composite device (fig. 2A-2B, fig. 11) comprising: a sensor device (fig.11, 100) including a first communication portion (fig. 11, item 1155), a sensor portion (1154, 1152), and a display portion ([0058] touch display); and an information processing device (fig.11, 1150) comprising a second communication portion (fig.11, 1156) and an image generation portion ([0099] FIG. 11 shows a block diagram illustrating example components that may be utilized in the wearable electronic device 100… cameras, i.e. image generation portion ), Bushnell is silent on wherein the second communication portion is configured to output data included in the signal to the image generation portion and transmit the image signal to the sensor device, and wherein the image generation portion is configured to generate an image signal on the basis of the data included in the signal wherein the display portion is configured to display an image on the basis of the image signal and wherein the sensor device is capable of being worn on an eyeball. However, Nothacker teaches wherein the second communication portion is configured to output data included in the signal to the image generation portion and transmit the image signal to the sensor device, and wherein the image generation portion is configured to generate an image signal on the basis of the data included in the signal wherein the display portion is configured to display an image on the basis of the image signal (fig.1 and fig.6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Bushnell in light of Nothacker teaching so that it may include wherein the second communication portion is configured to output data included in the signal to the image generation portion and transmit the image signal to the sensor device, and wherein the image generation portion is configured to generate an image signal on the basis of the data included in the signal wherein the display portion is configured to display an image on the basis of the image signal. The motivation is to provide a method for monitoring health related information of a user. Further Yao teaches wherein the sensor device is capable of being worn on an eyeball (0030] Configuring the reader to be frequently worn in proximity to one or more contact lenses enables the lenses to have a reliable external power source and/or storage for sensor data collection, processing of sensor data, and transmission of unprocessed and/or processed sensor data to additional devices; e.g., the above-mentioned display device. Thus, the herein-described reader can provide valuable support functionality, including but not limited to power, communication, and processing resources, to enhance use of contact lenses with embedded sensor). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Bushnell in light of Yao teaching so that it may include wherein the sensor device is capable of being worn on an eyeball. The motivation is to provide methods and systems for controlling analyte levels that may include receiving a sensor measurement relating to an eye-mountable device. Claims 2-4. (Canceled) Regarding claim 5 Bushnell in view of Nothacker teach wherein a user is capable to see an image displayed on the display portion in a state where the image is superimposed on a transmission image that is transmitted through the sensor device (fig.6, fig.1, [0024] method can include aggregating data (e.g., intoxication metric time series) at a database. Aggregated data can be used as a training dataset for building models of user intoxication state and/or related parameters in relation to a wide range of factors. Building models of breathalyzer sensor state based on training data can be performed using any suitable machine learning algorithm). Regarding claim 7 Bushnell in view of Nothacker teach a control portion, wherein the control portion is configured to return from a resting state in accordance with the signal (Nothacker :fig. 9D, when user select N). Regarding claim 8 Bushnell in view of Yao teach wherein the sensor device is used as a contact lens (Yoa: [0030]). Regarding claim 9 Bushnell teaches a composite device (fig. 2A-2B, fig. 11) comprising: a sensor device (fig.11, 100) including a sensor portion (fig.11, 1156) and a display portion ([0058] touch display); and an information processing device (fig.11, 1150) comprising an image generation portion ([0099] FIG. 11 shows a block diagram illustrating example components that may be utilized in the wearable electronic device 100… cameras, i.e. image generation portion), wherein the sensor device is capable of being worn on an eyeball (Yao: (0030] Configuring the reader to be frequently worn in proximity to one or more contact lenses enables the lenses to have a reliable external power source and/or storage for sensor data collection, processing of sensor data, and transmission of unprocessed and/or processed sensor data to additional devices; e.g., the above-mentioned display device. Thus, the herein-described reader can provide valuable support functionality, including but not limited to power, communication, and processing resources, to enhance use of contact lenses with embedded sensor), wherein the sensor device is configured to transmit a signal including information obtained by the sensor portion (Nothacker :fig.2, 230) to the information processing device (Nothacker: fig.1, fig. 6), wherein the information processing device is configured to generate an image signal on the basis of data included in the signal received from the sensor device(Nothacker :fig.2, 230), and wherein the display portion is configured to display an image on the basis of the image signal (Nothacker: fig.1, fig. 6). Regarding claim 10 the limitations are similar to claim 5 so rejected same way. Regarding claim 12 the limitations are similar to claim 7 so rejected same way. Regarding claim 13 the limitations are similar to claim 8 so rejected same way. Claim(s) 6, 11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bushnell (US 20170086743) in view of Nothacker (US 20190290197), Yao (US 20150148774) and further in view of Baranski (US 20160255944). Regarding claim 6 Bushnell is silent on wherein the sensor portion is configured to detect one or more of a blood sugar level, a heart rate, a blood pressure, a body temperature, a degree of oxygen saturation, and a neutral fat concentration. However, Baranski teaches wherein the sensor portion is configured to detect one or more of a blood sugar level, a heart rate, a blood pressure, a body temperature, a degree of oxygen saturation, and a neutral fat concentration ([0072]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skilled in the art to combine Bushnell in light of Baranski teaching so that it may include wherein the sensor portion is configured to detect one or more of a blood sugar level, a heart rate, a blood pressure, a body temperature, a degree of oxygen saturation, and a neutral fat concentration. The motivation is to provide a method of adjusting the fit of a wearable electronic device secured by a band to a user for fitness/health tracking. Regarding claim 11 the limitations are similar to claim 6 so rejected same way. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any of the new reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. -Pletcher US 20140085600 Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TOWFIQ ELAHI whose telephone number is (571)270-1687. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 10AM-3PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, William Boddie can be reached at (571)272-0666. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TOWFIQ ELAHI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2625
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 31, 2024
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602136
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603037
DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD OF DRIVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12579925
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRANSMITTING DATA, TIMING CONTROLLER, AND SOURCE DRIVER CHIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12572029
AIR FLOATING VIDEO DISPLAY APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12572205
USER INTERFACE DEVICE FOR ROBOTS, ROBOT SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+15.2%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 714 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month