Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/009,073

SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RISK PROFILE FOR A DWELLING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 03, 2025
Priority
Jul 07, 2022 — provisional 63/359,165 +1 more
Examiner
FELTEN, DANIEL S
Art Unit
3692
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Jojo Technologies Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
Est. Remaining
59%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
273 granted / 592 resolved
-5.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
636
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
28.4%
-11.6% vs TC avg
§103
38.5%
-1.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 592 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/05/2026 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Status of Claims Claims 1-10 are cancelled. Claims 11, 13, 15-16, 19 and 20 are amended. Claims 21-30 are new. Claims 11-30 are pending. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see arguments, filed 04/14/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-20 under 35 U.S.C. 101, claims 1 and 5 under 35 U.S.C 112(b) and claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. 102 under Devereaux et al have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejections has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Trundle et al. (WO 2021/003264 A1). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 11-30 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated Trundle (WO 2021/003264). As per claim 11, Trundle discloses a security alarm (Fig. 1) (i.e., monitoring system) assembly comprising: one or more dwelling sensors, each said one or more dwelling sensors configured to sense a condition in a dwelling; [¶0031-¶0032] a security alarm system in communication with the one or more dwelling sensors; and a processor (item# 104- i.e., server) in communication with the security alarm system, the processor configured to receive data (item# 111) indicative of a number and type of said one or more dwelling sensors, data (111) indicative of said condition sensed by each said one or more dwelling sensors in said dwelling, data indicative of an extent to which the security alarm system is activated, and data indicative of an extent to which one or more of the security alarm system [[or]] and the one or more dwelling sensors are monitored by a professional company or a person occupying the dwelling, and calculate a risk profile based on said data received by the processor, said risk profile not including any identifying information of the dwelling or the person occupying the dwelling; [see ¶0031-¶0032, esp. ¶0032 where it is determined whether the dweller is a smoker, ¶0033] wherein the security alarm assembly is configured to send the risk profile so determined to an insurance provider or broker and obtain an insurance quote based on the same.[¶0031-¶0035, see ¶0035] As per Claim 12, Trundle discloses including a communication module configured to enable the processor to communicate with and receive data from one or more smart home devices, with the processor being configured to calculate the risk profile in part based thereon.(item# 142)(item#144) [¶0057-¶0058] As per Claim 13, Trundle discloses wherein the processor is configured to adjust the risk profile based As per Claim 14, Trundle discloses wherein the one or more dwelling sensors comprise a temperature sensor, a motion sensor, an optical sensor, a door sensor, a window sensor, a smoke detector, a carbon monoxide (CO) sensor, a water leak sensor, a water flow sensor and/or a humidity sensor, and wherein the one or more smart home devices comprise a smart hub, a smart refrigerator, a smart air conditioning system, a smart oven, a smart cooker, a smart shower, a smart mattress, a smart thermostat, a smart speaker, a smart display, a smart doorbell, a smart lock, a smart plug, and/or a smart lighting system. [¶0031-¶0032]] As per Claim 15, Trundle discloses wherein the one or more dwelling sensors comprise at least one water leak sensor. [¶0031-¶0032; ¶0034] As per Claims 16, Trundle discloses, wherein assembly is configured to create to create a geofence and/or virtual perimeter about a person’s dwelling or property, with the processor being configured to selectively communicate with and/or ping various components of the assembly based on whether a designated said person enters or exits the geofence, with the processor making determinations and/or communicating information to the person, based on the same. [¶00123], [¶00133] As per Claim 17, Trundle discloses, wherein the assembly includes a sliding risk scale (i.e., risk tolerance) within/along which a given said risk profile is determined/adjusted. [¶0043] As per Claim 18, Trundle discloses a computer program product comprising a medium (item# 342)carrying computer readable instructions which, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to execute a method of determining a risk profile for a dwelling[¶00128], the method comprising: determining whether the dwelling is being monitored by a security alarm system and adjusting a base line said risk profile in response thereto; [¶0031-¶0035] determining a type and extent of dwelling sensors within the dwelling and further adjusting the risk profile in response thereto; [¶0031-¶0035] receiving data from said dwelling sensors and further adjusting the risk profile in response thereto[¶0041]; and sending the risk profile so determined to an insurance provider and obtaining an insurance quote based on the same. [¶0031-¶0035, see ¶0035] As per Claim 19, Trundle discloses a computer program product according to claim 18, including determining whether the dwelling sensors include at least one water leak detector and if so, lowering the risk profile. As per Claim 20, Trundle discloses a computer program product according to comprising an application software in communication with the dwelling sensors, a security alarm system and one or more smart home devices, with the application software enabling centralized monitoring of the dwelling sensors, the security alarm system and the one or more smart home devices. [¶00128], As per Claim 21, Trundle discloses wherein the processor is part of the security alarm system or wherein the processor is part of one or more of a computing device and a mobile device. (Item# 104), As per Claim 22, Trundle discloses, including an application software, with the one or more dwelling sensors and the security alarm system being capable of being centrally monitored thereby and/or with the application software being configured to enable an operator thereof to one or more of adjust, control or activate one or more of the security alarm system, the dwelling sensors, and one or more smart home devices. (item# 342)(item# 352)[¶0128] As per Claim 23, Trundle discloses, wherein the processor is configured to adjust the risk profile based the extent to which the one or more smart homes devices are monitored. [¶0041] As per Claim 24, Trundle discloses, wherein the processor is configured to adjust the risk profile based the extent to which the one or more smart home devices are used. [¶0041] As per Claim 25, Trundle discloses, wherein the processor is configured to adjust the risk profile based the extent to which the at least one water leak sensor is monitored. [¶0031-¶0034] As per Claim 26, Trundle discloses, wherein the processor is configured to adjust the risk profile based the extent to which the at least one water leak sensor is used. [¶0031-¶0034] As per Claim 27, Trundle discloses including determining whether and tracking the extent to which the at least one water leak detector is monitored professionally or by a person occupying the dwelling, and adjusting the risk profile in response thereto. [¶0031-¶0034] As per Claim 28, Trundle discloses including determining a number of said water leak detectors and adjusting the risk profile in response thereto. [¶0031-¶0034] As per Claim 29, Trundle discloses, including determining a number and type of smart home devices within the dwelling and further adjusting the risk profile in response thereto. [¶0041] As per Claim 30, Trundle discloses, including adjusting the risk profile in part based on the extent to which the dwelling sensors, the security alarm system and the one or more smart home devices are monitored. [¶0041] Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL S FELTEN whose telephone number is (571)272-6742. The examiner can normally be reached Flex. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ryan D Donlon can be reached at 5712703602. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. DANIEL S. FELTEN Examiner Art Unit 3692 /DANIEL S FELTEN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3692
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 03, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 14, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 22, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 16, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 31, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12651276
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND TRACKING USER ACTIVITIES
4y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12639583
GENERATING GRADIENT BOOSTING MACHINE MODEL REASON CODES
7y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626239
PROVIDING REAL-TIME REPLACEMENT CREDIT ACCOUNT INFORMATION TO A CUSTOMER WHEN AN EXISTING PHYSICAL CARD ASSOCIATED WITH THE CREDIT ACCOUNT IS COMPROMISED
6y 0m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12614232
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING EXCESS FUNDS FROM RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND APPORTIONING THOSE FUNDS INTO INVESTMENTS
4y 9m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12597017
SNAP MOBILE PAYMENT APPARATUSES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS
4y 1m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
59%
With Interview (+12.6%)
4y 6m (~2y 10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 592 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month