Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Jojo Technologies Ltd. maintains a focused patent portfolio within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The current prosecution landscape includes 1 pending office action, which is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a highly concentrated examination process where the company's active matter is overseen by 1 individual. The portfolio is currently assigned to 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a specific technical scope for the pending application.
FELTEN, DANIEL S is the busiest examiner for the company, responsible for 1 pending office action currently on record. Because the company has 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the prosecution strategy is entirely centralized. This singular focus suggests that the outcome of the 1 pending office action will define the immediate success of the company's efforts in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems space. Practitioners should monitor the interactions with FELTEN, DANIEL S as this examiner holds the entirety of the company's pending workload. The presence of 1 distinct examiner within 1 distinct art unit indicates a highly specialized prosecution environment for this active matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FELTEN, DANIEL S | 1 | 46.4% | +12.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19009073 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RISK PROFILE FOR A DWELLING | FELTEN, DANIEL S | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19009073 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RISK PROFILE FOR A DWELLING | FELTEN, DANIEL S | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3692 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19009073 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DETERMINING A RISK PROFILE FOR A DWELLING | FELTEN, DANIEL S | 3692 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 03, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial