Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 19/010,357

ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Priority
Jul 06, 2022 — JP 2022-109159 +1 more
Examiner
MATES, ROBERT E
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Denso Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 5m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
263 granted / 463 resolved
-3.2% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
33 currently pending
Career history
496
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
62.3%
+22.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 463 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The title of the invention is not descriptive. A new title is required that is clearly indicative of the invention to which the claims are directed. The following title is suggested: ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE WITH ROTOR CORE WITH SLITS. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7, 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ozaki (WO 2021166872 A1, see US 2022/0393528 A1 for English Translation). As to claim 1, Ozaki shows (FIG. 4): PNG media_image1.png 484 628 media_image1.png Greyscale A rotating electric machine M comprising: a rotor 7 including a rotor core 21 and a plurality of permanent magnets 22 embedded in the rotor core 21; and a stator 5 configured to apply a rotating magnetic field to the rotor 7, wherein the rotor 7 has a plurality of magnetic poles 26 formed at equal angular intervals in a circumferential direction, each of the magnetic poles 26 includes a corresponding one of the permanent magnets 22 and a corresponding portion of the rotor core 21, each of the magnetic poles 26 has one slit A formed in the corresponding portion of the rotor core 21, in each of the magnetic poles 26, an angle from a first circumferential end to a second circumferential end of the magnetic pole is 360 degrees/P, where P is the number of the magnetic poles 26, each of the magnetic poles 26 is divided into twelve equal areas between the first and second circumferential ends thereof, counting the twelve areas in order of proximity to the first circumferential end, the fourth to ninth areas are respectively defined as a first area, a second area, a third area, a fourth area, a fifth area and a sixth area, the slits of the magnetic poles include a first slit A and a second slit B, the first slit A is arranged in the third area or the sixth area, and the second slit B is arranged in one of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area (para [0022], pole 26 is shown as a projection on either side of slits A, B; slit A is in third area, slit B is in fourth area, slits A, B are larger than one area; the magnetic poles 26 include the entire magnet 22). As to claim 2/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 4 above) wherein the second slit B is arranged, in one of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area, at a position where it generates torque ripple whose phase is opposite to that of rotational (3xP)th-order torque ripple generated by the first slit A (slit B is capable of performing the claimed function). As to claim 3/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 4 above) wherein each of the permanent magnets 22 has a folded shape that is convex inward in a radial direction of the rotor 7. As to claim 4/3/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 4 above) wherein a distance between intersection points between extension lines of an inside surface of each of the permanent magnets 22 having the folded shape and an outer circumferential surface of the rotor core 21 is defined as a magnetic pole pitch, and in each of the magnetic poles, all of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area are set within a range of the magnetic pole pitch. As to claim 5/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 4 above) wherein the first slit A is arranged in the third area, and the second slit B is arranged, in one of the second area, the fourth area and the sixth area, at a position where it generates torque ripple whose phase is opposite to that of rotational (6xP)th-order torque ripple generated by the first slit A (slit A is in third area, slit B is in fourth area, slits A, B are larger than one area, slit B is capable of performing the claimed function). As to claim 7/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 4 above) wherein at least one of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area is set, in all of the magnetic poles 26, as an area where no slit is arranged (the first area has no slit). As to claim 8/1, Ozaki further shows (FIG. 3) wherein the arrangement areas of the slits A,B are identical for each pair of the magnetic poles 26 located 180 degrees opposite to each other. Claim(s) 1, 6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Wang (WO 2022022426 A1). As to claim 1, Wang shows (FIG. 1, 3) A rotating electric machine comprising: a rotor including a rotor core 1 and a plurality of permanent magnets 120 embedded in the rotor core 1; and a stator configured to apply a rotating magnetic field to the rotor 1, wherein the rotor has a plurality of magnetic poles formed at equal angular intervals in a circumferential direction, each of the magnetic poles includes a corresponding one of the permanent magnets 120 and a corresponding portion of the rotor core 1, each of the magnetic poles has one slit 123 formed in the corresponding portion of the rotor core 1, in each of the magnetic poles, an angle from a first circumferential end to a second circumferential end of the magnetic pole is 360 degrees/P, where P is the number of the magnetic poles P, each of the magnetic poles is divided into twelve equal areas between the first and second circumferential ends thereof, counting the twelve areas in order of proximity to the first circumferential end, the fourth to ninth areas are respectively defined as a first area, a second area, a third area, a fourth area, a fifth area and a sixth area, the slits 129, 128 of the magnetic poles include a first slit 129 and a second slit 128, the first slit 129 is arranged in the third area or the sixth area, and the second slit 128 is arranged in one of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area (first slit 129 is in sixth area, second slit 128 is in the third area, pole para [0166], stator, motor para [0206]). As to claim 6/1, Wang further shows (FIG. 1, 3) wherein the first slit 129 is arranged in the sixth area, and the second slit 128 is arranged, in one of the first area, the third area and the fifth area, at a position where it generates torque ripple whose phase is opposite to that of rotational (6xP)th-order torque ripple generated by the first slit 129 (first slit 129 is in sixth area, second slit 128 is in the third area , the slits 128, 129 are capable of performing the claimed function). Claim(s) 1, 9 , 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Kanazawa (WO 2022050016 A1). As to claim 1, Kanazawa shows (FIG. 1, 3) A rotating electric machine 100 comprising: a rotor including a rotor core 1 and a plurality of permanent magnets 9 embedded in the rotor core 1; and a stator 7 configured to apply a rotating magnetic field to the rotor 1, wherein the rotor has a plurality of magnetic poles P formed at equal angular intervals in a circumferential direction, each of the magnetic poles P includes a corresponding one of the permanent magnets 9 and a corresponding portion of the rotor core 1, each of the magnetic poles P has one slit 12 formed in the corresponding portion of the rotor core 1, in each of the magnetic poles P, an angle from a first circumferential end to a second circumferential end of the magnetic pole is 360 degrees/P, where P is the number of the magnetic poles P, each of the magnetic poles P is divided into twelve equal areas between the first and second circumferential ends thereof, counting the twelve areas in order of proximity to the first circumferential end, the fourth to ninth areas are respectively defined as a first area, a second area, a third area, a fourth area, a fifth area and a sixth area, the slits 11,12 of the magnetic poles include a first slit 12 and a second slit 11, the first slit 12 is arranged in the third area or the sixth area, and the second slit 11 is arranged in one of the first area, the second area, the third area, the fourth area, the fifth area and the sixth area (first slit 12 is in third area, second slit 11 is in the fourth area). As to claim 9/1, Kanazawa further shows (FIG. 16, 17) wherein the rotor core 1 is formed of a plurality of core sheets laminated in an axial direction, the core sheets are identical in configuration to each other, in each of the core sheets, there are formed the slits 11, 12 including the first slit 12 and the second slit 11, and the rotor core 1 is formed by laminating the core sheets in a state of having been rotated by 360°/P in units of a predetermined number of the core sheets (sheets para [0043]; four tiers of rotor are offset by 15 degrees para [0041]). As to claim 11/9/1, Kanazawa further shows (FIG. 16, 17) wherein the slits 11,12 of the core sheets are arranged to form, in a laminated state of the core sheets, skew portions in which the slits 11,12 of the core sheets are offset in the circumferential direction with change in positions of the slits 11,12 in the axial direction. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claim(s) 10 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kanazawa (WO 2022050016 A1) in view of Tang et al. (US 20220263361 A1, hereinafter Tang). As to claim 10/9/1, Kanazawa was discussed above with respect to claim 9 and Kanazawa further shows wherein the rotor core 1 is formed by laminating the core sheets. Kanazawa does not show the core sheets in a state of having been rotated by 360°/P in units of one core sheet. Tang shows the core sheets in a state of having been rotated by 360°/P in units of one core sheet (para [0040]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the rotor core 1 of Kanazawa to have the core sheets in a state of having been rotated by 360°/P in units of one core sheet taught by Tang, for the advantageous benefit of producing magnetic skewing without skewing the permanent magnets as taught by Tang (para [0038]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ROBERT E MATES whose telephone number is (571)270-5293. The examiner can normally be reached M to F 12:00pm to 8pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TULSIDAS PATEL can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ROBERT E MATES/Examiner, Art Unit 2834 /TULSIDAS C PATEL/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 06, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12700773
ROTOR MODULE WITH COOLING STRUCTURE
2y 7m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695344
HYBRID ROTOR MODULE WITH CLUTCH ASSEMBLIES AND COOLING OF ROTOR AND STATOR
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12695359
ELECTRIC MACHINE WITH AN END WINDING COOLING ASSEMBLY
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12683441
AIRGAP COOLING SYSTEM FOR AN ELECTRIC MACHINE
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665471
ELECTRIC DRIVE ASSEMBLY WITH COOLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+35.4%)
3y 1m (~1y 5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 463 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month