Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/013,378

DISPLAY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR OPTICALLY COMPENSATING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 08, 2025
Priority
May 27, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0068532
Examiner
TUNG, DAVID
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 4m
Est. Remaining
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allowance Rate
363 granted / 583 resolved
At TC average
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 12m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
606
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
61.4%
+21.4% vs TC avg
§102
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 583 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-5, 7, & 14-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhu et al. (US 20230058388). As to claim 1, Zhu discloses a method for optically compensating a display device (active display region 20 utilized with gamma optical probe) [fig. 2 & para. 74, 46-47, & 116] including a plurality of pixels, a first pixel area (second display region a2) [figs. 2 & 4 & para. 74 & 77-79] including a plurality of first pixels of the pixels, and a second pixel area (first display region, normal display region outside second display region a2) [fig. 2-3 & para. 74 & 77-79] including a plurality of second pixels of the pixels, method comprising: performing, sequentially, a first optical compensation (generation of first gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111] for each of a plurality of first test voltages for gradations (analog data voltages of each color of sub-pixels corresponding to grayscales corresponding to predetermined gamma data set corresponding to gamma curve) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111] of a first range (predetermined gamma data set corresponding to gamma curve) [fig. 1 & para. 62-66] applied to each of the pixels (first gamma debugging to generate firs gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 62-66 & 111]; and performing, sequentially, a second optical compensation (generation of second gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 59, 52-53, 61-66, 47, 116, & 111] for each of a plurality of second test voltages (adjusted analog data voltages corresponding to each color sub-pixels of first gamma dataset) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111] for gradations of a second range (first gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 59, 62-66, 47, 116, & 111] applied to a first pixel of the first pixel area (display region a2, sub-pixel) [fig. 1 & para. 59, 62-66, & 111]. As to claim 2, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the performing the first optical compensation for each of the plurality of first test voltages includes correcting a first test voltage of the plurality of first test voltages for a gradation of the gradations of the first range so that each of the pixels emits light of a target luminance for the gradation (desired luminance corresponding to gradation corresponding to analog data voltages) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111]. As to claim 3, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the performing the first optical compensation for each first test voltage of the plurality of first test voltages includes: applying a first test voltage for a gradation of the gradations of the first range to each of the pixels (analog data voltage corresponding to gradation of predetermined gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111]; measuring a luminance of light emitted from the pixels (gamma debugging, utilizing gamma optical probe) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111]; comparing the luminance of light emitted from the pixels to a target luminance for the gradation of the gradations of the first range (gamma debugging, adjusting analog data voltage to achieve desired luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111]; and determining a corrected first test voltage for the gradation based on the comparison (adjusted analog data voltage that achieved desired luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 52-53, 57, 61, 47, 116, & 111]. As to claim 4, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the performing the second optical compensation for each second test voltage of the plurality of second test voltages includes correcting a second test voltage of the plurality of first test voltages for a second gradation among the gradations of the second range so that a first pixel of the first pixel area emits light of a target luminance for the gradation (target luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]. As to claim 5, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the performing the second optical compensation for each second test voltage of the plurality of second test voltages includes: applying a second test voltage for a second gradation among the gradations of the second range to the first pixel, and applying a corrected first test voltage for a first gradation among the gradations of the first range to a second pixel of the first pixel area (first gamma data set analog data voltage adjusted and utilized for second gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]; measuring a luminance of light emitted from the pixels of the first pixel area (gamma debugging, utilizing gamma optical probe) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]; and correcting the second test voltage for the second gradation so that the luminance of light emitted from the pixels of the first pixel area becomes a reference luminance (target luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111], wherein the second test voltage associated with the reference luminance is a corrected second test voltage (adjusted analog data voltage utilized to generate third gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]. As to claim 7, Zhu discloses the method of claim 5, wherein in the first pixel area, the first pixel and the second pixel are alternately arranged in a first direction and a second direction intersecting the first direction [fig. 4]. As to claim 14, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein a number of pixels arranged per unit area in the second pixel area is greater than a number of pixels arranged per unit area in the first pixel area [para. 74 & 77-79]. As to claim 15, Zhu discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the display device further includes a camera (under screen-camera provided below second display region a2) [para. 72-74], and wherein the camera is disposed to overlap the first pixel area [para. 72-74]. As to claim 16, Zhu discloses a method for optically compensating a display device (active display region 20 utilized with gamma optical probe) [fig. 2 & para. 74, 46-47, & 116] including a first pixel area (second display region a2) [figs. 2 & 4 & para. 74 & 77-79] and a second pixel area (first display region, normal display region outside second display region a2) [fig. 2-3 & para. 74 & 77-79] in which a number of pixels arranged per unit area is greater than that of the first pixel area [fig. 2-3 & para. 74 & 77-79], the method comprising: applying a first test voltage (analog data voltage for red sub-pixel in a2 corresponding to grayscale) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111] for a first gradation among a first range (range of red first gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111] of a plurality of gradations to a first pixel of the first pixel area; applying a second test voltage (analog data voltage for blue sub-pixel in a2 corresponding to grayscale) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111] for a second gradation among of a second range (range for blue of first gamma data set) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111] of the plurality of gradations to a second pixel of the first pixel area; measuring a luminance of light emitted from the pixels of the first pixel area (adjusting analog data voltage to match luminance and chrominance targets) [para. 116]; and correcting the second test voltage for the second gradation so that a measured luminance of light emitted from the pixels of the first pixel area becomes a reference luminance (generating second gamma data set based on measurements) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]. As to claim 17, Zhu discloses the method of claim 16, wherein applying the first test voltage includes correcting the first test voltage so that the first pixel emits light of a target luminance for the first gradation (adjusting analog data voltage to meet target luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]. As to claim 18, Zhu discloses method of claim 17, wherein applying the second test voltage includes correcting the second test voltage for the second gradation so that a second pixel emits light of a target luminance for the second gradation (adjusting analog data voltage to meet target luminance) [fig. 1 & para. 57-59, 52-53, 47, 61-66, 116, & 111]. Claim(s) 19-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hwang et al. (US 20220051617). As to claim 19, Hwang discloses a display device [abstract] comprising: a pixel unit (display panel 100) [figs. 1-2 & para. 47] including a first pixel area (second pixel region ca) [figs. 1-2 & 4 & para. 47] and a second pixel area (first pixel region da) [figs. 1-3 & para. 47] in which a number of pixels arranged per unit area is greater than that of the first pixel area [para. 47]; and a data driver (drive ic 300) [fig. 6 & para. 84-86] supplying data voltages (data voltage) [fig. 4 & para. 84-86 to the pixels through data lines (data lines dl) [fig. 6 & para. 84-86] connected to the pixels, wherein the data driver provides the data voltages (data voltages) [fig. 6 & para. 84-86] for a gradation of a first range to the pixels of the first pixel area [fig. 14 & para. 161-164], and provides the data voltages for a gradation of a second range to the pixels of the first pixel area [fig. 15 & para. 167-169]. As to claim 20, Hwang discloses the display device of claim 19, wherein the display device further includes a camera (imaging module) [figs. 1-2 & para. 48], and wherein the camera is disposed to overlap the first pixel area [figs. 1-2 & para. 48]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6 & 8-13 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID TUNG whose telephone number is (571)270-3385. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 10:00AM - 6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at (571)-272-7603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DAVID TUNG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 08, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706063
ELECTRO-OPTICAL DEVICE
1y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12701333
DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRACKING EYEBALLS, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700336
Display Device
1y 8m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12700357
DISPLAY DEVICE WITH COMBINED DRIVING METHODS
1y 2m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12669930
INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM TOUCH FUNCTION ROW AT FLEXIBLE DISPLAY FILM FOLDED OVER HINGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+16.4%)
2y 12m (~1y 4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 583 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month