Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026
Application No. 19/015,346

ON-BOARD RADIATION SENSING APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 09, 2025
Priority
Jan 11, 2019 — provisional 62/791,195 +6 more
Examiner
KIM, KIHO
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Calumino Pty Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1439 granted / 1685 resolved
+25.4% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
24 currently pending
Career history
1696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.0%
-36.0% vs TC avg
§103
55.9%
+15.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1685 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1 – 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Independent claim 1 and dependent claim 8 recites “substantially in parallel”. This term of “substantially” is a relative term. The Specification of the present application fails to disclose what requirement would be met for “substantially”. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1 – 12 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Claims 13 – 20 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: With respect to independent claim 1, Jin (US 7,705,309 B1) is determined to be the closest art, teaching an apparatus, comprising: an array of micro mirrors configured on a first plane; an image sensor configured on a second plane that is substantially in parallel with the first plane; but the prior art of record fails to teach or reasonably suggest: a reflective surface positioned spatially between the first plane and the second plane; wherein the reflective surface is configured to direct incoming lights going through a space between the first plane and the second plane towards the micro mirrors; wherein the micro mirrors are operable to reflect first lights, resulting from the reflective surface directing the incoming lights, in angles representative of intensity of infrared radiations absorbed by the micro mirrors; and wherein the image sensor is configured to capture an image of second lights resulting from the micro mirrors reflecting the first lights. With respect to independent claims 13 and 17, because of the same allowable subject matter as in claim 1. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIHO KIM, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)270-1628. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 8-5 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Makiya can be reached at (571)272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. KIHO KIM, Ph.D. Primary Examiner Art Unit 2884 /Kiho Kim/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 09, 2025
Application Filed
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12702371
HEAT DISSIPATION STRUCTURE AND INSPECTION APPARATUS
2y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12702372
Multi-view exposure X-ray image positioning method and system
1y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12699048
RAMAN-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS MULTIFUNCTION MACHINE, AND MEASURING METHOD EMPLOYING RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY AND INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY
1y 12m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12693154
PHOTODETECTOR
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693436
SCINTILLATION CRYSTAL ARRAY, DETECTOR, MEDICAL IMAGING DEVICE, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+4.4%)
1y 10m (~3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1685 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month