Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/017,905

INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD

Non-Final OA §101§112
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Examiner
NGUYEN, THU N
Art Unit
2154
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 12m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
418 granted / 584 resolved
+16.6% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 12m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
604
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
15.6%
-24.4% vs TC avg
§103
53.6%
+13.6% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 584 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION The instant application having Application No. 19/017,905 has a total 6 claims pending in the application; there are 2 independent claims and 4 dependent claims all of which are ready for examination by the Examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 6 disclose the “wherein” clause merely states an intended result of the claimed invention and does not impose any additional structural or functional limitation of the claim. Therefore, the clause is not given patentable weight MPEP 2111.04. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claims 1-2 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter because of the following reasons: Claims 1-2 recite a system comprising a component. It is noted that the recited limitation in the body of the claim are software per se. The body of the claim does not define any specific hardware that can be used to execute these software components. Therefore, the system is not tangibly embodied in a manner so as to be executable. Thus, in order to overcome this 35 USC 101 rejection, the claim needs to be amended to include physical computer hardware (i.e. a processor, memory) in the body of the claim to execute the software components. Claim 2 discloses the component to convert the first document into first vector data, the additional limitation does not make the claim overcome with the 35 USC 101 rejection. Claims 3-4, 6 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter because of the following reasons: Claim 1 appears to be directed to an abstract idea without reciting additional limitations that tie it to a practical application or without reciting additional limitations that amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. One can mentally generate graph with nodes for spaces in a building as well as assets that are contained within those spaces. Then one can also mentally associate and classify senor readings and generate relationships between spaces, assets and sensors. The additional limitations are receiving data. These additional limitations are mere data gathering which are insignificant extra solution activities under step 2A prong II and well understood routine and conventional under step 2B (For Berkhiemer See MPEP 2106.05(d)(II) Versata.) Step 2A, Prong One: Mathematical Concepts Independent claim 1 is directed an information processing: Generate a list on the basic of the first prompt, generate a third document on the basic, determines whether the list comprises a second chapter; determines that the list comprises the second chapter, determines that the list does not comprise the second chapter. As such, this step can be performed mentally. Step 2A Prong Two and Step 2B Use of receiving first information and second information, extracts a first document, converts the first document and second document would constitute use of a generic computer used as tool to implement the abstract idea discussed above. The step of receiving data associated with a building constitutes an insignificant extra-solution activity in the form of mere data gather, see MPEP 2106.05(g) i. Performing clinical tests on individuals to obtain input for an equation, In re Grams, 888 F.2d 835, 839-40; 12 USPQ2d 1824, 1827-28 (Fed. Cir. 1989); The claim does not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more than the judicial exception because the additional elements when considered both individually and as an ordered combination do not amount to significantly more than the abstract idea. Claims 4 and 6 include vector data, which do not include additional elements that are sufficient to amount to significantly more. Accordingly claims 1-4, 6 are found to be directed to a patent ineligible abstract idea. Allowable Subject Matter There is no references to reject claims 1-6. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to THU N NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)270-1765. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday from 9:30AM-6:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Boris Gorney can be reached at 571-272-5626. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. December 23, 2025 /THU N NGUYEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2154
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Dec 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §112
Mar 02, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 11, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 11, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602417
DOCUMENT SEARCH DEVICE, DOCUMENT SEARCH SYSTEM, DOCUMENT SEARCH PROGRAM, AND DOCUMENT SEARCH METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12602414
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DOCUMENT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE DIVERSE AND RELEVANT PASSAGES OF DOCUMENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12585619
Method and System for Real-Time Collaboration and Event Linking to Documents and Video Recordings
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578893
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COPYING DATA BETWEEN COMPUTER SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12562285
Methods and Systems for Semantics Based Generation of Connections Between Separate Data Sets
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+26.1%)
3y 12m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 584 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month