Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/018,093

MEMORY COMPONENT WITH INPUT/OUTPUT DATA RATE ALIGNMENT

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Examiner
DALEY, CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY
Art Unit
2184
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Rambus Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
680 granted / 814 resolved
+28.5% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
833
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 814 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 22- 41 are pending. Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 22- 41 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11914888. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because as illustrated in the table below. Both the present application and the associated patent teaches the management of data rate transitions between memory elements using a rate alignment module, where the output bandwidth is greater than the input bandwidth. The difference in the present application and the related patent is the present application is embodied in integrated circuit, while the patent’s embodiment is broader memory modules. It would be obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present application is a cost-effective solution of rate alignment. Present Application US11914888 22. An integrated-circuit memory component comprising: a first memory die; and a second die disposed in a stack with the first memory die, the second die having: a first interface coupled to receive a first set of N data bits from the first memory die over a first memory-die readout interval, N being a nonzero integer; and a second interface to output the first set of N data bits from the integrated-circuit memory component over a first data-output interval briefer than the first memory- die readout interval. 1. A memory component comprising: a first core storage array to provide successive sets of N data bits over successive core-readout intervals, respectively, N being a nonzero integer; and output circuitry to receive the successive sets of N data bits from the first core storage array and to output the successive sets of N data bits from the memory component over successive data-output intervals, respectively, each one of the data-output intervals being briefer than any one of the core-readout intervals. 32. A method of operation within an integrated-circuit memory component having a first memory die stacked on a second die, the method comprising: receiving, via a first interface of the second die, a first set of N data bits from the first memory die over a first memory-die readout interval, N being a nonzero integer; and outputting the first set of N data bits from the integrated-circuit memory component via a second interface of the second die over a first data-output interval briefer than the first memory-die readout interval. 11. A method of operation within a memory component having a first core storage array and output circuitry, the method comprising: providing successive sets of N data bits from the first core storage to the output circuitry over successive core-readout intervals, respectively, N being a nonzero integer; and outputting the successive sets of N data bits from the memory component via the output circuitry over successive data-output intervals, respectively, each one of the data-output intervals being briefer than any one of the core-readout intervals. 43. An integrated-circuit memory component comprising: a first memory die; and a second die disposed in a stack with the first memory die, the second die having: means for receiving a first set of N data bits from the first memory die over a first memory-die readout interval, N being a nonzero integer; and means for outputting the first set of N data bits from the integrated-circuit memory component over a first data-output interval briefer than the first memory-die readout interval. 21. A memory component comprising: a first core storage array to provide successive sets of N data bits over successive core-readout intervals, respectively, N being a nonzero integer; and means for receiving the successive sets of N data bits from the first core storage array and for outputting the successive sets of N data bits from the memory component over successive data-output intervals, respectively, each one of the data-output intervals being briefer than any one of the core-readout intervals. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US20160041785, US20160082383, and 20140099106 among others teach rate alignment among memory modules Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY DALEY whose telephone number is (571)272-3625. The examiner can normally be reached 7 - 3:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Dr. Henry Tsai can be reached at 571 2724176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.A.D/Examiner, Art Unit 2184 /HENRY TSAI/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2184
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 27, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602266
EPHEMERAL DISTRIBUTED LOCKING IN MICROSERVICE SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12596666
FRAME PACKING USING STORED TEMPLATES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12596668
DUAL INTERFACE HIGH-SPEED MEMORY SUBSYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585609
AUTONOMOUS INTEGRATED TRANSLATOR FOR LOCAL BUS OPERATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12572489
CHIPLET WITH ADDRESS REMAPPER BLOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 814 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month