Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/018,146

HARMONIC DISTORTION REDUCTION IN INDUCTIVE POSITION SENSORS

Non-Final OA §DOUBLEPATENT
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Priority
Apr 09, 2021 — provisional 63/201,039 +1 more
Examiner
GONZALEZ, MILTON
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Semiconductor Components Industries LLC
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
506 granted / 651 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
663
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
§112
15.9%
-24.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 651 resolved cases

Office Action

§DOUBLEPATENT
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/process/file/efs/guidance/eTD-info-I.jsp. Claims 1-3, 8, 9, 11, 15, and 18-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 3, 4, 6-9, 13, and 15-17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,196,581. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because claims 1, 3, 4, 6-9, 13, and 15-17 of U.S. Patent No. 12,196,581 contain all the features of claims 1-3, 8, 9, 11, 15, and 18-20. Instant Application U.S. Patent No. 12,196,581 1. An inductive position sensor, comprising: a first target coil, included in a target, and including: a first outer lobe having a size based on a first shift ratio of a harmonic period of a receiver coil, and a first inner lobe having a size based on a second shift ratio of the harmonic period, the harmonic period corresponding with a harmonic, the first shift ratio being different from the second shift ratio; and a second target coil including a second outer lobe having a size based on the second shift ratio, and a second inner lobe having a size based on the first shift ratio, the first target coil configured to induce a first waveform associated with the harmonic into the receiver coil, and the second target coil configured to induce a second waveform associated with the harmonic, and opposite the first waveform, into the receiver coil such that the harmonic is nullified in a receiver coil voltage. 16. The inductive position sensor of claim 15, wherein the target further including: the first target coil including the first outer lobe having the size based on a first ratio of a second harmonic period of the first receiver coil, and a first inner lobe having a size based on a second ratio of the second harmonic period, the second harmonic period corresponding with a second harmonic, the first ratio being different from the second ratio; and the second target coil including the second outer lobe having the size based on the second ratio, and a second inner lobe having a size based on the first ratio, the first target coil inducing a first waveform associated with the second harmonic into the receiver coil, and the second target coil inducing a second waveform associated with the second harmonic, and opposite the first waveform, into the receiver coil such that the second harmonic is nullified in the receiver coil voltage. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Ely et al. (US 6,788,221) discloses a position detector comprising first and second members mounted for relative movement in a measurement path. Ely et al. (US 6,534,970) discloses a rotary position detector comprising first and second members, at least one of which is rotatable relative to the other about an axis of rotation. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4-7, 10, 12-14, 16, and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MILTON GONZALEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-7914. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, WALTER LINDSAY can be reached at (571) 272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WALTER L LINDSAY JR/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2852 /M.G/Examiner, Art Unit 2852 8/15/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DOUBLEPATENT (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12716753
INDUCTIVE ANGLE SENSOR AND TORQUE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12710291
INDUCTIVE POSITION SENSOR
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12710458
METHOD FOR POWER CALIBRATION
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12704559
DEPTH OF DISCHARGE DETERMINATION OF ALKALINE BATTERIES
3y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12698986
INDUCTIVE POSITION SENSOR
1y 11m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 651 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month