Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/018,618

RELEASE CAUSE FOR TRANSITION FROM CONNECTED STATE

Non-Final OA §DP
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Priority
May 10, 2018 — provisional 62/669,804 +4 more
Examiner
WENDELL, ANDREW
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allowance Rate
767 granted / 911 resolved
+24.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 4m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
916
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
7.2%
-32.8% vs TC avg
§103
63.1%
+23.1% vs TC avg
§102
8.9%
-31.1% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 911 resolved cases

Office Action

§DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting The nonstatutory double patenting rejection is based on a judicially created doctrine grounded in public policy (a policy reflected in the statute) so as to prevent the unjustified or improper timewise extension of the “right to exclude” granted by a patent and to prevent possible harassment by multiple assignees. A nonstatutory double patenting rejection is appropriate where the conflicting claims are not identical, but at least one examined application claim is not patentably distinct from the reference claim(s) because the examined application claim is either anticipated by, or would have been obvious over, the reference claim(s). See, e.g., In re Berg, 140 F.3d 1428, 46 USPQ2d 1226 (Fed. Cir. 1998); In re Goodman, 11 F.3d 1046, 29 USPQ2d 2010 (Fed. Cir. 1993); In re Longi, 759 F.2d 887, 225 USPQ 645 (Fed. Cir. 1985); In re Van Ornum, 686 F.2d 937, 214 USPQ 761 (CCPA 1982); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Thorington, 418 F.2d 528, 163 USPQ 644 (CCPA 1969). A timely filed terminal disclaimer in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(c) or 1.321(d) may be used to overcome an actual or provisional rejection based on nonstatutory double patenting provided the reference application or patent either is shown to be commonly owned with the examined application, or claims an invention made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of a joint research agreement. See MPEP § 717.02 for applications subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA as explained in MPEP § 2159. See MPEP § 2146 et seq. for applications not subject to examination under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . A terminal disclaimer must be signed in compliance with 37 CFR 1.321(b). The filing of a terminal disclaimer by itself is not a complete reply to a nonstatutory double patenting (NSDP) rejection. A complete reply requires that the terminal disclaimer be accompanied by a reply requesting reconsideration of the prior Office action. Even where the NSDP rejection is provisional the reply must be complete. See MPEP § 804, subsection I.B.1. For a reply to a non-final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.111(a). For a reply to final Office action, see 37 CFR 1.113(c). A request for reconsideration while not provided for in 37 CFR 1.113(c) may be filed after final for consideration. See MPEP §§ 706.07(e) and 714.13. The USPTO Internet website contains terminal disclaimer forms which may be used. Please visit www.uspto.gov/patent/patents-forms. The actual filing date of the application in which the form is filed determines what form (e.g., PTO/SB/25, PTO/SB/26, PTO/AIA /25, or PTO/AIA /26) should be used. A web-based eTerminal Disclaimer may be filled out completely online using web-screens. An eTerminal Disclaimer that meets all requirements is auto-processed and approved immediately upon submission. For more information about eTerminal Disclaimers, refer to www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/applying-online/eterminal-disclaimer. Claims 1-4, 6-11, 13-18, and 20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-3, 5-6, 8-9, 12-16, and 19-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because even though they are not word for word with each other they both teach the same inventive concept. Regarding claim 1, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches a method performed by a user equipment, the method comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 5). Regarding claim 4, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 6). Regarding claim 6, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 3). Regarding claim 7, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 1). Regarding claim 8, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches a non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer readable program code executable by processing circuitry of a user equipment to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 8). Regarding claim 9, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 9). Regarding claim 10, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 12). Regarding claim 11, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 13). Regarding claim 13, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the transitioning of the user equipment to the inactive state is performed during a connection of the user equipment to a 5G core network from a long term evolution network (Claim 14). Regarding claim 14, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 8). Regarding claim 15, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches a user equipment comprising a non-transitory memory; and processing circuitry coupled to the non-transitory memory and configured to read instructions from the non-transitory memory to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 15). Regarding claim 16, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 16). Regarding claim 17, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 19). Regarding claim 18, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 20). Regarding claim 20, U.S. Patent No. 11,317,463 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 15). Claims 1-5 and 7-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 and 7-20 of U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because even though they are not word for word with each other they both teach the same inventive concept. Regarding claim 1, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches a method performed by a user equipment, the method comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 3). Regarding claim 4, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 4). Regarding claim 5, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend configuration (Claim 5). Regarding claim 7, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 7). Regarding claim 8, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches a non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer readable program code executable by processing circuitry of a user equipment to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 8). Regarding claim 9, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 9). Regarding claim 10, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 10). Regarding claim 11, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 11). Regarding claim 12, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend Configuration (Claim 12). Regarding claim 13, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the transitioning of the user equipment to the inactive state is performed during a connection of the user equipment to a 5G core network from a long term evolution network (Claim 13). Regarding claim 14, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 14). Regarding claim 15, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches a user equipment comprising a non-transitory memory; and processing circuitry coupled to the non-transitory memory and configured to read instructions from the non-transitory memory to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 15). Regarding claim 16, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 16). Regarding claim 17, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 17). Regarding claim 18, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 18). Regarding claim 19, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend configuration (Claim 19). Regarding claim 20, U.S. Patent No. 11,723,108 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 20). Claims 1-5 and 7-20 are rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-5 and 7-20 of U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205. Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because even though they are not word for word with each other they both teach the same inventive concept. Regarding claim 1, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches a method performed by a user equipment, the method comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 1). Regarding claim 2, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 2). Regarding claim 3, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 3). Regarding claim 4, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 4). Regarding claim 5, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend configuration (Claim 5). Regarding claim 7, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 7). Regarding claim 8, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches a non-transitory computer readable medium storing computer readable program code executable by processing circuitry of a user equipment to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 8). Regarding claim 9, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 9). Regarding claim 10, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein applying delta signalling comprises receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 10). Regarding claim 11, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 11). Regarding claim 12, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend Configuration (Claim 12). Regarding claim 13, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the transitioning of the user equipment to the inactive state is performed during a connection of the user equipment to a 5G core network from a long term evolution network (Claim 13). Regarding claim 14, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 14). Regarding claim 15, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches a user equipment comprising a non-transitory memory; and processing circuitry coupled to the non-transitory memory and configured to read instructions from the non-transitory memory to perform operations comprising receiving a radio resource control message; determining whether a suspend configuration field is present or absent in the RRC message; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is present applying delta signalling corresponding to a suspend configuration indicated by the suspend configuration field; and transitioning the user equipment to an inactive state; based on the determination that the suspend configuration field is absent, transitioning the user equipment to an idle state (Claim 15). Regarding claim 16, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration field indicates a configuration corresponding to the inactive state (Claim 16). Regarding claim 17, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches receiving changed suspend configuration information indicated by the suspend configuration field; and accessing unchanged suspend configuration information from previously stored suspend configuration information on the user equipment (Claim 17). Regarding claim 18, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the suspend configuration includes RAN Notification Area information (Claim 18). Regarding claim 19, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the delta signalling is applied to update RAN Notification Area information in the suspend configuration (Claim 19). Regarding claim 20, U.S. Patent No. 12,232,205 teaches wherein the RRC message is received while user equipment is operating in a connected state (Claim 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANDREW WENDELL whose telephone number is (571)272-0557. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:30AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Wesley Kim can be reached at 571-272-7867. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANDREW WENDELL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2648 9/19/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12739904
TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING PAIRING PROCEDURES BETWEEN COMPUTING DEVICES AND ACCESSORY COMPUTING DEVICES
2y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12737122
Method And System For Synchronizing Audio Transmission In A Single Frequency Network
2y 2m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12732913
METHOD AND DEVICE USED FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION
3y 7m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12722806
FLYING OBJECT COPING SYSTEM, MONITORING GROUND CENTER, COMMUNICATION ROUTE SEARCH DEVICE, FLIGHT PATH PREDICTION DEVICE, POLAR ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEM, POLAR ORBIT SATELLITE, INCLINED ORBIT SATELLITE SYSTEM, AND INCLINED ORBIT SATELLITE
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Patent 12726912
AUTOMATIC OPTIMIZATION OF NOMINAL POWER PARAMETER IN UPLINK POWER CONTROL
2y 7m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+12.0%)
2y 4m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 911 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month