Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/019,026

RADIATION IMAGING SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jan 13, 2025
Priority
Jun 11, 2021 — JP 2021-097723 +1 more
Examiner
YUN, JURIE
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Konica Minolta Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
6m
Est. Remaining
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
641 granted / 733 resolved
+27.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
742
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.8%
-35.2% vs TC avg
§103
35.3%
-4.7% vs TC avg
§102
23.4%
-16.6% vs TC avg
§112
25.9%
-14.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 733 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. Independent claim 1 recites: “A radiation imaging system comprising: a controller comprising a hardware processor; and a storage, wherein the hardware processor, under control of a program stored in the storage, performs processes comprising: obtaining a radiation image including a plurality of frame images; calculating an exposure index representative value of the radiation image, based on information obtained from the radiation image; and setting a target value of an exposure index differently for each of at least one imaging mode of the radiation imaging system, and wherein the target value of the exposure index represents a preferable value of the exposure index representative value.” The claim recites “calculating an exposure index representative value of the radiation image, based on information obtained from the radiation image.” The omitted steps are: the step(s) comprising “setting a target value of an exposure index differently for each of at least one imaging mode of the radiation imaging system, and wherein the target value of the exposure index represents a preferable value of the exposure index representative value.” It is not understood how this is done. Specifically, it is not understood the relationship between the exposure index representative value and if and/or how it is used to set a target value of an exposure index differently for each of at least one imaging mode of the radiation imaging system, and wherein the target value of the exposure index represents a preferable value of the exposure index representative value. It is not understood how the preferable value of the exposure index representative value is determined. Also, it is noted that the disclosure teaches two imaging modes: still image imaging mode and dynamic image imaging mode (page 5, lines 15-16). But only “at least one imaging mode” as claimed is required. The metes and bounds of the claim are indeterminable. Claims 2-11 are rejected by virtue of their dependency on claim 1. Independent claim 12 is rejected for reasons similar to the rejection of independent claim 1 above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JURIE YUN whose telephone number is (571)272-2497. The examiner can normally be reached 10:30 am - 7:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David J Makiya can be reached at 571 272-2273. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JURIE YUN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2884 August 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 13, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12742730
ADSORPTION EVALUATION APPARATUS AND ADSORPTION EVALUATION METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12742729
INTEGRATION OF FLUID ANALYZER MODULE MEASUREMENTS FOR QUALITY CONTROL OF FLUID SAMPLING AND PROCESSES FOR USING SAME
1y 12m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12730080
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTRACTION OF STRUCTURAL DATA OF A SAMPLE FROM SCAN DATA
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12730008
SENSING DEVICE
2y 1m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12721571
DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING A PHYSICAL AREA NETWORK FOR DETECTING EFFECTS OF THE SUN
3y 5m to grant Granted Sep 01, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+10.2%)
2y 3m (~6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 733 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month