Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 19/019,907

LOCAL CACHE-BASED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM

Final Rejection §101§DP
Filed
Jan 14, 2025
Examiner
SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP
Art Unit
2876
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Secure Identity LLC
OA Round
2 (Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 3m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
564 granted / 737 resolved
+8.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 3m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
764
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.6%
+5.6% vs TC avg
§102
37.2%
-2.8% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 737 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §DP
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Acknowledgement is made to the amendment, filed 12/24/2025. Claims 1-20 are pending. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 12/24/2025 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of US Application No. 19/019,446 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 1-20 are provisionally rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-20 of copending Application No. 19/019,446 (reference application). This is a provisional statutory double patenting rejection since the claims directed to the same invention have not in fact been patented. Response to Arguments Applicant’s Remarks have been fully considered and are not persuasive. Claims 1-20 were rejected with a statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection. As discussed above, the filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. The claims are rejected accordingly. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL whose telephone number is (571)270-1301. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F,7-3 EST. If the examiner cannot be reached by telephone, he can be reached through the following email address: paultep.savusdiphol@uspto.gov If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone and email are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael G. Lee can be reached on (571) 272-2398. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for published applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Patent Center for authorized users only. Should you have questions about access to Patent Center, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) Form at https://www.uspto.gov/patents/uspto-automated- interview-request-air-form. /PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2876
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 14, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §101, §DP
Dec 24, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 04, 2026
Final Rejection — §101, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599452
SYSTEMS, APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATICALLY COUNTING MEDICAL OBJECTS, ESTIMATING BLOOD LOSS AND/OR COMMUNICATING BETWEEN MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592099
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FRAUD PREVENTION USING SECURITY SCREENING IMAGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12547858
Bioptic Barcode Reader and Carrier Assembly for a Bioptic Barcode Reader
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12536880
INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12536878
ZERO TRUST BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHM DRIVEN REIMAGE PROCESS ON AN AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE LEVERAGING RAM PARTITIONING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+16.3%)
2y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 737 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month