Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Secure Identity LLC maintains a company patent portfolio with 5 pending office actions, all situated within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These 5 actions are distributed across 5 distinct examiners, which suggests a broad exposure to different individual examiner styles despite the technical concentration. Prosecution is spread across 3 distinct art units, indicating that the portfolio's subject matter spans multiple specialized groups within the USPTO. This diversity in 3 distinct art units may require the applicant to navigate varying internal policies even within the same technology area.
The busiest examiner for the firm is PAULTEP SAVUSDIPHOL, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 5 pending office actions in total, no individual examiner holds a majority of the workload. This distribution across 5 distinct examiners means that the outcome of the portfolio is not dependent on any 1 individual. Practitioners should prepare for 5 sets of examiner preferences across the 3 distinct art units currently engaged in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics field. This decentralized workload suggests that prosecution strategies must be tailored to each specific examiner's historical patterns.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (20%) |
| §101 + other | 2 (40%) |
| §103 only | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP | 1 | 76.9% | +17.0% |
| MARIAM, DANIEL G | 1 | 90.6% | +10.4% |
| GOINS, DAVETTA WOODS | 1 | 65.9% | +4.0% |
| MISIASZEK, MICHAEL | 1 | 55.9% | +14.8% |
| SIVJI, NIZAR N | 1 | 85.7% | +19.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18797390 | BIOMETRIC EXIT WITH AN ASSET | MISIASZEK, MICHAEL | 41d |
| 18981435 | BIOMETRIC GALLERY MANAGEMENT USING WIRELESS IDENTIFIERS | MARIAM, DANIEL G | — |
| 18827631 | PROVIDING DIGITAL IDENTIFICATIONS GENERATED FOR CHECKPOINT VALIDATION BASED ON BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION | GOINS, DAVETTA WOODS | — |
| 18670248 | IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ENROLLMENT AND VALIDATION AND/OR AUTHENTICATION | SIVJI, NIZAR N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19019907 | LOCAL CACHE-BASED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM | SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP | 41d |
| 18797390 | BIOMETRIC EXIT WITH AN ASSET | MISIASZEK, MICHAEL | 41d |
| 18981435 | BIOMETRIC GALLERY MANAGEMENT USING WIRELESS IDENTIFIERS | MARIAM, DANIEL G | — |
| 18670248 | IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ENROLLMENT AND VALIDATION AND/OR AUTHENTICATION | SIVJI, NIZAR N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2876 | 1 |
| 2689 | 1 |
| 3688 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19019907 | LOCAL CACHE-BASED IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM | SAVUSDIPHOL, PAULTEP | 2876 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Jan 14, 2025 |
| 18981435 | BIOMETRIC GALLERY MANAGEMENT USING WIRELESS IDENTIFIERS | MARIAM, DANIEL G | — | §103§112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
| 18827631 | PROVIDING DIGITAL IDENTIFICATIONS GENERATED FOR CHECKPOINT VALIDATION BASED ON BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION | GOINS, DAVETTA WOODS | 2689 | §101§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 06, 2024 |
| 18797390 | BIOMETRIC EXIT WITH AN ASSET | MISIASZEK, MICHAEL | 3688 | §101Other | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Aug 07, 2024 |
| 18670248 | IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM ENROLLMENT AND VALIDATION AND/OR AUTHENTICATION | SIVJI, NIZAR N | — | §101§102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial