Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 19/025,346

GAMING MACHINE INCLUDING BRUSHLESS MOTOR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jan 16, 2025
Priority
Apr 05, 2018 — continuation of 10/573,119 +4 more
Examiner
RENWICK, REGINALD A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Aristocrat Technologies Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 6m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
504 granted / 712 resolved
+10.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+9.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
755
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
§103
47.0%
+7.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.6%
-20.4% vs TC avg
§112
5.9%
-34.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 712 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 10, 11, 14, 18, 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rodesch (U.S. Patent No. 5,938,529) in view of Takizawa (U.S. PGPUB 2019/0140500). Re claims 1, 10, 11, 14, 18, and 19: Rodesch discloses a motor system for use with a mechanical reel gaming machine, the motor system comprising: a rotor comprising a plurality of permanent magnets; a reel connected to the rotor for displaying symbols associated with a game (see claim 1: a rotor is connected to a reel; column 4, lines 65-67; column 5, lines 1-3); and a stator comprising a plurality of stator coils spaced from the rotor, wherein the stator, when activated, is configured to provide an electromagnetic coupling between the stator coils (column 4, 65-67; column 5, lines 1-21: windginds) and the permanent magnets, provide rotational torque to the rotor, and cause the reel to rotate (column 2, lines 52-67; column 4, lines 1-14, claims 1 and 4). Although Rodesch discloses a permanent magnet, Rodesch fails to disclose the use of a plurality of magnets. However, Takizawa discloses a similar motor system arrangement wherein a rotor includes a plurality of permanent magnets (see Abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to simply substitute the rotor of Rodesch with the rotor with a plurality of magnets as taught by Takizawa as such would have produced the predictable results of a rotor with permanent magnets to produce rotation resulting in the rotation of a reel. Re claim 2 and 15: Rodesch discloses with respect to the motor system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the stator is axially spaced from the rotor and is configured to be coupled to a frame of the mechanical reel gaming machine (see Fig. 3, Fig. 4; Fig. 10, object 40). Re claim 3, 5, 16, and 20: Rodesch in view of Takizawa discloses with respect to the motor system in accordance with claim 1, wherein the rotor comprises a rotor surface oriented to face the stator, wherein the plurality of permanent magnets are coupled to the rotor surface (see Takizawa, Fig. 4, object 8, see Fig. 5). Re claim 9: Rodesch discloses with respect to the motor system in accordance with claim 1 further comprising a controller electrically coupled to the stator, the controller comprising a processor configured to execute instructions stored in a memory, which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to control the stator based on at least one of a position of the rotor and a current measurement of the stator (column 3, lines 1-8; column 4, lines 13-23). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 8 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Rodesh in view of Takizawa in further view of Yoshino (U.S. PGPUB 2010/0117477). Re claim 8: Rodesch in view of Takizawa fails to disclose with respect to the motor system in accordance with Claim 1, wherein the stator is spaced a distance from the rotor that is between one millimeter and five millimeters. However, Yoshino teaches a motor system similar to Rodesch, wherein the minimum gap between a stator and rotor is between 0.1 to 2.0 mm (see paragraph [0026]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was filed, to modify the motor system of Rodesch with the minimum gap distance of Yoshino for the purpose of optimizing the minimum gap between the stator and rotor in order to increase the efficiency of the system. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 6, 7, 12, 13, and 17 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to REGINALD A RENWICK whose telephone number is (571)270-1913. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 11am-7pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kang Hu can be reached at (571)270-1344. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. REGINALD A. RENWICK Primary Examiner Art Unit 3714 /REGINALD A RENWICK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3715
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 16, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673267
CROSS-CHANNEL BLOCKCHAIN AND NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN SOLUTIONS FOR GAMING SYSTEMS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667780
CONTROL METHOD OF GAME APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD OF SERVER APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, AND RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12635906
ACTION STATE ESTIMATION APPARATUS, ACTION STATE ESTIMATION METHOD, ACTION STATE LEARNING APPARATUS, AND ACTION STATE LEARNING METHOD
3y 4m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12626562
PRESENTATION OF GAMING OFFERS ASSOCIATED WITH IDENTIFIED ITEMS IN AN AUGMENTED REALITY OR VIRTUAL REALITY ENVIRONMENT
3y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12599843
GAMEPLAY RECORDING VIDEO CREATION SYSTEM
3y 1m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+9.6%)
3y 0m (~1y 6m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 712 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month