Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/026,515

FILLET SHAPING DIE AND BONDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 17, 2025
Priority
May 17, 2024 — JP 2024-080760
Examiner
PATWARDHAN, ABHISHEK A
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Toyota Motor Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
193 granted / 261 resolved
+13.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
302
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.7%
+24.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.2%
-26.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 261 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group I (claims 1-3) in the reply filed on 07/07/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 4-5 withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 07/07/2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-2 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Jahanbin (U.S PG Pub 20200047425A1). Regarding claim 1, Jahanbin, drawn to the art of bonding two composite workpieces (stringer 2 and skin 4) [0038-0039], discloses a noodle (12) (interpreted as a fillet shaping die), in between the skin and stringer portions shaping a fillet of an adhesive (6) at a corner created by the stringer and skin which is bonded by the adhesive (6) ([0040]; see figures 1 & 3). The noodle of Jahanbin also has a curved face that shapes a fillet, wherein the curved fillet shaping face is abutting the first member (skin 4) (see figures 1 & 3). Regarding claim 2, Jahanbin has disclosed a counter face connected to the fillet shaping face (the face abutting stringer 2 i.e. second member), wherein the fillet shaping die is fashioned extending in a direction in which the corner extends (as can be seen from figures 1 & 3 – the noodle extends in the areas of the corner created by the skin and stringer forming a curved or arcuate triangle seen from looking into the page), and further wherein a shape of the fillet shaping die is arcuate in a side view of the fillet shaping die as viewed in the direction in which the corner extends (as can also be seen from figures 1 & 3, the noodle is arcuate or convex and bow like) (Figures 1 & 3). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 3 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Jahanbin (U.S PG Pub 20200047425A1) in view of Diehl (EP3437754A1 - see foreign reference attached). Regarding claim 3, Jahanbin has not explicitly disclosed a groove extending from a first side to a second side, however, it is known for a die to have such a groove/recess, in the art of joining two materials, as disclosed by Diehl (see below). Diehl, drawn also to the art of connecting two components (Abstract), discloses a die (25) which is used in joining the two components (Figure 8A), which has a groove/recess (61) extending from a first side to a second side (as can be seen from figure 8A the groove (61) extends from one edge of the die to the other edge i.e. from a first side to a second side). It would have been obvious to an ordinarily skilled artisan to have modified the die of Jahanbin before the effective filing date of the instant invention, with the die having a groove as disclosed by Diehl, to arrive at the instant invention, in order to be able to firmly clamp the two components in joining [0041]. Additionally, it is noted that the addition of a groove to the die would also merely require a change in shape of the die, and as such, changes in shape are held to be obvious and in the purview of an ordinarily skilled artisan, in the absence of new or unexpected results (MPEP 2144.04 IV (B)). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: U.S PG Pubs 20200391449A1, 20120148789A1, 20140299257A1, 20170266874A1 – all drawn to bonding of workpieces with corners and fillets. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ABHISHEK A PATWARDHAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8431. The examiner can normally be reached Monday to Friday 7:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Orlando can be reached at (571)270-5038. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ABHISHEK A PATWARDHAN/Examiner, Art Unit 1746 /MICHAEL N ORLANDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1746
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 17, 2025
Application Filed
Sep 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12734768
Composite Pressure Hull and Methods of Forming
2y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716012
THERMALLY-CONDUCTIVE SHEET, METHOD FOR INSTALLING SAME, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 0m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12689232
INDUCTION CHARGER
2y 2m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680318
JOINT SUPPORT INCLUDING ENCAPSULATED ADHESIVE
5y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12655371
PROCESS OF SEALING POLYVINYLALCOHOL FILMS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+13.1%)
2y 6m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 261 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month