Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026
Application No. 19/031,667

DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jan 18, 2025
Priority
Apr 09, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0048007
Examiner
KHOO, STACY
Art Unit
2624
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
10m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
498 granted / 610 resolved
+19.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+14.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
639
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 610 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 and 21 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites the limitation "the first active area" in line 8 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner suggests changing “the first active area” in line 8 of the claim to “the first active layer”, in order to be consistent with “first active layer” recited in line 7 of the claim. Claims 2-10 are rejected based on dependence on claim 1. Claim 21 recites the limitation "the first active area" in line 8 of the claim. There is insufficient antecedent basis for this limitation in the claim. Examiner suggests changing “the first active area” in line 8 of the claim to “the first active layer”, in order to be consistent with “first active layer” recited in line 7 of claim 21. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11-20 are allowed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-10 and 21 have been considered but are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STACY KHOO whose telephone number is (571)270-3698. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00 am-5:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Matthew Eason can be reached at 571-270-7230. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STACY KHOO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2624
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 18, 2025
Application Filed
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 27, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 03, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 04, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
May 15, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707722
Display Panel and Display Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12704910
Display System, Display Device, and Light-Emitting Apparatus
1y 7m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12694826
PIXEL GROUP, ARRAY SUBSTRATE, AND DISPLAY PANEL
2y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12684977
ARRAY SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12675171
ERGONOMIC KEYBINDING ADJUSTMENTS FROM USER BEHAVIORAL INPUT
2y 10m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+14.5%)
2y 5m (~10m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 610 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month