Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 19/033,668

Failure Diagnosis Circuit, Vibrator Device, And Physical Quantity Sensor

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 22, 2025
Priority
Jan 23, 2024 — JP 2024-007914
Examiner
HOQUE, FARHANA AKHTER
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Seiko Epson Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
8m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allowance Rate
760 granted / 884 resolved
+26.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
13 currently pending
Career history
894
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
51.2%
+11.2% vs TC avg
§102
38.1%
-1.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 884 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – Claims 1-6, 8 and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nakajima et al. (U.S. Publication No. 2021/0231703 A1). With respect to claim 7, the prior art fails to teach in combination with the rest of the limitations in the claim: “an abnormality determination circuit configured to determine whether the reference voltage is abnormal and output an abnormality determination signal indicating a determination result; and a failure diagnosis signal output circuit configured to diagnose whether the reference voltage generation circuit. fails based on the abnormality determination signal, and output a failure diagnosis signal indicating a diagnosis result, wherein the failure diagnosis signal output circuit diagnoses that the reference voltage generation circuit fails when the abnormality determination signal continues for a predetermined time and the reference voltage is abnormal.” With respect to claim 1, Nakajima et al. discloses a failure diagnosis circuit that performs failure diagnosis on a reference voltage generation circuit (para 0029, lines 1-9), wherein the failure diagnosis circuit monitors a reference voltage supplied from the reference voltage generation circuit to a first circuit (see reference voltage generation circuit 40 shown in Fig. 1), and diagnoses that the reference voltage generation circuit fails when a state in which the reference voltage is not within a predetermined range continues for a predetermined time (para 0029, lines 8-12). With respect to claim 2, Nakajima et al. discloses the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 1, wherein the first circuit is an analog-digital conversion circuit that converts an analog signal into a digital signal (para 0029, lines 1-5). With respect to claim 3, Nakajima et al. discloses the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 1, wherein the first circuit is a physical quantity signal processing circuit that outputs a drive signal for driving a physical quantity detection element for detecting a physical quantity (see physical quantity detection circuit 2 includes and angular velocity signal processing circuit 10 shown in Fig. 1), and generates a detection signal corresponding to the physical quantity based on an output signal of the physical quantity detection element (para 0029, lines 1-8). With respect to claim 4, Nakajima et al. discloses the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 2, wherein the reference voltage temporarily fluctuates in at least one of a timing at which the analog-digital conversion circuit starts sampling of the analog signal and a timing at which the analog-digital conversion circuit ends the sampling (para 0089, lines 1-13). With respect to claim 5, Nakajima et al. discloses the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 3, wherein the reference voltage temporarily fluctuates in at least one timing of a rising edge and a falling edge of the drive signal (col. 0091, lines 13-19). With respect to claim 6, Nakajima et al. discloses the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 3, wherein the reference voltage temporarily fluctuates in at least one timing of a rising edge and a falling edge of a control signal for controlling the physical quantity signal processing circuit (para 0098, lines 1-10). With respect to claim 8, Nakajima et al. discloses a vibrator device comprising: the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 1 (para 0148, lines 1-8). With respect to claim 9, Nakajima et al. discloses a physical quantity sensor comprising: the failure diagnosis circuit according to claim 1 (para 0148, lines 1-8). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to FARHANA AKHTER HOQUE whose telephone number is (571)270-7543. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 7:30am-4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eman A Alkafawi can be reached at 571-272-4448. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /FARHANA A HOQUE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2858
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 22, 2025
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12748147
Cloud-Based Line Differential Relays Dynamic Testing
1y 11m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12748138
PHASE DISCRIMINATOR FOR REFLECTED WAVES AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF
1y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12733825
SOLID STATE SENSOR
3y 3m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736563
DISPLAY PANEL INSPECTION DEVICE AND DISPLAY PANEL INSPECTION METHOD USING THE SAME
3y 0m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12736705
DISTRIBUTED ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERROGATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+11.3%)
2y 5m (~8m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 884 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month