Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 19/041,066

METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR COLLECTING THE ACROTELM OF PEAT BOGS

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jan 30, 2025
Priority
Apr 09, 2019 — CA 3039879 +5 more
Examiner
BEHRENS, ADAM J
Art Unit
3671
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Premier Horticulture Ltée
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 3m
Est. Remaining
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
430 granted / 559 resolved
+24.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+12.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
582
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
76.4%
+36.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.3%
-27.7% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 559 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting A rejection based on double patenting of the “same invention” type finds its support in the language of 35 U.S.C. 101 which states that “whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process... may obtain a patent therefor...” (Emphasis added). Thus, the term “same invention,” in this context, means an invention drawn to identical subject matter. See Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co., 151 U.S. 186 (1894); In re Vogel, 422 F.2d 438, 164 USPQ 619 (CCPA 1970); In re Ockert, 245 F.2d 467, 114 USPQ 330 (CCPA 1957). A statutory type (35 U.S.C. 101) double patenting rejection can be overcome by canceling or amending the claims that are directed to the same invention so they are no longer coextensive in scope. The filing of a terminal disclaimer cannot overcome a double patenting rejection based upon 35 U.S.C. 101. Claims 23-44 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 as claiming the same invention as that of claims 1-22 of prior U.S. Patent No. 11606904. This is a statutory double patenting rejection. Claim Objections Claims 26 and 27 are objected to because of the following informalities: The claims comprise repeat limitations. It appears that claim 26 should depend from claim 24. Appropriate correction is required. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Just (USPN 3477213). Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM J BEHRENS whose telephone number is (303)297-4336. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9am-2pm MST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph M. Rocca can be reached at (571) 272-8971. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADAM J BEHRENS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3671
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2025
Application Filed
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12635609
DRAPER HEADER WITH AUTOMATIC REEL TO CUTTER BAR CLEARANCE
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12628734
POWER SUPPLY APPARATUS FOR A RIDING MOWER
3y 11m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622358
Riding Lawn Mower with Connecting Device
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616085
BRUSH ATTACHMENT SYSTEM FOR A TURFGRASS MOWER
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616095
PRIMARY EXTRACTOR OF A SUGARCANE HARVESTER INCLUDING VARIABLE ANGLE GUIDE VANES
2y 10m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+12.7%)
2y 7m (~1y 3m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 559 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month