Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/041,436

DISPLAY DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jan 30, 2025
Priority
Apr 02, 2024 — RE 10-2024-0044626
Examiner
GIESY, ADAM
Art Unit
2622
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
Samsung Display Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
685 granted / 843 resolved
+19.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
852
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.7%
-38.3% vs TC avg
§103
52.6%
+12.6% vs TC avg
§102
33.9%
-6.1% vs TC avg
§112
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 843 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
CTNF 19/041,436 CTNF 80468 DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 07-03-aia AIA 15-10-aia The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 07-07-aia AIA 07-07 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – 07-08-aia AIA (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 07-15 AIA Claim s 1-2 and 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102( a)(1 ) as being anticipated by Lee (US Doc. No. 20160372534) . Regarding claim 1, Lee discloses a display device (Figure 1, element 10) comprising: a substrate (100) including a display area and a non-display area surrounding the display area (see paragraph 0059 – note that the non-display area ‘NA’ surrounds the display area ‘AA’); insulating layers disposed on the substrate (see Figures 4 and 5, layers 103 and 107); pixels disposed in the display area (Figure 1, element[s] ‘P’); first power lines disposed in a first direction, each of the first power lines extending in a second direction intersecting the first direction, the first power lines connected to the pixels and to provide a first driving voltage (shown in Figure 1, element 30 – specifically note that the vertical lines on each of the left and right side of the display device 10 wherein the first direction is the X [left/right] direction and the second direction is the Y [up/down] direction and wherein the first power line 30 supplied a first voltage ELVSS); a second power line (40) including first lines (PL) disposed in the display area (AA) and connected to the pixels (P) and a second line connected to the first lines, the second line (41) disposed in the non-display area (NA), the second power line to provide a second driving voltage (ELVDD), the second driving voltage having a lower voltage level than that of the first driving voltage (see paragraph 0066); and a detection line disposed in the non-display area and surrounding at least a portion of the display area (also reads on Figure 1, element 30), wherein the detection line includes: extension lines each extending in the second direction and spaced apart from each other in the first direction by the display area (Figure 3, elements 30a and 30b); a bridge line extending in the first direction, connected to the first power lines, and including end portions (50); and connection lines connecting the end portions of the bridge line to corresponding ones of the extension lines (CNT; see also paragraph 0078 – note that the contact holes bridge between the first power line and the and the end portions), and the second line intersects the connection lines in a plan view (see paragraph 0066). Regarding claim 2, Lee discloses all of the limitations of claim 1 as discussed in the claim 1 rejection above and further that the extension lines are disposed further apart from the display area than the second line, and the bridge line is disposed closer to the display area than the second line (as shown in Figures 1 & 3 – note that extension lines 30a/b are further apart than the second line 41 and the bridge line 50 is closer to the display area than the second line 41). Claim 20 has limitations similar to those treated in the above rejection of claim 1, and is met by the reference as discussed above. Claim 20, however, also recites an electronic device comprising: a processor configured to provide image data and a display brightness value (Figure 1, element 20); a display panel connected to the processor and configured to display an image (10); and a panel driving unit configured to receive the image data and the display bright value and drive the display panel based on the image data and the display brightness value (20) . Allowable Subject Matter 12-151-08 AIA 07-43 12-51-08 Claim s 3-19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion 07-96 AIA The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee (US Doc. No. 20170263880) discloses a substrate for a display apparatus including multiple power lines and detection lines. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ADAM R GIESY whose telephone number is (571)272-7555. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Patrick Edouard can be reached at 5712727603. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ADAM R. GIESY/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2622 Application/Control Number: 19/041,436 Page 2 Art Unit: 2622 Application/Control Number: 19/041,436 Page 3 Art Unit: 2622 Application/Control Number: 19/041,436 Page 4 Art Unit: 2622 Application/Control Number: 19/041,436 Page 5 Art Unit: 2622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 30, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12677563
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12670872
DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12650733
GESTURE-BASED LOAD CONTROL
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12643038
GAMING ACCESSORY WITH SENSORY FEEDBACK DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12640092
DISPLAY SUBSTRATE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 7m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+12.3%)
2y 6m (~1y 0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 843 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month