Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 19/043,647

LOG LIKELIHOOD RATIO ESTIMATION BASED ON PREVIOUS STAGE OF ERROR HANDLING IN MEMORY DEVICES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Feb 03, 2025
Priority
Feb 20, 2024 — provisional 63/555,598
Examiner
YANG, JEFFREY ANDREW
Art Unit
Tech Center
Assignee
Micron Technology Inc.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
9m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
29 granted / 34 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
44
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
82.9%
+42.9% vs TC avg
§112
5.7%
-34.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 34 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1-20 are rejected under U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (US Pat. Pub. 20250055480; filed 08/10/2023; hereinafter referred to as Wang) in view of Alhussien et al. (US Pat. Pub. 20170236592; hereinafter referred to as Alhussien). As per claims 1, 8, and 15: Wang teaches a system (Wang par. 0017, system 100), method (Wang par. 0109, method), and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium (Wang par. 0094, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium 808) comprising a memory device (Wang par. 0017, storage system 115); and a processing device (Wang par. 0094, controller 804), operatively coupled to the memory device, the processing device to: read, from the memory device, at a current stage of a read error handling sequence, current stage data representing a subset of encoded data stored in a plurality of memory cells of the memory device (Wang par. 0036, perform current read operations for assist read zone 0 corresponding to various read threshold voltages for reading contents of memory cells. Please note the read operations are performed on a set of encoded memory cells as stated in Wang par. 0018); determine, for each decoder input bin of a plurality of decoder input bins, a first number of memory cells having their respective threshold voltages falling into the decoder input bin and further having a first binary value (Wang par. 0046, determine a first set of counters for each bin with a first binary value. Please note the counters track memory cells and their respective threshold voltages as stated in Wang par. 0036 and 0048); determine, for each decoder input bin of the plurality of decoder input bins, a second number of memory cells having their respective threshold voltages falling into the decoder input bin and further having a second binary value (Wang par. 0046, determine a second set of counters for each bin with a second binary value. Please note the counters track memory cells and their respective threshold voltages as stated in Wang par. 0036 and 0048) calibrate, for each decoder input bin of the plurality of decoder input bins, a corresponding likelihood value based on the first number of memory cells associated with the decoder input bin and the second number of memory cells associated with the decoder input bin (Wang par. 0087, calibrate corresponding LLR values for bins in each AR zone); associate each memory cell of the plurality of memory cells with a respective likelihood value corresponding to a decoder input bin comprising a threshold voltage exhibited by the memory cell (Wang par. 0036-0037, associate memory cells with respective LLR values to a bin according to read threshold voltages); and decode, based on a plurality of likelihood values associated with the plurality of memory cells, the current stage data (Wang par. 0089-0090, error correction decoding is performed on the data stored in the multibit memory cells based on LLR values). Wang does not explicitly disclose a first binary value yielded by a previous stage of the read error handling sequence and a second binary value yielded by a previous stage of the read error handling sequence. However, Alhussien discloses a first binary value yielded by a previous stage of the read error handling sequence and a second binary value yielded by a previous stage of the read error handling sequence (Alhussien par. 0109, syndrome weights of previous read retry operations are used to select a LLR assignment. Please note the likelihood values indicate a first and second binary value as stated in Alhussien par. 0019). Wang and Alhussien are analogous arts because they are in the same field of endeavor of error correction. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to combine Alhussien’s binary values yielded by a previous stage of read error handling sequences with the system, method, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of Wang. This modification would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing because it allows for the optimal reference voltage to be used as the starting point in future read retry operations (Alhussien par. 0021). As per claims 2, 9, and 16: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein a likelihood value associated with a particular decoder input bin reflects a probability of a memory cell having its threshold voltage within the particular bin to be decoded as a particular binary value (Wang par. 0036-0039, probability of LLR values of different bins having its threshold voltage being decoded as a particular binary value). As per claims 3, 10, and 17: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the likelihood value associated with a decoder input bin is a logarithm of the ratio of the first number of memory cells having the first binary value yielded by the previous stage of the read error handling sequence and the second number of memory cells having the second binary value yielded by the previous stage of the read error handling sequence (Wang par. 0087-0088, LLR values associated with a bin is a logarithm of a ratio of a first set of counters and a second set of counters having binary values). As per claims 4, 11, and 18: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the previous stage read of the error handling sequence exhibits a smallest syndrome weight among syndrome weights of a plurality of stages preceding the current stage in the read error handling sequence (Alhussien par. 0095-0098, previous read retry operations exhibit a minimum syndrome weight). As per claims 5, 12, and 19: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein decoding the current stage data is performed using a low-density parity-check (LDPC) matrix (Wang par. 0021, LDPC decoder uses a decoder parity-check matrix). As per claims 6, 13, and 20: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein calibrating, for each decoder input bin of the plurality of decoder input bins, a corresponding likelihood value (Wang par. 0087) is performed responsive to determining that a syndrome weight produced by the previous stage falls below a threshold syndrome weight value (Alhussien par. 0095, use the lowest syndrome weight to select likelihood value assignments for future retry operations. Please note the lowest syndrome weight is a past minimum syndrome weight as stated in Alhussien par. 0101). As per claims 7 and 14: Wang and Alhussien further teach the system of claim 1, method of claim 8, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15, wherein the processing device is further to: responsive to determining that a codeword produced by decoding the current stage data comprises one or more errors, performing a next stage of the read error handling sequence (Alhussien par. 0096-0097, if decoding is not a success, perform a next read retry operation). Conclusion The additional prior arts made of record and have not been relied upon are considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure as follows: Chen et al. (US Pat. Pub. 20190378576) discloses methods and systems related to a sequence of read level voltages for decoding operations based on a first decoding success indicator and a second decoding success indicator. Chen further discloses confidence values assigned to bins for soft-decoding operations. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JEFFREY A YANG whose telephone number is (703)756-1447. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:30 a.m. - 5:30 p.m. EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Featherstone can be reached at (571) 270-3750. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JEFFREY ANDREW YANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2111 /MARK D FEATHERSTONE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2111
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 03, 2025
Application Filed
Jun 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12669541
ARCHITECTURE FOR TESTING MULTIPLE SCAN CHAINS
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12644925
Supply Chain Security for Chiplets
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12634038
METHODS FOR DYNAMIC DATA TRANSMISSIONS IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12607979
SCAN CELL PLACING METHOD AND SCAN CELL PLACING APPARATUS
3y 4m to grant Granted Apr 21, 2026
Patent 12596149
Diagnosing Identical Circuit Blocks in Data Streaming Environment
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.3%)
2y 2m (~9m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 34 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month